Author Topic: SSPX transfers 2015 (Read 42737 times)

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #15 on:** June 16, 2015, 11:37:24 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: covet truth

Is this for sure? Fr. Kurtz was transferred from St. Louis only one year ago to Queen of Angels in Dickinson. To return him after only one year to a former assignment would be extremely unusual, if not unheard of.

I'm not sure what Capt McQ's point was.

I think he meant that "at some point in the past" he was posted to St. Louis, and that's why he knows him.

I also doubt Fr. Kurtz is being moved anywhere. He was just transferred to Houston last year. I was just pointing out that quite a bit of change has been happening in SSPX chapels in Texas in the last couple years.

Fr Kurtz was transferred from the St Louis chapel in 2014. His replacement, Fr Jackson, who was ordained approx 18 yrs ago, is the one being transferred.

I was under the impression that Fr Kurtz was being reassigned somewhere in Texas and that he would be a good gain for any chapel.

I am unaware of Fr Kurtz' actions against the resistance while in Houston. I trust Fr Kurtz' judgement. Fr Kurtz once said during a sermon that if anyone has any evidence of Bishop Fellay being a modernist to please show him this evidence. If someone actually has that evidence, they should contact Fr Kurtz and discuss it with him.

Matthew · « **Reply #16 on:** June 17, 2015, 12:32:14 AM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

Fr Kurtz once said during a sermon that if anyone has any evidence of Bishop Fellay being a modernist to please show him this evidence. If someone actually has that evidence, they should contact Fr Kurtz and discuss it with him.

How trite.

Sounds noble and great, until you think about it for more than 2 seconds. His claim is empty and doesn't hold any water.

As I've said before, the support for the Resistance position is legion, for anyone honestly seeking the truth. There is plenty of docuмentation on CathInfo and other sites, for those interested in knowing the truth.

Open your eyes, and you will begin to see.

Fr. Kurtz also encouraged his parishioners to go to Winona's ordinations this year and "See if anything has changed."

Well, a person wouldn't know what's changed unless they knew the "before" as well as the "after".

And a person wouldn't know a false notion of "Tradition" unless they understood the true position of "Tradition" in the first place.

How many people have read the works of Archbishop Lefebvre? And how many just THINK they know him, from bits and pieces cherry-picked and fed to them by their neo-SSPX priests?

How many have read an account of what happened at Vatican II?

How many truly understand, and how many don't want to know anything? I've heard people actually say they "don't want to know anything" because they suspect they might have to do something about it -- including leaving their comfy SSPX chapel.

Anyone thus scared of the truth doesn't deserve to possess the truth any longer.

Marlelar · « **Reply #17 on:** June 17, 2015, 01:24:11 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

Fr. Leo Haynos (ordained about 2 years ago) to become Prior of St.Louis, MO

Fr. Patrick Rutledge to become head of (boys?) High School in St. Mary's KS

Fr. Jordan Fahnestock (ordained about 2-3 years ago) to become Prior of Armada, MI.

The theme is YOUNG BLOOD TAKES THE REINS OF POWER.

Hmmm... sounds like no experience is required (or desired) for being a Prior. I think that a young priest should be on a short leash and under the close supervision of an experienced priest.

I personally have heard some rather odd "counsel" from young priests in the confessional so I admit I am biased.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #18 on:** June 17, 2015, 06:43:55 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: Capt McQuigg
Fr Kurtz once said during a sermon that if anyone has any evidence of Bishop Fellay being a modernist to please show him this evidence. If someone actually has that evidence, they should contact Fr Kurtz and discuss it with him.

How trite.

Sounds noble and great, until you think about it for more than 2 seconds. His claim is empty and doesn't hold any water.

As I've said before, the support for the Resistance position is legion, for anyone honestly seeking the truth. There is plenty of docuмentation on CathInfo and other sites, for those interested in knowing the truth.

Open your eyes, and you will begin to see.

Fr. Kurtz also encouraged his parishioners to go to Winona's ordinations this year and "See if anything has changed."

Well, a person wouldn't know what's changed unless they knew the "before" as well as the "after".

And a person wouldn't know a false notion of "Tradition" unless they understood the true position of "Tradition" in the first place.

How many people have read the works of Archbishop Lefebvre? And how many just THINK they know him, from bits and pieces cherry-picked and fed to them by their neo-SSPX priests?

How many have read an account of what happened at Vatican II?

How many truly understand, and how many don't want to know anything? I've heard people actually say they "don't want to know anything" because they suspect they might have to do something about it -- including leaving their comfy SSPX chapel.

Anyone thus scared of the truth doesn't deserve to possess the truth any longer.

Why didn't anybody take the Doctrinal Declaration of 2012 and a copy of the CNA interview to him?

These seem to indicate, at the least, that there was a change in position, especially regarding the Council and the light of Tradition part.

I would have discussed it with him if I had the chance. It would have been nice to know how he would respond to these two items.

TKGS · « **Reply #19 on:** June 17, 2015, 07:15:49 AM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

Why didn't anybody take the Doctrinal Declaration of 2012 and a copy of the CNA interview to him?

These seem to indicate, at the least, that there was a change in position, especially regarding the Council and the light of Tradition part.

I would have discussed it with him if I had the chance. It would have been nice to know how he would respond to these two items.

Probably because they instinctively know that it's a trap. If one were to take these things to him, they would find themselves persona non grata at that chapel.

It's merely another manifestation of Newspeak. Father makes it clear that nothing has changed and even challenges people to show him any evidence that anything has changed while he studiously ignores all the evidence staring him in the face.