I was also surprised at the thumbs down on Cantarella's post.  What gives.  It makes you wonder who is reading this forum?  Feminism is rampant in the "traditional" circles.  I know in St. Mary's Kansas they have an on site female college counselor.  She is there for all the "ladies" who are interested in College.  She can help you apply and figure out your housing situation.  I'm sure no one is surprised. I'm not.  

This is masculinized attire for a woman. It has meaning behind it and it is done in purpose. The "business suit" is not proper dress for a traditional Catholic lady. It denotes a feminist desire of competitiveness in the outside world, the world of men, instead of domesticity and nurturing behavior. This is not a good role model for girls and I am surprised that the SSPX is sinking this low nowadays.

As Pope Pius XII said in his allocution on Fashion:



 

Indeed.
Lots of ladies in the Resistance wear pants and allow their daughters to do so.
Sets a bad example. 

The female "News Anchor" says towards the end of the video (in reference to +ABL).."when he found the society in order to preserve the priesthood." 

I wonder if this is the new motto of the SSPX, in that the real reason for the existence of the SSPX is to preserve the order of priesthood.

Maybe they also mistakenly believe that the priesthood can be preserved by reconciling with Modernist Rome. 

Well, once again I stop by semi-monthly to see if there is any real news here and once again I come across a bunch of low IQ, narrow-minded, knee-jerk reactionaries anxious to drink the blood of fellow traditional Catholics.

I shall have to disabuse you bumpkins. Both the young man and the young lady are traditional Catholics and very fine ones. The young man is not Jim Vogel, and I won't name the young lady because you are very strange and uncharitable people who I wouldn't trust not to try to contact her and let her know first hand how stupid you really  are. And for those of you who had such nasty criticisms for their appearances, I would love to see what you look like! I can only imagine.

You people should be thoroughly ashamed. I will remember you in my Masses and rosaries. This is so very sad to me, knowing these two youngsters as I do, one of them born into tradition to a fine traditional family.

I, for one, am not so concerned with the young lady's appearance. Her apparel and demeanor are fine. 

What concerns me is the content. The young lady mentions twice about the SSPX priesthood, and she says toward the end that +ABL formed the Society in order to preserve the priesthood. That's true to a certain extent, but it quickly became clear to the Archbishop that in order to maintain the priesthood, that he would have to stand up for truth, which meant standing against the Council and Modernist Rome.

Where, in the video, does the young lady say anything about the Council or Modernist Rome?
It would seem that the SSPX no longer believes in saying anything against the Council or Modernist Rome. Why is that?

It seems that they are now just about maintaining the priesthood, and the TLM, and certain aspects of Tradition. And they appear to have given up the greater battle that +ABL fought.

What I find interesting about the video regarding the seminary in Germany is that the seminarians do not mention that the Novus Ordo is a danger to the faith. They simply say they do not like it’s protestant orientation. No more do they speak of it as leading to heresy or the cause of great sacrilege.  Now they prefer the Traditional Latin Mass; as I prefer steak over peanut butter and jelly.

No more is the Novus Ordo a “poisoned soup” to be avoided at all costs for danger of death, but rather a soup of lesser quality, that is simply not preferred.

Sad indeed!

http://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/sspx-seminary-zaitzkofen-germany-produces-video-following-life-seminarian-34569

Well, once again I stop by semi-monthly to see if there is any real news here and once again I come across a bunch of low IQ, narrow-minded, knee-jerk reactionaries anxious to drink the blood of fellow traditional Catholics.

I shall have to disabuse you bumpkins. Both the young man and the young lady are traditional Catholics and very fine ones. The young man is not Jim Vogel, and I won't name the young lady because you are very strange and uncharitable people who I wouldn't trust not to try to contact her and let her know first hand how stupid you really  are. And for those of you who had such nasty criticisms for their appearances, I would love to see what you look like! I can only imagine.

You people should be thoroughly ashamed. I will remember you in my Masses and rosaries. This is so very sad to me, knowing these two youngsters as I do, one of them born into tradition to a fine traditional family.

What did you say here?

"... anxious to drink the blood of fellow traditional Catholics."

 Why would you compare us to blood libel Jєωs and St. Mary's youngsters to innocent Gentiles?

    If you know these two youngsters and are from St. Mary's, then I suspect you also know how the SSPX started out there in the
    1970s?  It was a humble beginning right?  Many families lived in trailers.  
   
    I suppose for those suffering from the St. Mary's bunker mentality, they wouldn't know that Fr. Wegener re-branded your  
    religious order?  They wouldn't notice all the modernist compromises and how proud the SSPX has become?

You may be ashamed of us.
But we're incredulous of how you and your fellow St. Mary's Catholics allowed Menzingen to sell you down the river, and how you insist on remaining oblivious to it?