CathInfo.com

As I said above, I think Pagliarani is using sophistic techniques to "soothe" the "itching ears" of his audience. Here is what St. Paul said on the subject (2 Timothy 4):



Listen at 32:50 where Pagliarani uses St. Paul (1 Corinthians 8) to JUSTIFY the vaccines. That discussion of St. Paul uses the example of "eating meat sacrificed to idols," which is what Pagliarani focuses on. But the main point that St. Paul was making was that a Christian cannot do something that will "scandalize" the weaker members of the Body of Christ. Again, "eating meat sacrificed to idols" was just the specific example he used to illustrate the general moral teaching "to avoid scandal."

Pagliarani turns St. Paul's words upside down. With a hand wave, Pagliarani says "scandalizing others is another matter," which he does not bring up again. He focuses only on St. Paul setting up the moral issue by using the example of "eating meat sacrificed to idols." Far from saying that a Christian SHOULD eat, St. Paul says the Christian may eat IF AND ONLY IF it would not cause a scandal for the weaker members.

So to apply St. Paul's reasoning to our situation, using the example of the Covid vaccine, even if the vaccine did not actually contain aborted baby parts (which it does), but some Catholics thought that it did, and we Catholics consumed those vaccines, we would scandalize the consciences of those who thought the vaccines were made with aborted babies. In that case, we must avoid the vaccine to avoid the scandal.

See St. John Chrysostom's commentary on the issue if you are having trouble understanding St. Paul. You can find it here:

https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/220120.htm

The main point is made in the explanations of verses 8:9-8:13 at the bottom of the St. John's commentary.

This is a great point because scandal is a relatively light weight sin compared to eating meat sacrificed to idols because one is a sin against man and the other is a sin against God.

I wish Catholics wouldn't focus so much on the abortion tainted injection question. (((They))) can so easily overcome this by bringing out a new shot with no connection to aborted babies and then Catholics will have no excuse not to take it.

The reason not to take it, is that the covidian circus is a lie and to take the injection is a public acknowledgement of that lie. That, should be enough for any Catholic or reasonable person to refuse the shot, even if it were just a saline solution and even if the government was giving out fake vaccination certificates.

I suspect that the reason Sweden was spared from the covidian circus, is that the swedes are pretty much OK with a being chipped and marked for the upcoming cashless slave regime.

 

I wish Catholics wouldn't focus so much on the abortion tainted injection question. (((They))) can so easily overcome this by bringing out a new shot with no connection to aborted babies and then Catholics will have no excuse not to take it.

The reason not to take it, is that the covidian circus is a lie and to take the injection is a public acknowledgement of that lie. That, should be enough for any Catholic or reasonable person to refuse the shot, even if it were just a saline solution and even if the government was giving out fake vaccination certificates.

I suspect that the reason Sweden was spared from the covidian circus, is that the swedes are pretty much OK with a being chipped and marked for the upcoming cashless slave regime.

 

This is true.

Unfortunately there is much more to understanding why they want to inject many, many shots into the entire world population.

Clearly it's not about stopping infection or transmission.

So why?


This is directed evolution.


Pfizer CEO calls its jab ‘gene editing,’ exposes his clear belief in eugenics

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla had an hour-long interview on Tuesday with Frederick Kemp of the Atlantic Council in which he calls mRNA shots a “gene editing,” which is an admission the mRNA jabs are not vaccines. Bourla also claims that scientists can “repair the mistakes” in DNA, or in other words they can play God.

https://thelibertyloft.com/2021/11/10/opinion-pfizer-ceo-calls-its-jab-gene-editing-exposes-his-clear-belief-in-eugenics/



(We are giving them permission to genetically alter the entire human race.)


“Eugenics is the practice or advocacy of improving the human species by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits. It aims to reduce human suffering by ‘breeding out’ disease, disabilities and so-called undesirable characteristics from the human population. Early supporters of eugenics believed people inherited mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions could be bred out of the gene pool,”


“Gene drives are a gene-editing application that allows genetic engineers to drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring that all of an organism’s offspring carry that trait. For example, recent experiments are fitting mice with ‘daughterless’ gene drives that will cascade through mouse populations so that only male pups are born, ensuring that the population becomes extinct after a few generations,”


 

(Note from Miser:  They can choose which characteristics they want to enhance or delete from humanity and Bourla just like the leaders at the NIH and the WEF make it very clear they intend to do just that.  I have posted several videos of their very clear statements.  They are excited to now have "write level permissions" to use the "plug and play" operating system the Moderna website brags about.)




Also, edited genes are patentable:

US Supreme Court Says Synthetic Genes Are Patentable, Naturally Occurring Genes Are Not

"However, the court also upheld patents of synthetically created genes, known as complementary DNA or cDNA. "

https://singularityhub.com/2013/06/17/us-supreme-court-says-synthetic-genes-are-patentable-naturally-occurring-genes-are-not/



How do you create complementary DNA (cDNA)??
By using mRNA.

How is mRNA converted to cDNA?
Reverse Transcription PCR

First, the enzyme reverse transcriptase uses the mRNA template to produce a complementary single-stranded DNA strand called cDNA in a process known as reverse transcription. Next, DNA polymerase is used to convert the single-stranded cDNA into double-stranded DNA.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction

This medical paper confirms it:


Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues


https://www.pnas.org/content/118/21/e2105968118




Why can't they understand this? 

We have to protect the children.