CathInfo.com

Summary:

Fr. Pagliarani's opening speech lasted 24 minutes.  He spent the first ten minutes building up to the notion that the SSPX has chosen to "step aside" because this is a "medical issue".  Ridiculous.  Medical issues often have moral aspects, take sterilization, or in vitro fertilization, etc.  He implies that this is solely a medical issue.

He talks around the notion of "globalism" but refuses to say that they have an obligation to oppose the Satanic globalist agenda.  He feigns being "above it" by appealing to the "supernatural aspect," namely, that it's a punishment for our sins.  EVERY EVIL is allowed by God as a punishment.  That does not absolve anyone of the obligation to fight and resist it.

He says the SSPX refuse to takes sides because he says that both the anti-jab and the pro-jab sides appear to the false principles of "freedom" and "human rights".  So it's OK for a government to butcher its citizens and wrong to insist that they have a right to live?  Communism can take away the human "right" to private property?  He thereby throws out the entire social teaching of the Popes and dethrones Christ the king, deferring to the Globalists.

And his ONLY mention of abortion in the keynote speech was to actually associate the ANTI-JAB movement with abortion, claiming that they're appealing to "my body my choice" thinking.  NOT ONE WORD in his keynote speech about the abortion tainting of the jab.

In the panel discussion later, he tries to pretend that St. Thomas Aquinas backs his position, rambling around the "remote material cooperation" and wrongly referring to it as "taking advantage" of evils done by others.  Sure, let me go to a car lot selling stolen vehicles to "take advantage" of that.  Is he out of his mind or asleep in seminary or a Satanic infiltrator?  This was so bad that I have come to the conclusion that Pagliarani is a Masonic infiltrator of the SSPX.  He had the gall to tie the anti-jab movement to abortion and ignore the abortion link to the jab in his main / keynote speech.

Finally, he uses the "taking cornea from a person who had been killed example" that actually is a deliberately false metaphor.  And the gaps in his metaphor actually prove more clearly the reasons (1 and 2) above why it's really formal cooperation and a grave sin.

This is so bad that it's of the devil, and I accuse Pagliarani of being a Masonic infiltrator.

If by necessity I ever have to set foot in an SSPX chapel again, they're never getting another dime of collection money out of me.

I'm wondering if Sanborn and the SSPX are getting their talking points or marching orders from the same source. They both see globalism in a vacuum and not as a force interacting with current events and moral issues. They even similarly articulate the vaccine issue under this lens.