Author Topic: SSPX transfers 2015 (Read 42884 times)

Matthew · « **Reply #30 on:** June 17, 2015, 01:52:15 PM »

Fr. Zendejas is working with one other priest. They switch off every other week, taking care of Danbury, CT as well as Houston/San Antonio, TX. All these locations get weekly Mass.

If/when Father gets another priest working with him, he'll add a 3rd location.

I'll note that you're interested in attending the Mass in Houston, and I'll send you the info when it becomes available.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #31 on:** June 17, 2015, 02:08:02 PM »

Matt:

Quote

I'll note that you're interested, and I'll send you the info when it becomes available.

I think a number of us in north Idaho would definitely be interested. Please PM me.

Matthew · « **Reply #32 on:** June 17, 2015, 03:20:35 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Matt:
Quote
I'll note that you're interested, and I'll send you the info when it becomes available.

I think a number of us in north Idaho would definitely be interested. Please PM me.

I think you misunderstand. I was talking about Mass in Houston. I think you're talking about having Fr. Zendejas' group serve your area.

On that heading, he gets requests from all over to come say Mass for them.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #33 on:** June 17, 2015, 04:44:16 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

So I must disagree with and vocally oppose his sermon of a few months ago, against Fr. Zendejas, as well as any veiled threats he's made to individuals interested in attending Fr. Zendejas' Masses in Houston and San Antonio.

Fr. Zendejas doesn't spend any sermons railing against Bishop Fellay or Fr. Kurtz -- yet he's considered the bad guy. Meanwhile Fr. Kurtz passes over the Gospel of the day to rail against Fr. Zendejas -- and he's the good guy? That's not exactly just or fair.

Do you have a transcript of this sermon?

What part of Fr. Zendejas' position is Fr. Kurtz disagreeing with?

While in St Louis, I remember exactly one reference to the resistence from Fr. Kurtz. I do remember a lecture given by Fr. Kurtz where he outlined why thought Bishop Williamson was either in error or overly exuberant regarding Bishop Fellay and the ongoing negotiations with Rome but there was nothing that stood out as dangerous or even near-dangerous to the Catholic faith of a chapel goer.

Matthew · « **Reply #34 on:** June 17, 2015, 06:52:26 PM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

Quote from: Matthew
So I must disagree with and vocally oppose his sermon of a few months ago, against Fr. Zendejas, as well as any veiled threats he's made to individuals interested in attending Fr. Zendejas' Masses in Houston and San Antonio.

Fr. Zendejas doesn't spend any sermons railing against Bishop Fellay or Fr. Kurtz -- yet he's considered the bad guy. Meanwhile Fr. Kurtz passes over the Gospel of the day to rail against Fr. Zendejas -- and he's the good guy? That's not exactly just or fair.

Do you have a transcript of this sermon?

What part of Fr. Zendejas' position is Fr. Kurtz disagreeing with?

While in St Louis, I remember exactly one reference to the resistence from Fr. Kurtz. I do remember a lecture given by Fr. Kurtz where he outlined why thought Bishop Williamson was either in error or overly exuberant regarding Bishop Fellay and the ongoing negotiations with Rome but there was nothing that stood out as dangerous or even near-dangerous to the Catholic faith of a chapel goer.

No, I don't have a transcript.

What part of Fr. Zendejas' position does Fr. Kurtz disagree with? That's the problem. It's not about doctrine -- he's opposing his person. It's all a "your team vs. my team" game to the neo-SSPX and those who serve them. They fail to prioritize SOULS in their fight for money, parishioners, influence, etc.