Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants  (Read 9250 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jvk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 721
  • Reputation: +683/-17
  • Gender: Female
Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
« Reply #45 on: March 14, 2019, 02:23:30 PM »
  • Thanks!7
  • No Thanks!0
    • Wow.  I can't believe those comments are coming from Traditional Catholic women!  Really?!

    Wasn't it Padre Pio who refused to hear the confessions of any woman not wearing a skirt at least 8 inches below the knee?

    And what about the standards of Marian dress?  Do they seriously think the Blessed Virgin would wear pants because it's more modest in the cold wind?

    I heard a sermon once (by an SSPX priest--many years ago, of course!) in which it was said, "If a woman says she has to wear pants to do a job, SHE SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT!"

    Logged

    Offline Caraffa

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 989
    • Reputation: +558/-47
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #46 on: March 14, 2019, 02:57:08 PM »
  • Thanks!6
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Matthew on March 14, 2019, 09:35:41 AM

    Lucia Alperin No doubt, but women wearing slacks to work, especially in wintertime, is not even close to a serious issue in Catholicism. I’m going to guess you’re also upset that the women were working outside the home?

    Lucia Alperin Thank you for reminding me to be thankful the rank resistance is OUT of the SSPX. Thank you Our Lady for sweeping.


    Logged
    Pray for me, always.

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2940
    • Reputation: +1090/-2220
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #47 on: March 14, 2019, 03:31:50 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mr G on March 14, 2019, 02:16:09 PM
    That is  a good question, who are they? It could be that they are not even parishioners but outsiders hired to do the job. (I suspect they are the accounting staff, as none of those names are familiar). Notice only Mrs. Rydholm and Mrs. Shepard are the only ones that mention their previous years with the SSPX (and to the best of my memory, they are not in the picture).
    "Corporate SSPX" is truly what this organization has become.
    That's been my assumption too, that they were outsiders. In the facebook pages, too. In my own personal experience, people who are raised in the SSPX know what Catholic modesty is.

    At the same time, it should've dawned on them to know the standards of modesty and for the workplace to tell them.
    Logged
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...

    Offline Seraphina

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2929
    • Reputation: +2048/-184
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #48 on: March 14, 2019, 03:33:51 PM »
  • Thanks!7
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: jvk on March 14, 2019, 02:23:30 PM

    I heard a sermon once (by an SSPX priest--many years ago, of course!) in which it was said, "If a woman says she has to wear pants to do a job, SHE SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT!"
    If you're referring to a woman having to wear the style skirts, dresses, shoes, pantyhose that are modest, then I disagree.  Think of the pioneer women, the many missionary sisters working in remote places in the times before Fatima.  The types of work they did are largely not possible to perform in modern attire without gross immodesty.  The women who lived before 1900 wore dresses and skirts and performed all sorts of work without immodesty or difficulty.  The hemlines were long, skirts wide, bodices long sleeved and up to the neck line.  There was no fear of leaning over to reveal one's cleavage.  Stockings, bloomers and slips or under-dresses were worn beneath skirts.  Over the clothing, many working women wore full or skirt covering aprons. Shoes were sensible; no spike or platform soles, no squished toes, no flip flops.  IOW, women could do just about anything without giving scandal.  
    When I lived as an exchange student on a farm, I wore nothing but Amish-appearing clothes.  I've done chores from house painting to stacking hay bales.  There was no need for pants.  
    Certainly in an office, there is NO reason at all to offend Our Lord and scandalize others by donning male apparel!
    I go tenting, hiking, and have climbed Mt. Washington and Mt. Katahdin while wearing a skirt.  I had no problem.
    There is really no excuse for those young women to dress as men in an office.  What do they do?  Lie on the floor to repair the copy machine?  Stand on their desks to do.......?  Women, even Trad women need to be educated 
    Logged

    Offline SusanneT

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 305
    • Reputation: +144/-27
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #49 on: March 14, 2019, 07:17:10 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: jvk on March 14, 2019, 02:23:30 PM
    Wow.  I can't believe those comments are coming from Traditional Catholic women!  Really?!

    Wasn't it Padre Pio who refused to hear the confessions of any woman not wearing a skirt at least 8 inches below the knee?

    And what about the standards of Marian dress?  Do they seriously think the Blessed Virgin would wear pants because it's more modest in the cold wind?

    I heard a sermon once (by an SSPX priest--many years ago, of course!) in which it was said, "If a woman says she has to wear pants to do a job, SHE SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT!"
    Well said ! Agreed on all counts. 
    Logged

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #50 on: March 15, 2019, 08:35:59 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Maria Regina on March 14, 2019, 11:05:07 AM
    Sadly,  the local stores do not sell slips anymore.  I have to make my own underskirts, and I make them of cotton or even flannel when the weather is frigid outside. When the wind blows, without wearing an underskirt, it can reveal too much. Yes, I wear long skirts all the time.

    It's good that you make your own underskirts. I buy mine from the Vermont Country Store online catalogue. They are one of the few who still sell them. And wool tights, too, which are also difficult to find elsewhere.

