The Traditional Roman Hymnal in general is good, but not great. Some of the popular wording of hymns have unsingable tunes. I agree that a new edition should be in order. I know that in some of the SSPX chapels, they supplement the TRH with other hymnals, or make their own hymnals!
By the way, I recall that TRH was published by the Canadian District, not Angelus Press.
1. Yes, it's not perfect, but it was "something". At least it had the popular Kyries, and many good hymns. What bothers me is that they've replaced it with *nothing*. The old TRH was certainly better than *nothing*.
2. Yes, it was produced by the Canadian district -- but that's still the SSPX. And now the entire SSPX (all districts, plus Angelus Press) have decided to drop the project altogether, as if the Church doesn't need a real Catholic hymnal...
We can argue about whether or not the Conciliar Church is Catholic, and we can give the benefit of the doubt to the individuals who attend the Novus Ordo. But the "Catholicity" of their
hymnals isn't open for debate -- they are completely non-Catholic.
When it comes to hymnals, we can completely write off the Conciliar Church.
We can debate whether the Novus Ordo Mass gives grace. Novus Ordo hymns do NOT give "Catholic sense", but rather "protestant sense". If anyone stays Catholic in the Novus Ordo it is DESPITE the hymns, not because of them.
Next point: Does any other Trad group have an in-print hymnal? It doesn't have to be the SSPX.
If none of them do, then the CATHOLIC CHURCH doesn't have an in-print Hymnal right now. That's why I started this thread -- it's pretty serious!I know, we're in a Crisis -- but a Crisis that's lasted 45 years and we (Traditional Catholics) collectively have quite a few resources, including publishing resources. We, the remnant, have managed to produce countless other necessary Catholic books (The Summa, Liber Usualis, Denzinger, hand missals, Baltimore Catechism, Douay-Rheims Bible, etc.)