Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations  (Read 4201 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 488
  • Reputation: +203/-20
  • Gender: Male
  • Violet, purple, and scarlet twice dyed. EX: 35, 6.
Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #15 on: March 04, 2025, 11:53:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

    • Well, thanks, that is a pertinent thought. Just Huondering where is the perspicacity of the thousands of Sspx faithful? 13,376 days since +L consecrated 4 bishops, and lo and behold, no fresh consecrations!
    On a humorous note, how 'bout Sspx going to Rome after the Pope's High Requiem Mass( Traditional Latin  maybe?), and then in this golden state wherein all Catholics are "Sede Vacantes", Fr P. gives his OK and just like that,  6 bishops, without the permission from the Holy Pontiff! 



    Logged
    La mesure de l'amour, c'est d'aimer sans mesure.
    The measure of love is to love without measure.
                                     St. Augustine (354 - 430 AD)

    Offline Twice dyed

    • Supporter
    • **
    • Posts: 488
    • Reputation: +203/-20
    • Gender: Male
    • Violet, purple, and scarlet twice dyed. EX: 35, 6.
    Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
    « Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 11:16:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • https://international.la-croix.com/religion/from-diocesan-latin-mass-to-the-society-of-st-pius-x-young-traditionalists-blur-the-lines

    What ever happened during the neoSspx Winter Conference, Feb 21- 23, 2025? Topic : Episcopal Consecrations in the SSPX: Schism or Necessity?”

    "... New episcopal consecrations could disrupt this trend

    This fluidity, however, could be disrupted if the SSPX proceeds with new episcopal consecrations. The fraternity currently has only two bishops, and rumors about new ordinations were reinforced during its winter conference held from Feb. 21 to 23, themed: “Episcopal Consecrations in the SSPX: Schism or Necessity?” If new bishops were consecrated without papal approval, it would trigger automatic excommunications."...


    Even AI has something. .
    See Attached.
    Logged
    La mesure de l'amour, c'est d'aimer sans mesure.
    The measure of love is to love without measure.
                                     St. Augustine (354 - 430 AD)

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46453
    • Reputation: +27353/-5049
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
    « Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 11:21:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Well, they'll claim there was necessity due to being down to 2 where I suppose they'd be just one jab-induced myocardial infarction away from having a single bishop left.
    Logged

    Offline Seraphina

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3863
    • Reputation: +2886/-272
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
    « Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 11:42:22 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: WorldsAway on March 03, 2025, 06:38:26 PM
    Bishop Paul Robinson :popcorn:
    I’d prefer Bp. Kevin Robinson. 
    Logged

    Offline Twice dyed

    • Supporter
    • **
    • Posts: 488
    • Reputation: +203/-20
    • Gender: Male
    • Violet, purple, and scarlet twice dyed. EX: 35, 6.
    Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
    « Reply #19 on: Yesterday at 12:40:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Is this all they had to say? Their 3 day conference ended on Feb 23, 2025, and then they post a month old article of Fr. Jean-Michel Gleize? Now THAT'S official !!?

    OP.  Ooops.
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiY8IatyrKNAxXeGDQIHRsNIpcQFnoECCEQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsspx.org%2Fen%2Fnews%2Ffuture-consecrations-approaching-deadline-50846&usg=AOvVaw1HThSHU7ihG1Dj6loc3swW&opi=89978449
    Logged
    La mesure de l'amour, c'est d'aimer sans mesure.
    The measure of love is to love without measure.
                                     St. Augustine (354 - 430 AD)

    Offline WorldsAway

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 441
    • Reputation: +390/-50
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
    « Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 01:21:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Seraphina on Yesterday at 11:42:22 AM
    I’d prefer Bp. Kevin Robinson.
    Seconded. Unfortunately, that is not going to happen
    Logged
    If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you [John 15:108

    Offline ElwinRansom1970

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 998
    • Reputation: +755/-143
    • Gender: Male
    • γνῶθι σεαυτόν - temet nosce
    Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
    « Reply #21 on: Today at 07:48:46 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Kennedy Hall on future neo-SSPX episcopal consecrations. He takes a swipe at the Resistance in this video. The guy is such a Fellayite shill!

    https://youtu.be/p3YuFgGWg6E?feature=shared
    Logged
    "I distrust every idea that does not seem obsolete and grotesque to my contemporaries."
    - Nicolás Gómez Dávila

    Offline anonymouscatholicus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 79
    • Reputation: +37/-40
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
    « Reply #22 on: Today at 08:36:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • The time is ripe to have conciliar "bishops", perhaps even a "pope" to perform it. Neo-sspx has been desperately waiving its "we're not extremists nor bad schismatics who don't approve of new rites" card for more than a decade. They don't bat an eye anymore about novus ordo clergy (going to sspx) taking over their confessionals and simulating Masses. They showed their willingness to burn the incense before man made inventions with infamous Hounder's oils.

    Think about it, isn't this the logical next step in this unholy symbiosis? You give us the "bishops" and we show that we fully accept your new rites so just consecrate them in it. Oh, how happy the Taylor Marshalls of the world will be. 

    Again, the only ones to spoil the party will be sedevacantists, independent and to an extent Resistance trads.  
    Logged

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1159
    • Reputation: +489/-94
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
    « Reply #23 on: Today at 03:13:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: ElwinRansom1970 on Today at 07:48:46 AM
    Kennedy Hall on future neo-SSPX episcopal consecrations. He takes a swipe at the Resistance in this video. The guy is such a Fellayite shill!

    https://youtu.be/p3YuFgGWg6E?feature=shared

    Here's the thing. Hall claims to love the SSPX and pushes the idea that the SSPX has a unique role to play in bringing "the Church" back to Tradition. His narrative, then, is that the SSPX-ALONE-WILL-SAVE-THE-CHURCH. 

    But, then he says in the video that a great "solution" (to the lack of SSPX bishops) will be to depend on diocesan bishops for ordinations and confirmations (see timestamp 22:25). This "solution" is identical to the current situation of the FSSP (and other ED groups).

    So, why is Kennedy Hall constantly hawking the SSPX to anyone who will listen? Why is Kennedy Hall not attending the FSSP himself and telling his audience that the FSSP-model will save the Church also? What is Kennedy Hall's real agenda?

    What is special about the SSPX if not that they have bishops and priests consecrated AND ordained in the traditional Rites? Hall's idea of "tradition" is clearly not prioritizing the "tradition" of a Priesthood/Episcopacy that depends on Rites in use from time immemorial. Instead, he is fine with using Rites (Priestly and Episcopal) invented in 1968, which is contrary to the explicit command of Pius XII in Sacramentum Ordinis. He doesn't even bat an eye over it.

    Either Hall is just ignorant about Catholic sacramental theology or, more likely, he is part of an elaborate SSPX PR campaign to prepare the faithful (aka boil the frog) for what is coming soon. 

    In a nutshell, if Hall's "solution" materializes, the SSPX will (eventually) be sacramentally indistinguishable from the FSSP, which is exactly what the destroyers have wanted since 1988. It was not Lefebvre's traditional words that were scary to the destroyers. Rather, it was the fact that Lefebvre possessed authentic Apostolic Succession and passed that on to his episcopal sons that they feared. How many current SSPX attendees understand the importance of this distinction? 
    Logged
    Pages: 1 [2]
    « previous next »