Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: catherineofsienaQuote from: CJHI hope so, the Church needs the SSPX.Could you explain how the SSPX is going to help the Church when it enters with both hands tied behind its back?(IOW, one of the acknowledged conditions is the diocesan bishop must give permission for the Society to establish in the diocese, a rule that is killing the FSSP).This recognition isn't about bringing Tradition to the Church. It's about destroying it in order to usher in the hybrid Mass and theology, aka, the Hegalian Third Way.And once the Neo-SSPX becomes, in effect, the "Society of 'Blessed' John XXIII," the expelled, but true, SSPX can recover their rightful name. It will only make sense, because the Neo-SSPX will then have de Lubac, von Balthasar, Blondel, et al, on their seminary shelves, and +Lefebvre will be relegated to the "hell" shelf, as they so euphemistically put it. Of course, I hope this doesn't happen. But it doesn't look good. Kyrie Eleison.
Quote from: CJHI hope so, the Church needs the SSPX.Could you explain how the SSPX is going to help the Church when it enters with both hands tied behind its back?(IOW, one of the acknowledged conditions is the diocesan bishop must give permission for the Society to establish in the diocese, a rule that is killing the FSSP).This recognition isn't about bringing Tradition to the Church. It's about destroying it in order to usher in the hybrid Mass and theology, aka, the Hegalian Third Way.
I hope so, the Church needs the SSPX.