But Hollingsworth is right.

Even if the SSPX called a meeting, and had their District Office women wear only skirts/dresses to the office from now on, it would only be a "minor setback" on the steady onward march towards full acceptance by the Modern World.

That onward march is the problem, not this or that small symptom.

Will you spot the subtle discrepancies between these two pages ?

6/27/2015 :

https://web.archive.org/web/20150627074716/http://laportelatine.org/district/ecoles/activitesecoles/lycee_technique_philibert_vrau/benedictions_cloches_la_martinerie_mgr_fellay_150621/benedictions_cloches_la_martinerie_mgr_fellay_150621.php

7/6/2015

https://web.archive.org/web/20150706011226/http://laportelatine.org/district/ecoles/activitesecoles/lycee_technique_philibert_vrau/benedictions_cloches_la_martinerie_mgr_fellay_150621/benedictions_cloches_la_martinerie_mgr_fellay_150621.php

The girl in the blue "skirt" is missing.  

Removing the picture doesn't alter the fact that she was dressed immodestly and actually took part in the ceremony.

But it does provide further evidence of the neoSSPX's Orwellian machinations. Obviously they need to step up the surveillance at neosspxminitrue.

That onward march is the problem, not this or that small symptom.

 
Yes. It is an onward march, on the part of the Society, back to a “church” which the Archbishop one time described as a church to which he no longer wished to belong. ABL declared that its Episcopal ranks were full of “anti- Christs.” He concluded that it was an “apostate” church, led by men who were themselves apostates, men with names like Kasper, McCarrick, Pell, O’Brien, Law, and Montini.

 
This is the “church” with which Pagliarani, Fellay, Phluger, and Schmidberger, are presently negotiating, seeking feverishly for any way that might lead to practical reunification. What a fool’s errand they are on.
The so-called pope with whom they are dealing is probably an anti-pope. He may not even be a Catholic. But he is certainly a heretic. Of that there can be no doubt.

The SSPX has made its bed, and now they must lie in it. Short skirts and female staff in pants are the least of their problems.

You don't say!
They simply removed the 2 pictures with the woman in the short skirt in them. Count the images on each page.

The top link has 9 images.
The bottom link has only 7 images.

I misunderstood. I thought the OP was claiming the pictures were Photoshopped. This makes much more sense now. :)

What is really disturbing is that SSPX would allow pro sodomite clubs.  

Are you referring to St Don Bosco school in Calgary?