Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX Priest Backpedals on Kauffman Case  (Read 13517 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: SSPX Priest Backpedals on Kauffman Case
« Reply #30 on: February 26, 2021, 11:53:29 PM »
2)  It's all about you then, Carissima, isn't it?  Not about scores, maybe hundreds, of sspx youngsters who have been victimized by sspx priests.  Not about sspx leaders who have covered up for these priests.
What makes it all about me? Because I attend Mass and receive valid Sacraments from priests of the SSPX? Am I supposed to boycott the priest God has sent me because there are corrupt priests in the same organization he is a part of? Am I culpable for the bad things that happened to victims of evil Shepards?
I have said it here before, I don’t leave my children alone with priests, and I have never had an inappropriate friendship with any priest, so therefore being a victim of one myself, or my children, would be much more unlikely. In many of the SSPX abuse cases presented, these were the fatal flaws and why there were victims of these predators in the first place.
If I left my child alone with a family member that victimized them, I would first blame myself. As their parent and guardian it is natural to do so. These people instead blame an ‘organization’, and more than likely, for the potential financial compensations available from litigation against them, or to join in the continued smear campaign against the Catholic Church and Her prelates. 

Re: SSPX Priest Backpedals on Kauffman Case
« Reply #31 on: February 27, 2021, 07:59:27 AM »
Most of us called BS on Kauffman's story for the same reasons described here, the nonsensical insanity about Fr. having a key and regularly assaulting her against her will while she didn't take even the slightest measures to make it stop.

This actually underscores that, despite Voris' recent endorsement of the #metoo movement, where every single allegation is treated as truth, sometimes people make crap up and cause damage.  Although Arzuaga appears to have sinned against his vow of chastity, a consensual affair and rape are two different matters, and the SSPX was wrongly smeared for "ignoring" rapes.

Was a year of penance a "slap on the wrist"?  Not sure, since we don't know all the details.  I probably would have suspended him from ministry for longer than that.  But it's not as if nothing was done.
No. A priest who breaks his vow or promise should be removed consensual or not.  And clergy who protected and knew should be removed too.  Stop with protecting these sɛҳuąƖ predators.   The year vacation doesn’t work.   Instead of watching them like a hawk, they should defrock these perverts because they were unfit for the priesthood.  Most sɛҳuąƖ predators will never repent and stop sinning.  
After watching Father John Oconner video, it seems that traditional Catholic groups are in mortal sin of sơdơmy starting with the seminary as it is with novus Ordo and before novus Ordo.  






Re: SSPX Priest Backpedals on Kauffman Case
« Reply #32 on: February 27, 2021, 08:12:50 AM »
No. You boycott the priest who is in state of mortal sin.  You write letters and emails until the bad priest is removed. 

Many good men left seminaries to have families because many seminaries and schools were loaded with sodomites. Sodomites are ruling the world. 

History is repeating itself.  Remaining and silent to mortal is why the Church is in crisis.  
You shouldn’t receive sacraments, if you don’t stand up against the mortal sin within any religious order or dioceses or your own parish or diocese. 

Who loves the masks?  Sodomites.   Who is getting a kickback for the jabs?  Sodomites.  Who worships themselves and mudder earth? Sodomites.  Who closes Churches and schools? Sodomites.  

Vatican is sodomite city.  The Sspx was too quick to join the seat of the one of the anti christs who worships mudder earth.  

We need more manly priests like late Father John Oconner who defended the faith in the 1980s. 







Re: SSPX Priest Backpedals on Kauffman Case
« Reply #33 on: February 27, 2021, 09:04:25 AM »
If the SSPX truly wants their faithful’s spiritual & financial support, then Fr. Pagliarani should be pressured into presenting an annual, “State of the Society” report.

This would include open discussions on relations with Rome, financial resources and priestly assignments.

The SSPX has operated for decades like a black-ops corporation.

It is not the Church and it IS accountable to it’s remnant Catholic flock.

Too often, SSPX scandals, like zionist lawyers starting shell corporations or sɛҳuąƖ improprieties come out through rumors which have to be investigated by Resistance trads in order to bring sunshine onto the occurrences & accusations.

In most cases problems do exist and the SSPX’s initial response is to sweep it under the rug.

Disgression in most cases is reasonable.

But gone are the days when an  SSPX superior can say, “Stay off the internet”. OR “I don’t have answer you, because my grace of state allows me to make an independent decision” (Fr. Griego).

We understand that the SSPX is founded from an “Old World” culture, but Catholics don’t have to accept their old world arrogance and abuse of power.


Re: SSPX Priest Backpedals on Kauffman Case
« Reply #34 on: February 27, 2021, 10:06:35 AM »
No. A priest who breaks his vow or promise should be removed consensual or not.  And clergy who protected and knew should be removed too.  Stop with protecting these sɛҳuąƖ predators.   The year vacation doesn’t work.   Instead of watching them like a hawk, they should defrock these perverts because they were unfit for the priesthood.  Most sɛҳuąƖ predators will never repent and stop sinning.  
After watching Father John Oconner video, it seems that traditional Catholic groups are in mortal sin of sơdơmy starting with the seminary as it is with novus Ordo and before novus Ordo.  
Agree 100%
There is no excuse these priests that offend so grievously are still in business anywhere in the world. Whether they offend on purpose, or by weakness. 
And it is a grave failure on the part of the Superiors of the SSPX to not remove and defrock these wicked men.
Those Superiors are either worldly priests and bishops suffering from human respect for there confreres, or, they are infiltrators that work for Satan. Probably a mixture of both. 
Other Catholic organizations are suffering under the same disorders as well.