    I'm so surprised that all of the women in the SSPX office wear pants. They should not have changed that photo; it's not really honest to do so. The women there wear pants, and they shouldn't try to hide the fact. I feel sorry for any of the women there who would rather wear a skirt or dress, but they might feel out of place in doing so. Women tend to want to fit in with other women.
    Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline St Paul

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 151
    • Reputation: +144/-63
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #51 on: March 15, 2019, 10:53:43 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: cosmas on March 14, 2019, 10:52:29 AM
    SSPX Leadership has been feminized. They are worried about political correctness. They don't want to be men ,they want to just get along . lets not make waves. Human Respect is what they are after. They are no longer striving to please Our Lord. They like being modern its easier than being Catholic. The path of least resistance.
    Pay attention who the men of the sspx chapels oogle.  It's not, typically, the modest females.  Ergo, the females dress to "get a man," based on what the men seem to chase.
    Logged

    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2784
    • Reputation: +2885/-512
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #52 on: March 15, 2019, 11:07:48 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0

    • The topic of tradiional women wearing pants in the district office began to bore me some 1900 views ago. But, because it was Meg, I did happen to glance at her last post, viz.


    Quote
    It's good that you make your own underskirts. I buy mine from the Vermont Country Store online catalogue. They are one of the few who still sell them. And wool tights, too, which are also difficult to find elsewhere.

    Maybe Meg will start making her own under garments when she finds out that Vermont Country Store has been advertising and selling adult toys and other sex paraphernalia since at least 2009. Oh yes, this wholesome, homespun business enterprise has apparently succuмbed to the demands of the present age.

    Check the following link: https://www.mynbc5.com/article/vermont-country-store-offering-adult-toys/3289164
    The article begins: “The Vermont Country Store's usually squeaky-clean image took a hit recently when the longtime local chain decided to cater to its older customers by selling vibrators, sex creams and "instructional" sex videos not far from shelves containing children's toys….”

    Meg, I think, maybe, the Chosen may have inserted themselves into yet another lucrative business opportunity. When and if SSPX district employees are found to be purchasing items other than warm winter wear from Vermont Country Store, it should trigger a topic that will be guaranteed to get 10,000 views. That would be a conservative estimate.


    Logged

    Offline ihsv

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 690
    • Reputation: +931/-118
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #53 on: March 15, 2019, 11:14:20 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!1
    • One of the ladies from the District HQ is triggered by this conversation and appears to be down thumbing most of the posts in this thread.   :laugh1:

    I wonder if she'll go running for her safe-space if everyone up-voted all the posts in this thread.  
    Logged
    Confiteor unum baptisma in remissionem peccatorum. - Nicene Creed

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #54 on: March 15, 2019, 11:17:11 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: hollingsworth on March 15, 2019, 11:07:48 AM
    The topic of tradiional women wearing pants in the district office began to bore me some 1900 views ago. But, because it was Meg, I did happen to glance at her last post, viz.


    Maybe Meg will start making her own under garments when she finds out that Vermont Country Store has been advertising and selling adult toys and other sex paraphernalia since at least 2009. Oh yes, this wholesome, homespun business enterprise has apparently succuмbed to the demands of the present age.

    Check the following link: https://www.mynbc5.com/article/vermont-country-store-offering-adult-toys/3289164
    The article begins: “The Vermont Country Store's usually squeaky-clean image took a hit recently when the longtime local chain decided to cater to its older customers by selling vibrators, sex creams and "instructional" sex videos not far from shelves containing children's toys….”

    Meg, I think, maybe, the Chosen may have inserted themselves into yet another lucrative business opportunity. When and if SSPX district employees are found to be purchasing items other than warm winter wear from Vermont Country Store, it should trigger a topic that will be guaranteed to get 10,000 views. That would be a conservative estimate.

    I do recall seeing that they sold that horrid type of thing in the past, I but I haven't seen it in their catalogue for awhile. Mind you, I don't go looking for it either, so maybe they still sell that type of stuff.

    You're right. It's not good to buy from a store that promotes that type of sin. I should start making my own garments. Maybe it's time to dust off my sewing machine and make use of it, instead of being lazy and buying those garments.
    Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Kazimierz

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7386
    • Reputation: +3487/-87
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #55 on: March 15, 2019, 03:59:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • There can be had very modest and beautiful attire for ladies for grand occasions. (I purchased my Knights Templar attire from this company.)

    Something about the medieval times.......Christendom, knights, fair maidens, Aquinas.......



    Logged
    Da pacem Domine in diebus nostris
    Qui non est alius
    Qui pugnet pro nobis
    Nisi  tu Deus noster

    Offline Vintagewife3

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 700
    • Reputation: +328/-356
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #56 on: March 15, 2019, 05:12:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Amazon has good slips too! 
    Logged

    Offline Seraphina

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2929
    • Reputation: +2048/-184
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #57 on: March 16, 2019, 01:49:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Please, ladies, let's move this discussion of slips and undergarments to Women Only.  I doubt the gentlemen wish to read about it, plus we've gotten way off-topic from the thread title.  I'm adding my 2c, but look for it on Women Only.
    Logged

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16436
    • Reputation: +4863/-1803
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #58 on: March 16, 2019, 06:00:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    •  :jumping2:Tomorrow is the wearing of the green!
    Logged
    May God bless you and keep you

    Offline wallflower

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1866
    • Reputation: +1983/-96
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX memory holes pic of District Office women in pants
    « Reply #59 on: March 17, 2019, 03:52:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

    • I find the monitoring of CI incredibly creepy.
    Logged
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
    « previous next »