A few days ago, it was reported that the SSPX had sold its church in Syracuse, NY in order to use the local conciliar church, and that the old SSPX church had subsequently become a mosque: https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/beware-st-mary's-kansas/

Now Non Possumus is reporting that the SSPX has sold St. Michael's Church in Erie, PA, and that it has fallen into the hands of a Protestant sect: http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/2019/08/la-iglesia-st-michaels-de-la-fsspx-en.html

I have some questions (which are not accusations):

1) According to the old CIC, it is only a diocesan bishop who can reduce a consecrated church to profane use.  Were these churches ever consecrated?  

2) If so, did the local diocesan bishops involved reduce these buildings to profane use?  The local bishops would obviously be aware, since the SSPX is now using diocesan churches for its Masses (What a great way to ease the people into the conciliar church...literally!).

3) How many more SSPX churches will be shed in order to use conciliar facilities?

4) What were the local reactions of SSPX faithful (or were the labotomized zombies numb to conciliarization)?

5) What was the sales pitch to the people in Erie and Syracuse to justify the move to diocesan churches?

When the SSPX was traditional (at least outwardly so), roughly until 2007-2009 (+/-), nobody would have objected to using conciliar churches for Mass, because it was viewed more as a conquest than compromise: We have true priests saying the true Mass in a church that was built for it.  It was a victory.

But now, with the ralliement added into the historical context, and the aim of SSPX integration -no longer conversion of an occupying enemy!- in view, such is no longer the case: It is the SSPX which is being converted, and that is the reason for the changed perception of Masses in conciliar buildings:

We know the SSPX is not trying to convert the modernists (did not Fr. Pagliarani announce it was no longer necessary for Rome to convert in order to strike a deal?!), while the modernists are being quite successful in converting the SSPX: "What matters most is that there no longer be rejection in their hearts..." (Fr. Cottier regarding Campos).  

And in fact, if one reads the scalding rebuttal of the young SSPX man married in a diocesan church in Canada found in the Remnant comments section, he rebukes the old SSPXers, and declares the new generation of SSPXers do not suffer from the combat mentality of the previous generation; they are no longer "embittered."

Recall that in the 6 conditions (later reduced to only 1, which has already been ceded), the SSPX was willing to surrender to the local bishops permission to build church properties.  Their consent was necessary.  If the justification for abandoning these churches and moving into conciliar abodes was that these SSPX churches were in disrepair, and would cost too much to fix (similar to the lies regarding the seminary in Winona being unfit), did the diocesan bishops block the building of new chapels, with the SSPX knuckling under them?  

Or did the SSPX willingly move into the conciliar buildings simply because the diocesan bishops invited them to abandon their old churches (which were still perfectly fit for worship, as their new tenants evince!!), and the Society wants to show how "approved" and "united" they are with the local heretics?

5) What was the sales pitch to the people in Erie and Syracuse to justify the move to diocesan churches?

6) Is the SSPX "paying rent" to its conciliar landlords?  If so, what are the terms of the "lease?"

7) Naturally, the SSPX pastors in these two locations will be vigorously condemning the modernism of the local bishop and clergy from the pulpits of the conciliar churches they are renting.  

Most traditional Catholics st st Jude’s are from New Jersey anyway. Swedesboro, NJ , Salem County, NJ.  , cherry hill and even north jersey.  Sell st Jude’s and now is good time to buy real estate.  
St Joseph’s in Swedesboro, NJ., St Joseph’s in Woodstown, NJ , St Mary’s in Malaga, NJ are pre Vatican built

No need for schools too much trouble besides everyone home schools. No need for organized sports either when work, pray, fast should be encouraged.  Sports and recreation should be with family and friends.  Girls should learn to cook too.  

We need Mass and sacraments in our area.  

1- the sspx moved to the school site for mass long ago 10yrs. They didn't sell to Muslims at least not directly as far as I understand it was sold to a person.

Hello CC-

Thank you for posting this additional information.  If it is true that the SSPX sold the one church 10 years ago, then I agree the two recent stories on NP are not evidence of a trend, as it seemed.

The SSPX is saying Mass in a local Conciliar Church building? Seriously?

How can the SSPX faithful be OK with this? Have they lost their minds?

Does the priest distribute communion from the tabernacle that was consecrated at a (doubtful) Novus Ordo Mass?

Do the SSPX faithful sweep and purify the area first before they have Mass, since Communion in the Hand is known FOR A FACT to result in a large number of particles (or Particles) on the ground after Mass?

Whether you think the Novus Ordo is invalid, doubtful, or certainly valid -- one of those 2 issues should be a problem for you.

If the Novus Ordo is invalid, you might get mere bread during your Tridentine Mass. If it's valid, then congratulations! You're stepping on countless Sacred Particles which are the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

That's why I'm completely against shared facilities for Novus Ordo/Tridentine Masses. Have your Mass in a converted garage or warehouse if you must, but DON'T share a "church" with the Novus Ordo.

And there's another problem which is a close 3rd: the ubiquitous Novus Ordo wealth/popularity (Trads are less than 1% compared to the # that say the Novus Ordo is right), perception of the Novus as "normal", and Conciliar propaganda, art, and events advertised all over the place. Trads are going to absorb this.

I lived in Syracuse for 3 years and the chapel location was a real hell hole, I witnessed two murder crime scenes one block away and during a procession a guy went into a restaurant with a rifle  and the cops hit him with a stun  gun. During all night adoration this local hobo  came into the church at 3am
And wouldn't leave until I gave him some cash,  I'm happy no one has to go back there
But not to a novus ordo church.

Is the school and n.o. church in a safer area?  All night adoration at an SSPX chapel I attended years ago was eventually changed to First Friday - midnight adoration.  They wanted at least two adult men who were physically fit to be present every hour, but in the end, couldn’t find even one.  Often, people would sign up and never show.  Once, I signed up for 11:00-12:00 along with a family of four and one single man.  The family left early because one of the children got sick.  The man didn’t show.  They asked if I’d was okay with it, and suggested the woman stay and the husband come back at midnight when the two men arrived.  I said, no, I’ll be okay for 20 minutes.  To make a long story short, I was there with Our Lord, my guardian angel, and a noisy cricket until 6:00am when the priest showed up to say his prayers before 8:30 First Saturday Mass.  When I called the priory later in the week to tell him what had happened, he chewed out the men from the pulpit next Sunday.  It was embarrassing because he mentioned me by name.  One other time, I came around 4:30am and had a homeless guy flash me in the parking lot. That, by the way, was the last time I signed up for All Night Adoration.
Now, I can’t do it if I wanted to and it was safe.  My health doesn’t allow and there’s nowhere to go.

Donkath, thank you for clearing that up.  This is the sort of story that turns easily into gossip and then slander, even if unintended.  Such talk gives the Resistance a bad name and dishonors Our Lord.