Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations  (Read 13238 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #15 on: March 04, 2025, 11:53:31 AM »

Well, thanks, that is a pertinent thought. Just Huondering where is the perspicacity of the thousands of Sspx faithful? 13,376 days since +L consecrated 4 bishops, and lo and behold, no fresh consecrations!
On a humorous note, how 'bout Sspx going to Rome after the Pope's High Requiem Mass( Traditional Latin  maybe?), and then in this golden state wherein all Catholics are "Sede Vacantes", Fr P. gives his OK and just like that,  6 bishops, without the permission from the Holy Pontiff! 



Logged

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2025, 11:16:27 AM »
https://international.la-croix.com/religion/from-diocesan-latin-mass-to-the-society-of-st-pius-x-young-traditionalists-blur-the-lines

What ever happened during the neoSspx Winter Conference, Feb 21- 23, 2025? Topic : Episcopal Consecrations in the SSPX: Schism or Necessity?”

"... New episcopal consecrations could disrupt this trend

This fluidity, however, could be disrupted if the SSPX proceeds with new episcopal consecrations. The fraternity currently has only two bishops, and rumors about new ordinations were reinforced during its winter conference held from Feb. 21 to 23, themed: “Episcopal Consecrations in the SSPX: Schism or Necessity?” If new bishops were consecrated without papal approval, it would trigger automatic excommunications."...


Even AI has something. .
See Attached.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #17 on: May 20, 2025, 11:21:29 AM »
Well, they'll claim there was necessity due to being down to 2 where I suppose they'd be just one jab-induced myocardial infarction away from having a single bishop left.
Logged

Offline Seraphina

Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #18 on: May 20, 2025, 11:42:22 AM »
Quote from: WorldsAway on March 03, 2025, 06:38:26 PM
Bishop Paul Robinson :popcorn:
I’d prefer Bp. Kevin Robinson. 
Logged

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #19 on: May 20, 2025, 12:40:14 PM »
Is this all they had to say? Their 3 day conference ended on Feb 23, 2025, and then they post a month old article of Fr. Jean-Michel Gleize? Now THAT'S official !!?

OP.  Ooops.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiY8IatyrKNAxXeGDQIHRsNIpcQFnoECCEQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsspx.org%2Fen%2Fnews%2Ffuture-consecrations-approaching-deadline-50846&usg=AOvVaw1HThSHU7ihG1Dj6loc3swW&opi=89978449
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
« previous next »