Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX Tradcuмania  (Read 8563 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SSPX Tradcuмania
« on: July 09, 2019, 02:50:45 PM »
Last week, I posted about the Angelus Press ecuмenical conference (featuring semi-effeminate Theology of the Body expert, Fr. (?) Sean Kilcawley).

But wait, there's more!

There has to be reciprocity, you see!

Therefore, I give you the Catholic Identity Conference lineup!!!

Speakers
  • HOME
  • [color=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]SPEAKERS[/color]


ALL SPEAKERS

[color][size][font]
BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER
Auxiliary Bishop of Astana, Kazakhstan
[/font][/size][/color]
[color][size][font]
MICHAEL MATT
Editor, The Remnant; Host of Remnant Underground
[/font][/size][/color]
[color][size][font]
STEVE MOSHER
President, Population Research Institute
[/font][/size][/color]
[color][size][font]
DIANE MONTAGNA
Rome Correspondent, LifesiteNews
[/font][/size][/color]
[color][size][font]
TAYLOR MARSHALL, PH.D.
Founder of New Saint Thomas Institute
Founder of Troops of Saint George


FR. JÜRGEN WEGNER
United States District of the Society of St. Pius X

CHRISTOPHER FERRARA
President of American Catholic Lawyers, Inc.
 

[/font][/size][/color]
[color][size][font]
CHORBISHOP ANTHONY SPINOSA
Rector/Protopresbyter at Basilica and National Shrine of Our Lady of Lebanon

FR. GREGORY PENDERGRAFT, FSSP
Pastor of St. Stephan of Hungary Latin Mass Parish
[/font][/size][/color]
[color][size][font]
FR. HUGUES BEAUGRAND, IBP


MORE SPEAKERS COMING SOON
Sign up for email notifications when new speakers are added[/font][/size][/color]

Re: SSPX Tradcuмania
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2019, 02:56:03 PM »
Dear CIC-

If you are looking for more speakers, I am available!

My topic will be:

1) Why Archbishop Lefebvre condemned tradcuмenical gatherings like the CIC;

2) Why Archbishop Lefebvre said the rallied communities betrayed Tradition and were "doing the work of the devil;"

3) Why every conciliarist of whatever stripe has compromised the faith, and objectively speaking, does not possess the Catholic faith.

The US District and Michael Matt know how to get ahold of me!


Re: SSPX Tradcuмania
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2019, 04:50:46 PM »
Could you post a few bullet points on the subject here? A lot of people think this is great because it's more exposure for the Society which will inevitably grow tradition. This must be what the leadership has in mind too. My gut and my instincts say that's not how it works in the real world, that there is something false about it. But I don't think I could explain it well if asked.

Re: SSPX Tradcuмania
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2019, 05:11:56 PM »
Thank you, Sean, for your posts!

Yes, please post some words from the Archbishop!  

Modernism and the Catholicism cannot live in harmony and preach alongside one another. 

Hoping you are invited to speak!    ;)

Re: SSPX Tradcuмania
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2019, 06:24:35 PM »
Hello HSM and Barbara: 

I would refer you to posts 19 and 34 in the CCCC thread.

Excerpt from #19:

Archbishop Lefebvre considered collaboration with the rallied/approved once-traditional groups like the FSSP or IBP impossible:

"And we must not waver for one moment either in not being with those who are in the process of betraying us. Some people are always admiring the grass in the neighbor's field. Instead of looking to their friends, to the Church's defenders, to those fighting on the battlefield, they look to our enemies on the other side. "After all, we must be charitable, we must be kind, we must not be divisive, after all, they are celebrating the Tridentine Mass, they are not as bad as everyone says"—but they are betraying us—betraying us! They are shaking hands with the Church's destroyers. They are shaking hands with people holding modernist and liberal ideas condemned by the Church. So they are doing the devil's work.

Thus those who were with us and were working with us for the rights of Our Lord, for the salvation of souls, are now saying, "So long as they grant us the old Mass, we can shake hands with Rome, no problem." But we are seeing how it works out. They are in an impossible situation. Impossible. One cannot both shake hands with modernists and keep following Tradition. Not possible. Not possible.

Now, stay in touch with them to bring them back, to convert them to Tradition, yes, if you like, that's the right kind of ecuмenism! But give the impression that after all one almost regrets any break, that one likes talking to them? No way! These are people who call us corpse-like traditionalists, they are saying that we are as rigid as corpses, ours is not a living Tradition, we are glum-faced, ours is a glum Tradition! Unbelievable! Unimaginable! What kind of relations can you have with people like that?"
http://sspx.org/en/two-years-after-consecrations


Excerpt from #34:

Archbishop Lefebvre and the old SSPX pulled no punches in teaching the faithful why the Ecclesia Dei communities had sold out the fight for tradition, and that therefore we ought not to attend their Masses:

"The Fraternity of St. Peter is founded upon more than questionable principles, for the following reasons:

Quote
Quote
  • to take away the Mass of all time (for the Novus Ordo Missae is not another form of this, question 5),
  • to grant it to those only who accept the same Conciliar Church’s novel orientations (in life, belief, structures),
  • to declare non-Catholic those who deny this by word or deed (An interpretation of "Everyone should be aware that formal adherence to the schism [of Archbishop Lefebvre] is a grave offense against God and carries the penalty of excommunication." Ecclesia Dei Afflicata), and,
  • to professes itself in a certain way in communion with anyone calling himself “Christian,” and yet to declare itself out of communion with Catholics whose sole crime is wanting to remain Catholic (Vatican II, e.g., Lumen Gentium, §15; Unitatis Redintegratio §3).


Quote
Quote
  • they reject the Novus Ordo Missae only because it is not their “spirituality” and claim the traditional Latin Mass only in virtue of their “charism” acknowledged them by the pope,
  • they seek to ingratiate themselves with the local bishops, praising them for the least sign of Catholic spirit and keeping quiet on their modernist deviations (unless perhaps it is a question of a diocese where they have no hopes of starting up), even though by doing so they end up encouraging them along their wrong path, and
  • note, for example, the Fraternity’s whole-hearted acceptance of the (New) Catechism of the Catholic Church (question 14), acceptance of Novus Ordo professors in their seminaries, and blanket acceptance of Vatican II’s orthodoxy (question 6).

They are therefore Conciliar Catholics and not traditional Catholics.

This being so, attending their Mass is:
    - accepting the compromise on which they are based,
    - accepting the direction taken by the Conciliar Church and the consequent destruction of the Catholic Faith and practices, and
    - accepting, in particular, the lawfulness and doctrinal soundness of the Novus Ordo Missae and Vatican II.


That is why a Catholic ought not to attend their Masses."

But that was the SSPX before the ralliement (or rather, before the ralliement was made public!).