I might point out that one's actions and words can often logically be EQUIVALENT to various sentences, which are actually never uttered.
For example, John Paul II had the pan-religious meeting in Assisi in 1986. All the "religions" were respected.
JP2 never actually said, "One religion is as good as another", but his actions screamed it out loud and clear. A person retorting, "But he never actually said that..." wouldn't get far.
If I shoot a man dead, isn't it equivalent (and even MORE) than merely saying, "he doesn't deserve to live"?
In other words, there is such a thing as a "logical conclusion".
If John Doe makes a prediction that "the US Dollar is going to lose 75% of its value this year, another 75% of that value the following year, and then a further 75% of what's left the 3rd year." would it be inaccurate to say, "John Doe predicts the dollar is going to become worthless."? No, that's the logical conclusion of what he's saying.