Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6

Author Topic: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations  (Read 13280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MaterDominici

  • Mod
  • Supporter
Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2025, 01:01:40 AM »
Quote from: Twice dyed on March 03, 2025, 03:19:04 PM
I am not wellread as to the opposition the Sspx had when H.E. Williamson consecrated 6 bishops. It's clear there is a state of necessity etc. ,so what was their take re +W. ?
They're counting on you to have forgotten about that by now. ;)
Logged

Offline Deusvult

Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2025, 08:38:29 AM »
It would be funny if Bergo would accept their request on the condition that they use the new rite of consecration. I wonder what would happen next. :popcorn:
Logged

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2025, 09:53:09 AM »
With every passing day, the world should be questioning why neoSspx is reluctant to consecrate new bishops. Each day now the suspicion that the Society intended to make an agreement with MODERNIST Rome, in 2012 and even prior,  is gaining traction. NeoSspx claim there is only one Church - +Lefebvre repeated hundreds of times that there areT W O  Churches: The Eternal Rome vs Modernist  Rome that has a bastard "mass", bastard sacraments etc. 
We can almost conclude that truly the neoSSPX dreams of being approved by the F*ke church. Why else are they procrastinating??
The truth will sh "out"!
Logged

Offline Godefroy

Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #13 on: March 04, 2025, 09:59:17 AM »
Quote from: Twice dyed on March 04, 2025, 09:53:09 AM
With every passing day, the world should be questioning why neoSspx is reluctant to consecrate new bishops. Each day now the suspicion that the Society intended to make an agreement with MODERNIST Rome, in 2012 and even prior,  is gaining traction. NeoSspx claim there is only one Church - +Lefebvre repeated hundreds of times that there areT W O  Churches: The Eternal Rome vs Modernist  Rome that has a bastard "mass", bastard sacraments etc.
We can almost conclude that truly the neoSSPX dreams of being approved by the F*ke church. Why else are they procrastinating??
The truth will sh "out"!
I had a discussion with someone about this after Mgr Williamson's funeral. It seems that the neoSSPX have gotten into their heads that Mgr Lefevbre's use of supplied juristriction to justify the existence of the SSPX is not canonically reliable. 
 
Logged

Offline Giovanni Berto

Re: Sspx simply waiting for Superior General's decision re: Consecrations
« Reply #14 on: March 04, 2025, 11:22:10 AM »
Quote from: Deusvult on March 04, 2025, 08:38:29 AM
It would be funny if Bergo would accept their request on the condition that they use the new rite of consecration. I wonder what would happen next. :popcorn:

Well, it's quite obvious, isn't it? You would just wait a while and the new "bishop" will make a visit to your nearest chapel and celebrate a beautiful and doubtful pontifical mass with a lot of the sweetest incense and the best singing voices you'll ever hear.:incense:
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
« previous next »