It's a dєαdlу cult now attempting to destroy it's members.
It's a dєαdlу cult now attempting to destroy it's members.
| "And Jesus answering, said to them: Take heed that no man seduce you:" [Matthew 24:4 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=24&l=4#x)] |
| "For many will come in my name saying, I am Christ: and they will seduce many." [Matthew 24:5 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=24&l=5#x)] |
| "And many false prophets shall rise, and shall seduce many." [Matthew 24:11 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=24&l=11#x)] |
| "For there will rise up false Christs and false prophets, and they shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce (if it were possible) even the elect." [Mark 13:22 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=48&ch=13&l=22#x)] |
| "For they that are such, serve not Christ our Lord, but their own belly; and by pleasing speeches and good words, seduce the hearts of the innocent." [Romans 16:18 (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=52&ch=16&l=18#x)] |
But what about Father Robinson? Before the lσcкdσωns , he was fighting against mandated ναccιnєs for homeschoolers.You are right!
Comparing the SSPX saying its not inherently sinful to take the ναccιnє to a Jonestown cult that actively encouraged people to commit ѕυιcιdє is a massive stretch.
I don't think I believe the ναccιnє is OK to take, even if I was convinced it was theoretically acceptable I would still have enough good sense to not take it. Is the SSPX really "encouraging" taking this ναccιnє?
You have to distinguish, at the least, between that, and just an allowance that reception would be theoretically not sinful.
And again, I'm not condoning their position. I'm just saying be fair
вιℓℓ gαтeѕ Blasted as "ναccιnє Criminal" in Italian Parliament - The New American (https://thenewamerican.com/bill-gates-blasted-as-ναccιnє-criminal-in-italian-parliament/)
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/thenewamerican.com.ico) (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=african%20catholic%20bishops%20gates%20ναccιnєs+site:thenewamerican.com&t=iphone)https://thenewamerican.com/bill-gates-blasted-as-ναccιnє-criminal-in-italian-parliament/ (https://thenewamerican.com/bill-gates-blasted-as-ναccιnє-criminal-in-italian-parliament/)
In particular, MP Cunial slammed Gates-funded ναccιnєschemes that she said had "sterilized millions of women in African" and paralyzed about 500,000 children in India.
https://tinyurl.com/app6jvcv (https://tinyurl.com/app6jvcv)
But what about Father Robinson? Before the lσcкdσωns , he was fighting against mandated ναccιnєs for homeschoolers.
It was actually Flavor Aid not Kool Aid as many wrongly believe
In Jones town, 100% of the "faithful" who drank cyanide-laced Kool Aide died. But spiritually, they were dead already.
In the SSPX, their faithful are hopefully spiritually alive, but those who willingly take the ναccιnє, become spiritually dead.
And their physically death risk shoots off the charts.
Is it a mortal sin to freely accept, a bloodstream injection of fetal tissue from murdered babies ? Yes.
The SSPX can be held responsible for the sins committed by others in the following ways:
1. By counsel from the pulpit (“It's morally okay to take the ναccιnє”)
2. By command (“It is your duty of state to accept the ναccιnє ”)
3. By consent (“I understand you needed to comply to get ναccιnαted")
5. By praise or flattery (“Good you went ahead and got ναccιnαted”)
6. By concealment (“Don't worry… no one needs to know you were vaxxed.”)
7. By partaking (“I'll help you make a vaccination appointment.”)
8. By silence (“I won't discourage him from taking the ναccιnє.”)
9. By defense of the sinful action (“He had to get vaxxed to save his job.”)
Consider that the death counts from the global genocide vaccination plan will make Jones town look like a demonic lab experiment.
You need to specify which Fr. Robinson, SSPX you're referring to. There are two.Father Kevin Robinson.
Fr. Kevin Robinson is older. He was in San Antonio for a while.
Fr. Paul Robinson is from Kentucky, in his mid-40's, ordained around 2006 (3 years training under +Williamson, and 3 years under Fr. Le Roux) and he was the one who seems to be extremely pro-science to the point of justifying some Theistic evolution.
It was actually Flavor Aid not Kool Aid as many wrongly believeDuring the Vatican’s state of apostasy, the Sspx reconciles and joins an. imposter Church.
Bishop Williamson was right as time goes on our civilization gets dumber , Its proven to be true. The society of SSPX has shown its true colors as far as their theologians go on this CÖVÌD ναccιnє. What happened to the great defenders of human life like FR. PAUL MARX of HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL and Doctor JEROME LE JUNE ? No longer do we have great men of our time to guide the mass of Catholics WITH AUTHORITY. WITH SOUND MORAL DECISIONS YOU CAN RELY ON.
(http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130403191038/memoryalpha/en/images/c/c6/Q_as_Borg.jpg)(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.CTJSjcSSGRzg81z_UdRYLAAAAA?pid=ImgDet&rs=1)
WE ARE THE BORG-OLIO
ALL CATHOLICS MUST ASSIMILATED INTO THE CONCILIAR COLLECTIVE
WE WILL ADD YOUR OBJECTIVISM TO OUR MODERNIST RELATIVISM
AND EVERYONE WILL BE HAPPY AND GOOD AND NICE
RESISTANCE TO THE STRAWBERRY FIELDS WHERE THERE IS THE SOUND OF MUSIC IS FUTILE
For the sake of prudence and the welfare of the priest, perhaps his name should be removed from the post above mine. While I am sure Father is willing to be persecuted for the truth, it need not come to pass due to someone seeing those particular words posted online.Yes.
For the sake of prudence and the welfare of the priest, perhaps his name should be removed from the post above mine. While I am sure Father is willing to be persecuted for the truth, it need not come to pass due to someone seeing those particular words posted online.You're right. For some reason I can't modify my post though, or delete it.