Author Topic: SSPX Tradcuмania (Read 8751 times)

Incredulous · « **Reply #20 on:** July 12, 2019, 11:50:52 AM »

The SSPX is hosting a CMC (crypto-modernist conference).

Fr. Wegner has been given orders to accelerate his branding campaign.

Bp. Schnieder is Francis's faux-trad emissary.

Michael Matt, a trad sellout, the "Alex Jones of the Catacombs".

Mosher, Fox News... a.k.a. "Fox Jews" my friends.

But you won't find any true traditional Catholic personalities on the SSPX's speakers list.

ResistanceFan · « **Reply #21 on:** July 18, 2019, 10:12:57 AM »

I think this is an important discussion. Some traditional Catholics are very picky, and have isolated themselves completely from the world. How far does a group have to go in the battle to be considered worthy of support? Even if that group's charter is extremely limited in scope, as others in this thread have discussed. Should we boycott a group promoting traditional Catholic hymns and music, if they fail to sort out the pope question?

Ascetik · « **Reply #22 on:** July 18, 2019, 12:01:23 PM »

Looks like a good conference to me.

forlorn · « **Reply #23 on:** July 18, 2019, 03:19:33 PM »

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The Crusaders happily fought alongside Greek schismatics(although, the schism was much more recent and less severe at the time, but it was still a schism nevertheless) in the first few Crusades. Refusing to cooperate at all with other Trad organisations because you don't agree with them on every minutiae, especially when said minutiae are not even relevant to the matter at hand, is just silly. You shouldn't sweep differences under the carpet, true, but you shouldn't let them get in the way of matters where those issues aren't even relevant, especially when you agree with each other on 99% of everything else.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #24 on:** July 18, 2019, 03:57:06 PM »

Quote from: forlorn on July 18, 2019, 03:19:33 PM

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The Crusaders happily fought alongside Greek schismatics(although, the schism was much more recent and less severe at the time, but it was still a schism nevertheless) in the first few Crusades. Refusing to cooperate at all with other Trad organisations because you don't agree with them on every minutiae, especially when said minutiae are not even relevant to the matter at hand, is just silly. You shouldn't sweep differences under the carpet, true, but you shouldn't let them get in the way of matters where those issues aren't even relevant, especially when you agree with each other on 99% of everything else.

for·lorn
/fərˈlôrn/

2. (of an aim or endeavor) unlikely to succeed or be fulfilled; hopeless.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: SSPX Tradcuмania (Read 8751 times)

Incredulous

Re: SSPX Tradcuмania

ResistanceFan

Re: SSPX Tradcuмania

Ascetik

Re: SSPX Tradcuмania

forlorn

Re: SSPX Tradcuмania

SeanJohnson

Re: SSPX Tradcuмania