Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX Responds to Cardinal Fernandez  (Read 2876 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: SSPX Responds to Cardinal Fernandez
« Reply #40 on: Yesterday at 02:20:13 PM »
"it would appear" ... might be the operative phrase.

I think the whole thing is just play-acting and that there will be an agreement.  Neither side can afford for there not to be one.

Also, I would say they agree materially, but not formally ... materially meaning that they agree on a state of necessity or emergency to consecrate bishops, but formally they disagree entirely on their "perspective" regarding the Conciliar Church, what I refer to as "Paradigms of the Revolution".

In the one perspective, they're "95% Catholic" but need some adjustments or course correction ... but in the other there's a substantial break betwewen them and the pre-Vatican II Church and they need conversion.

This is precisely what kicked off the debate between Bishop(?) Schneider and +Vigano, where +Schneider argued that V2 could be fixed, whereas +Vigano countered that it's radically defective and needs to be pitched.

I’m not so convinced. The Resistance split into fragments of itself after Bishop Williamson said he would catch the first plane to Rome if Francis called him. Everyone paying attention remembers that as just one example above many. 

SSPX is accused of being too cozy with Rome and simultaneously schismatic on the same threads. Sometimes even implied by the same people. It’s all just confusion, and I don’t buy into it. 



Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX Responds to Cardinal Fernandez
« Reply #41 on: Yesterday at 07:32:07 PM »
Sorry but I couldn't understand your shorthand/abbreviated English.
Sorry I am late to reply... Couldn't connect to CATHINFO.com (I'm joking) CathInfo experienced a rout by the brand new rout...er!

The link here has an interesting interview with Fr. Chazal, Feb 4, 2026

But this is already stale news because Fr. Pagliarani rejects Card. F's. proposal... therefore some parts of the interview are now irrelevant.

TIMESTAMP 8:20 and 28:30 speaks of the canonical status of the SSPX, and deep-rooted ideologies which should make anyone thinking of supporting the SSPX  to consider...Marriage arrangement with local bishops, confession approved by Rome, ordinations approved by Rome, Wacksines favoured by Fr. Pagliarani ; Sherry; and if Rome accepts Chinese K0mmunists to nominate Catholic bishops, this isn't good news. Will the SSPX continue to keep a low profile on all these subjects.? All this is conditioned by the July 1 consecrations, and hopefully the SSPX will get back on track with + Lefebvre's vision of things: No dialogue with Modernist Rome...unless they Convert.
Pray for Pope Leo XIV that he soon converts, but evidently the propects are dark. Just a couple of days ago he said the Vatican won't change on the alphabet humans, but he accepts the concept of the Family unit as good!...?
From Instagram - gαyety
5h
No change coming anytime soon.⁠
⁠   Pope Leo XIV says Church teaching on sɛҳuąƖity and marriage is 'very unlikely' to shift, and that attitudes must change before doctrine does. What does that mean for LGBTQ+ Catholics?
**************************



Fr. F. Chazal

Kohx News



Paraphrased:' Canonically speaking the SSPX is deeply immersed into the Conciliar church, very much so, and for their tribumal affairs, and for their marriage affairs - The SSPX canon expert for the District of France, proposed an annulment to a woman who wanted to destroy the family. We were shocked!! - Large compromises at the Canonical level.
Fr. Pagliarani favored the Cocovid sh0t, designed to alter the DNA of humankind, containing abortion cells. This is all K0mmunist agenda + surveillance State..."

There is a simple transcript, if you click "Show Transcript"
Unofficial. !

Yeah. back. So, and on the question of marriage and and father Morgan is a former superior
1:05:55
of district and he certainly had an experience with no jurisdictions on
1:06:02
marriage and so that for him it's when his eyes opened - because interestingly...
___________________

"loco" is a famous Mexican word and understood in ALL the USA; it means Crazy. so: crazy local bishops.

P2P is Plan to Protect, the protestant program / agency the neoSSPX in Canada submits to fulfill Insurance abuse claims.  The spirit of P2P is not Catholic, and the SSPX sub$cribe to its k0mmunist directives - (read ' surveillance'). If you participate in any way with the faithful, activities, choir etc. you need a police check, for starters... I think the "Parishioners" have to be registered, with some witnesses.

God bless+