I posted this news item on a couple Facebook groups related to Traditional Catholics, the Tridentine Mass, etc.

Here are some comments from a Facebook group for Traditional Catholics -- most of whom (at least of those participating in this discussion) are SSPX parishioners. I'll give you a hint: It's all over. They have gone completely liberal. They don't have a clue.

Seriously: I've been in the Resistance since day one. But I was still shocked to see how low these liberals have sunk. Men, you have to watch out. EVERY LAST ONE OF THESE WOMEN grace a TLM chapel every Sunday, putting themselves forward as Traditional Catholics. When they were/are single, they were/are putting themselves forward as a potential Trad Catholic spouse. BEWARE!


Rachel Valencia It is MORE IMMORAL to BEND DOWN and have ppl see EVERYTHING there is to see, than to wear pants, MANY women I know wear them in good feminist taste. CULTIST!

Lucia Alperin No doubt, but women wearing slacks to work, especially in wintertime, is not even close to a serious issue in Catholicism. I’m going to guess you’re also upset that the women were working outside the home?

Lucia Alperin Thank you for reminding me to be thankful the rank resistance is OUT of the SSPX. Thank you Our Lady for sweeping.

DiesIrae Confutatis Lacrimosa What's wring with wearing pants?

Melissa Ward Pants was a more modest way to dress here in Kansas than the skirts....winds are crazy.(my skirt was long and straight enough to not flip up.) ..
So, I stand with the SSPX and I'm watching the resistance without a hierarchy much of any form dissolve bit by bit.
Wealthy contributors happen. I do not see pants as an issue. ...Not best.. not sinful. (skin tight..blah blah blah... Okay i'd agree venially sinful..intent needs to be there for mortal sin. ... Control of your temptations and your eyes are on you. )

I'm surprised how many women use the excuse "I wear pants because it's more modest." and/or "I have varicose veins".

WHAT?

So STEP ONE is establishing that skirts should only go to the knee. STEP TWO is moving those women to pants once they no longer want to show off their legs. What kind of crap is that?

NEWSFLASH: Skirts/dresses come in all lengths, including the famous Trad (well, apparently now it's mostly Mormon and fundie Protestant) ankle-length skirt. When paired with socks you have plenty good coverage (as opposed to bare feet -- here in Texas very few women wear socks -- including to work or to church. They wear glorified sandals and flip-flops showing off their bare feet)

These women need to go back to the beginning and re-learn how to dress. No, skirts should not be short or knee-length. And you can fool yourself (though it's pathetic), but you can't fool God.

I posted this news item on a couple Facebook groups related to Traditional Catholics, the Tridentine Mass, etc.

Here are some comments from a Facebook group for Traditional Catholics -- most of whom (at least of those participating in this discussion) are SSPX parishioners. I'll give you a hint: It's all over. They have gone completely liberal. They don't have a clue.

Seriously: I've been in the Resistance since day one. But I was still shocked to see how low these liberals have sunk. Men, you have to watch out. EVERY LAST ONE OF THESE WOMEN grace a TLM chapel every Sunday, putting themselves forward as Traditional Catholics. When they were/are single, they were/are putting themselves forward as a potential Trad Catholic spouse. BEWARE!


Rachel Valencia It is MORE IMMORAL to BEND DOWN and have ppl see EVERYTHING there is to see, than to wear pants, MANY women I know wear them in good feminist taste. CULTIST!

Lucia Alperin No doubt, but women wearing slacks to work, especially in wintertime, is not even close to a serious issue in Catholicism. I’m going to guess you’re also upset that the women were working outside the home?

Lucia Alperin Thank you for reminding me to be thankful the rank resistance is OUT of the SSPX. Thank you Our Lady for sweeping.

DiesIrae Confutatis Lacrimosa What's wring with wearing pants?

Melissa Ward Pants was a more modest way to dress here in Kansas than the skirts....winds are crazy.(my skirt was long and straight enough to not flip up.) ..
So, I stand with the SSPX and I'm watching the resistance without a hierarchy much of any form dissolve bit by bit.
Wealthy contributors happen. I do not see pants as an issue. ...Not best.. not sinful. (skin tight..blah blah blah... Okay i'd agree venially sinful..intent needs to be there for mortal sin. ... Control of your temptations and your eyes are on you. )

Those are some crazy quotes. But they are helpful, as it clearly shows that the SSPX of today is a completely different organization that I remember.
I wonder how long have they been attending SSPX Masses? Are they the influx of Novus Ordo sent to corrupt morals, or are they long time formerly silent SSPX liberals that are now free to speak out, or were they Traditional back in the day and have since become 'slack'?

Claiming that Our Lady is their ally (in their fight for pants, against dresses/skirts) is really rich. I think the reality is quite the opposite.

And the one suggesting skirts are always short needs to read my post above. She is just an idiot; sorry there are no other words for it.

They sound like typical Liberals.

Oh, the feminists are everywhere, even in the new-sspx.  I had to laugh (sadly) at the modernism in this comment: 

winds are crazy.(my skirt was long and straight enough to not flip up.)

Skirts are SUPPOSED to be that long/straight ALL THE TIME.  If you're wearing a skirt that isn't modest when you bend over or can't handle some wind, then IT'S NOT A MODEST SKIRT.

Oh, the feminists are everywhere, even in the new-sspx.  I had to laugh (sadly) at the modernism in this comment:

Skirts are SUPPOSED to be that long/straight ALL THE TIME.  If you're wearing a skirt that isn't modest when you bend over or can't handle some wind, then IT'S NOT A MODEST SKIRT.

I agree, but I should clarify: there are many ankle-length skirts that are light material or flowing -- very concealing, very feminine, very pretty -- but in strong wind could be a problem without a slip or some kind of garment worn underneath.

But these are far preferable to pants, which hug the woman's figure "full time" and show off if she has a small butt, a medium butt, or a big butt.

Skirts are always more flattering for a woman.

I can't believe how pants have become the de-facto standard, and not just any pants, but usually you have to squeeze into them, so it's like they're sprayed on. Ridiculous.

And like I said in another thread, when men wear jeans or pants the pants don't show every curve on their big butt. Men don't have butts (to put it simply). The pants just kind of hang there. A guy's butt is about as wide as his waist. It doesn't stick out the sides at all; he has no hips. At least no real hips, or birthin' hips.

one question I have is "Who the heck are these folks?  2 of my sons are out at RC house every two weeks and I recognize NONE of these people.  I've known tons of folks that worked out there, including my old roommate, their old Attorney, James Wright.  Never seen these people ever out there OR at St. Vincent's, the closest sspx parish.  Call it what it is, it's not neo-sspx, it's corporate sspx.  It is a damn money making enterprise straight up.