Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5

Author Topic: SSPX News babe?  (Read 8789 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Incredulous

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8901
  • Reputation: +8675/-849
  • Gender: Male
SSPX News babe?
« on: January 23, 2018, 10:49:40 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!0


    • It is a modern phenomenon.  With the turn of a new year, Father Wegner unveils another re-branding project.

    This time, the PR message uses a "career gal" news-anchor, to report on the exciting world of the SSPX.



    Give it some time, since the SSPX has only recently entered the Conciliar mainstream.

    Eventually, Father will catch-up to the level of sophistication achieved by EWTN... "Reporting live, from the Vatican!"

    SSPX News
    Logged
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #1 on: January 23, 2018, 11:23:13 PM »
  • Thanks!15
  • No Thanks!1
    • This is masculinized attire for a woman. It has meaning behind it and it is done in purpose. The "business suit" is not proper dress for a traditional Catholic lady. It denotes a feminist desire of competitiveness in the outside world, the world of men, instead of domesticity and nurturing behavior. This is not a good role model for girls and I am surprised that the SSPX is sinking this low nowadays.

    As Pope Pius XII said in his allocution on Fashion:

    Quote
    “One cannot minimize the importance of style's influence for good or for evil. The language of clothing, as we have already said, is the more effective when it is more ordinary and is understood by everyone. It might be said that society speaks through the clothing it wears. Through its clothing it reveals its secret aspirations and uses it, at least in part, to build or destroy its future.”  



     
    Logged
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Maria Regina

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3776
    • Reputation: +1004/-551
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #2 on: January 24, 2018, 01:36:50 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    •  The news from Rome on this SSPX website is all positive. Not surprising.
    Logged
    Lord have mercy.

    Offline stgobnait

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1346
    • Reputation: +941/-65
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #3 on: January 24, 2018, 02:59:46 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    •  ???  Speechless!
    Logged

    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #4 on: January 24, 2018, 03:34:28 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • hilarious!
    These people are blind, and being punished for their blindness.
    Logged
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #5 on: January 24, 2018, 07:35:05 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • I was surprised to see Cantarella's post has received as many thumbs-down as it has thumbs-up (thus far).

    Rhetorically, I would love to know from the thumbs-downers:

    1) Are you SSPXers?

    2) What precisely are you objecting to?

    3) If you are a woman, do you wear pants in the home?

    Genuinely interested in your responses (and I promise not to respond; just trying to understand).

    If you do not want to say anything openly, maybe you could respond in the Anonymous forum?
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +1323/-87
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #6 on: January 24, 2018, 07:50:59 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: SeanJohnson on January 24, 2018, 07:35:05 AM
    I was surprised to see Cantarella's post has received as many thumbs-down as it has thumbs-up (thus far).

    Rhetorically, I would love to know from the thumbs-downers:

    1) Are you SSPXers?

    2) What precisely are you objecting to?

    3) If you are a woman, do you wear pants in the home?

    Genuinely interested in your responses (and I promise not to respond; just trying to understand).

    If you do not want to say anything openly, maybe you could respond in the Anonymous forum?
    I was somewhat surprised too, as this is a Resistance forum, so I thought most would agree with Cantarella.
    Logged

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41839
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #7 on: January 24, 2018, 08:04:19 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • Wow.  There are no words.

    Apart from Cantarella's objections, which are spot on, the SSPX is a PRIESTLY Society and should not have a woman doing PR type reports for them.  They don't have enough priests who could act as spokesmen for the Society?

    Plus, I find her style highly annoying.  She doesn't know what to do with her hands.  In addition, she has a very undignified (for a religious program) manner of speaking.  I don't care for her tone of voice and facial expressions ... all of which speak to her being a modern woman.

    Not to mention that the use of "News Babes" is a well known tactic to get viewers to watch for less-than-wholesome reasons.  Perhaps they're trying to attract the interest of young men as prospective seminarians?

