Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations  (Read 13240 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

I’d prefer Bp. Kevin Robinson.
Seconded. Unfortunately, that is not going to happen

Offline ElwinRansom1970

  • Supporter
Kennedy Hall on future neo-SSPX episcopal consecrations. He takes a swipe at the Resistance in this video. The guy is such a Fellayite shill!

https://youtu.be/p3YuFgGWg6E?feature=shared


The time is ripe to have conciliar "bishops", perhaps even a "pope" to perform it. Neo-sspx has been desperately waiving its "we're not extremists nor bad schismatics who don't approve of new rites" card for more than a decade. They don't bat an eye anymore about novus ordo clergy (going to sspx) taking over their confessionals and simulating Masses. They showed their willingness to burn the incense before man made inventions with infamous Hounder's oils.

Think about it, isn't this the logical next step in this unholy symbiosis? You give us the "bishops" and we show that we fully accept your new rites so just consecrate them in it. Oh, how happy the Taylor Marshalls of the world will be. 

Again, the only ones to spoil the party will be sedevacantists, independent and to an extent Resistance trads.  

Offline Angelus

  • Supporter
Kennedy Hall on future neo-SSPX episcopal consecrations. He takes a swipe at the Resistance in this video. The guy is such a Fellayite shill!

https://youtu.be/p3YuFgGWg6E?feature=shared

Here's the thing. Hall claims to love the SSPX and pushes the idea that the SSPX has a unique role to play in bringing "the Church" back to Tradition. His narrative, then, is that the SSPX-ALONE-WILL-SAVE-THE-CHURCH. 

But, then he says in the video that a great "solution" (to the lack of SSPX bishops) will be to depend on diocesan bishops for ordinations and confirmations (see timestamp 22:25). This "solution" is identical to the current situation of the FSSP (and other ED groups).

So, why is Kennedy Hall constantly hawking the SSPX to anyone who will listen? Why is Kennedy Hall not attending the FSSP himself and telling his audience that the FSSP-model will save the Church also? What is Kennedy Hall's real agenda?

What is special about the SSPX if not that they have bishops and priests consecrated AND ordained in the traditional Rites? Hall's idea of "tradition" is clearly not prioritizing the "tradition" of a Priesthood/Episcopacy that depends on Rites in use from time immemorial. Instead, he is fine with using Rites (Priestly and Episcopal) invented in 1968, which is contrary to the explicit command of Pius XII in Sacramentum Ordinis. He doesn't even bat an eye over it.

Either Hall is just ignorant about Catholic sacramental theology or, more likely, he is part of an elaborate SSPX PR campaign to prepare the faithful (aka boil the frog) for what is coming soon. 

In a nutshell, if Hall's "solution" materializes, the SSPX will (eventually) be sacramentally indistinguishable from the FSSP, which is exactly what the destroyers have wanted since 1988. It was not Lefebvre's traditional words that were scary to the destroyers. Rather, it was the fact that Lefebvre possessed authentic Apostolic Succession and passed that on to his episcopal sons that they feared. How many current SSPX attendees understand the importance of this distinction? 

Online Twice dyed

  • Supporter
https://fsspx.news/en/news/sspx-holds-treasure-its-hands-fr-pagliarani-interview-20289

For Fr. P, all this is included in the word Tradition.
As you are mentioning, authentic Apostolic Succession is primordial, and should remind the Fairhful 4 times a year.