Quote from: Seraphim

Bishop Tissier said:

"Despite his favorable gestures, his real intention in integrating us into the conciliar orb can only be to lead us back to Vatican II. He told it himself to Bishop Fellay in August 2005 and in a confidential memo by himself, illicitly published, has recently confirmed that."

Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How can Bishop Fellay have the audacity then to try and tell the world the SSPX will be OK in Rome?????????????????????????????????

They need to find a way to KICK Bishop Judas Fellay out !!!

And he said to them: I saw Satan like lightening falling from heaven. St. Luke x. 18

, I'm guessing there will be alot of "holding of breaths."  

Of that you can be certain.  

If the voting is secret then the participants can vote according to their consciences and not bother about the dimpled big brother glaring at them....and vote him out!

Ah! but who counts the votes?

I should have thought about that!.He will. And if he can't count up to 40 then Frs Pfluger and Nely may assist him.

Quote from: AntiFellayism

They need to find a way to KICK Bishop Judas Fellay out !

Be careful of that one.  You and I may not agree with him.  But to call him a Judas is very wrong.

That's true.

When I recently had the chance to go to confession to an experienced SSPX priest in Austria who's wonderfully loyal to the Faith and hence to Archbishop Lefebvre, the good father advised me not to call Bishop Fellay a "Judas", but just a "follower of Judas".

Because that's much more precise.

 "But Pope Benedict XVI, while he is the pope, remains a modernist. His speech Program of December 22, 2005 is a profession of the evolution of the truths of the faith according to the dominant ideas of each era. Despite his favorable gestures, his real intention in integrating us into the conciliar orb can only be to lead us back to Vatican II. He told it himself to Bishop Fellay in August 2005 and in a confidential memo by himself, illicitly published, has recently confirmed that."

   Comment:

1) Certainly the most damning statement to come out against Bishop Fellay since the peace process stepped up the pace in 2009;

2) How can Bishop Fellay and his minions look us in the face and tell us everything will be OK if we sign a practical deal, when according to TDM, the pope has announced his intentions frankly to Bishop Fellay to the contrary?!?

3) And more then this, if Bishop Fellay already knows the SSPX will be destroyed through reintegration into Conciliarism, why does he push forward?

4) Is there any other explanation other than a desire to destroy the SSPX, when one knowingly leads it into the hands of an enemy who has made his intention known and clear?

5) All of the sudden, the "infiltrator" theory does not seem so far fetched; words I would not have spoken before reading TDM's words in this interview.

"But Pope Benedict XVI, while he is the pope, remains a modernist. His speech Program of December 22, 2005 is a profession of the evolution of the truths of the faith according to the dominant ideas of each era. Despite his favorable gestures, his real intention in integrating us into the conciliar orb can only be to lead us back to Vatican II. He told it himself to Bishop Fellay in August 2005 and in a confidential memo by himself, illicitly published, has recently confirmed that."

   Comment:

1) Certainly the most damning statement to come out against Bishop Fellay since the peace process stepped up the pace in 2009;

2) How can Bishop Fellay and his minions look us in the face and tell us everything will be OK if we sign a practical deal, when according to TDM, the pope has announced his intentions frankly to Bishop Fellay to the contrary?!?

3) And more then this, if Bishop Fellay already knows the SSPX will be destroyed through reintegration into Conciliarism, why does he push forward?

4) Is there any other explanation other than a desire to destroy the SSPX, when one knowingly leads it into the hands of an enemy who has made his intention known and clear?

5) All of the sudden, the "infiltrator" theory does not seem so far fetched; words I would not have spoken before reading TDM's words in this interview.

I am guessing this implicitly published memo was the one stolen by Bxvi's butler?

Has anyone seen the text of it?

"But Pope Benedict XVI, while he is the pope, remains a modernist. His speech Program of December 22, 2005 is a profession of the evolution of the truths of the faith according to the dominant ideas of each era. Despite his favorable gestures, his real intention in integrating us into the conciliar orb can only be to lead us back to Vatican II. He told it himself to Bishop Fellay in August 2005 and in a confidential memo by himself, illicitly published, has recently confirmed that."

   Comment:

1) Certainly the most damning statement to come out against Bishop Fellay since the peace process stepped up the pace in 2009;

2) How can Bishop Fellay and his minions look us in the face and tell us everything will be OK if we sign a practical deal, when according to TDM, the pope has announced his intentions frankly to Bishop Fellay to the contrary?!?

3) And more then this, if Bishop Fellay already knows the SSPX will be destroyed through reintegration into Conciliarism, why does he push forward?

4) Is there any other explanation other than a desire to destroy the SSPX, when one knowingly leads it into the hands of an enemy who has made his intention known and clear?

5) All of the sudden, the "infiltrator" theory does not seem so far fetched; words I would not have spoken before reading TDM's words in this interview.

Is it possible he is being attacked by scruples?