    :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:

    I've always objected to how EWTN tried to be "too cool" in making themselves seem slick according to the standards of modern society ... but that SSPX would succuмb to this?  This tells me all I need to know about the NeoSSPX.
    Logged

    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +1323/-87
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #8 on: January 24, 2018, 08:08:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Some more commentary from Non Possumus: http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/
    Logged

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41839
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #9 on: January 24, 2018, 08:13:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mr G on January 24, 2018, 08:08:15 AM
    Some more commentary from Non Possumus: http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/

    Great commentary.  It's not just the feminism ... but the overall worldliness and secularism (outrageously expensive seminary, picture of seminarians adoring the Mercedes Benz, all repugnant).

    Maybe the SSPX is going to use these "News Babes" to attract the right kind of young man to fill their new seminary.  Perhaps they'll even have some of these woman floating around the seminary to make it interesting.
    Logged

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #10 on: January 24, 2018, 08:36:08 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Does not surprise me. Any organization that teaches their seminarians that EENS means that anyone can be saved in any religion by their belief in a God that rewards, will swallow any camel. She likely is not even an SSPXer
    Logged
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #11 on: January 24, 2018, 08:38:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Next they'll have a teenager in skinny jeans
    Logged
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41839
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #12 on: January 24, 2018, 08:48:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Last Tradhican on January 24, 2018, 08:36:08 AM
    She likely is not even an SSPXer

    That was my guess also.
    Logged

    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +1323/-87
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #13 on: January 24, 2018, 08:50:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Last Tradhican on January 24, 2018, 08:36:08 AM
    Does not surprise me. Any organization that teaches their seminarians that EENS means that anyone can be saved in any religion by their belief in a God that rewards, will swallow any camel. She likely is not even an SSPXer
    I think she does go to the SSPX parish in St. Marys, but I am not 100% certain as there is so many people here but she does look familiar.
    But as you said in a previous post, it is the worldliness that is the problem. Once these priests keep silent on the worldliness, then it (worldliness) flows right in.
    This might explain what is actually going on: https://tradidi.com/sspx/liberalism-and-catholicism-the-missing-appendix 
    " We can define liberalism in a word: fear. Let it be clear that I am not talking about cowardice. Many liberals have been the bravest and the most chivalrous of men. They were not afraid for themselves, certainly, but rather, for the Church herself. Certainly such an attitude can only be honorable, even touching. But also, it must be said, it is somewhat injudicious, even disrespectful, and even, I am obliged to say, un-Christian. Undoubtedly they would have given their lives to save the Church. That is very good. But it would have been much better, and more realistic, not to tremble for her and not to believe so easily that she needed them so.
    They warn that, unless their ideas are accepted, all is lost: religion, the Church. The modern world, they warn, will turn its back on the Catholics, and all will be lost. The Catholics must not blunder, they must make themselves liked, they must not lose their reputation. Catholics must not antagonize the modern world, and so on..."


    "It is this very fear, the foundation of liberalism and of present-day apologetics, that tends to insinuate into the clergy a new spirit. Such is the voice of the new school: it is necessary to go along to get along. The Church must bring herself up to date. If not, she is lost. It is high time to see to it."
    Logged

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX News babe?
    « Reply #14 on: January 24, 2018, 09:03:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mr G on January 24, 2018, 08:50:27 AM
    " We can define liberalism in a word: fear. Let it be clear that I am not talking about cowardice. Many liberals have been the bravest and the most chivalrous of men. They were not afraid for themselves, certainly, but rather, for the Church herself. Certainly such an attitude can only be honorable, even touching. But also, it must be said, it is somewhat injudicious, even disrespectful, and even, I am obliged to say, un-Christian. Undoubtedly they would have given their lives to save the Church. That is very good. But it would have been much better, and more realistic, not to tremble for her and not to believe so easily that she needed them so.
    They warn that, unless their ideas are accepted, all is lost: religion, the Church. The modern world, they warn, will turn its back on the Catholics, and all will be lost. The Catholics must not blunder, they must make themselves liked, they must not lose their reputation. Catholics must not antagonize the modern world, and so on..."


    "It is this very fear, the foundation of liberalism and of present-day apologetics, that tends to insinuate into the clergy a new spirit. Such is the voice of the new school: it is necessary to go along to get along. The Church must bring herself up to date. If not, she is lost. It is high time to see to it."
    I disagree completely, liberalism has nothing to do with chivalry, it is just the result of denying God's Grace. It's that simple. 
    Logged
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24
    Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
    « previous next »