CODE OF CANON LAW (1983)

1983 Code Of Canon Law  Vatican Website

Can. 211 All the Christian faithful have the duty and right to work so that the divine message of salvation more and more reaches all people in every age and in every land.

Can. 212 §1. Conscious of their own responsibility, the Christian faithful are bound to follow with Christian obedience those things which the sacred pastors, inasmuch as they represent Christ, declare as teachers of the faith or establish as rulers of the Church. [SSPX exercises no legitimate ministry in Church]

§2. The Christian faithful are free to make known to the pastors of the Church their needs, especially spiritual ones, and their desires.

§3. According to the knowledge, competence, and prestige which they [the Faithful][/b] possess, they have the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church and to make their opinion known to the rest of the Christian faithful, without prejudice to the integrity of faith and morals, with reverence toward their pastors, and attentive to common advantage and the dignity of persons. [Yes, there are some NOT showing due reverence but not ALL]

Can. 213 The Christian faithful have the right to receive assistance from the sacred pastors out of the spiritual goods of the Church, especially the word of God and the sacraments.

Can. 215 The Christian faithful are at liberty freely to found and direct associations for purposes of charity or piety or for the promotion of the Christian vocation in the world and to hold meetings for the common pursuit of these purposes.

Can. 216 Since they participate in the mission of the Church, all the Christian faithful have the right to promote or sustain apostolic action even by their own undertakings, according to their own state and condition. Nevertheless, no undertaking is to claim the name Catholic without the consent of competent ecclesiastical authority.

Can. 221 §1. The Christian faithful can legitimately vindicate and defend the rights which they possess in the Church in the competent ecclesiastical forum according to the norm of law.

§2. If they are summoned to a trial by a competent authority [that exercises a legitimate ministry in the Church], the Christian faithful also have the right to be judged according to the prescripts of the law applied with equity.

§3. The Christian faithful have the right not to be punished with canonical penalties except according to the norm of law.[by clerics who exercise a legitimate ministry in the Church]

Quote from: Incredulous

Nice reference AMS!

And if presented with this, what will the District Superior, Fr. Rostand say?

From his latest comments at Post Falls, he'll want you and your relatives names and the chapel you attend.

I think it's important to show that if the SSPX goes under Rome, they'll have to play by Rome's rules.

Except that the Novus Ordo, like the bishop who has no canonical status or authority, violates these rules.

The Novus Ordo is quite fond of calling the police and levying restraint orders on those whistleblowers who expose sodomy, heresy, and embezzlement.

You see, the proselytes of the Pharisees emulate the hypocrisy of the Pharisees.  After all, the proselytes of the Pharisees are children of hell twofold more than the Pharisees themselves (Matthew 23:15).

Let us not forget that Zionists, even if they are our "friends" and we "like" them, are among the proselytes of the Pharisees.

...Also, I thought +ABL was entirely cynical of the revisions in the 1983 Canon Law ?

And isn't Msgr. Fellay already following the 1983 code of Canon law?

Didn't he and his District Superiors refer to it when suppressing
Bp. Williamson and several SSPX Resistance priests?  

In fact, Father Pfieffer
proved that Fr. Couture had actually violated Canon Law in his expulsion directive to him.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.[/color]

The layers of Pharisaical hypocrisy are astounding: using modernism against tradition without even having any jurisdiction or authority under those modernist legalisms; denying the due process of even the modernist structure; denying even the General Chapter's own rules that the bishops are to attend; scouring the internet that they advise us not to read.

Compounded by the tolerance (promotion?) of porn, blasphemy, and Zionism, compounded by the despicable fratricide and "uranium" "hand grenade" "without supernatural spirit" name calling, compounded by those "proto-rabbinic tactics" of concealment and misdirection, compounded by callous and most unpriestly sarcasm, compounded by the тαℓмυdic spirit of pogrom, what kind of example does the novus-SSPX intend to give? A reminder that Judas was a bishop?

I see no alter-Christus in the inner circle, only sinful pride, pro-Zionist despotism, lasciviousness, and Judaic hypocrisy and vengeance. Might as well move to our "friend" Israel and let them spit on us, snipe our children while they play, and rain white phosphorous on our innocent families. Hell is where the unrepentant murderers of souls go—a place of never-ending torment for those who would deny the sacraments to us.

Recall that the first rule of exorcism is to have NO conversation with the demons lest the exorcist is taken over by the demons. From the mouths of the inner circle we know that they have had plenty of conversation with the enemies of God. Look what it got them—and us.