Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope  (Read 1978 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2026, 09:07:15 PM »
60. This truth means that no one can be saved without Christ and His Church, through a false religion as such, nor be assured of His salvation outside the visible structure of the Church. If men are saved without belonging to the visible society which is the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, it is by a supernatural ordination to the one Church of salvation, and in spite of the errors of the false religions in which they find themselves, from which they free themselves by not refusing the grace offered to them and by corresponding to it


This would cover a young protestant who has been validly baptized and believes what is necessary about the Faith but does not yet understand the difference between the true Church and the sect he is in, and does not hate or reject anything he shouldn't.

If you admit BOD-BOB, this would cover an atheist who is converted by a sermon he hears on the radio, but dies before he makes inquiries for being admitted for catechism classes the next morning; or, is killed by his atheist roommate upon declaring his intent to do so.

If you don't agree with the examples I listed, refer to those who have been to the Society seminary as to what the Society thinks on this point. I consider it the standard statement of Trent as understood by non-feeneyites, as far as my understanding goes.

Offline DirigeNos

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2026, 10:11:15 PM »
haha - every thread gradually turns into a debate on feeneyism. 


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2026, 10:29:11 PM »
Hmm...

Yeah, their profession of faith is a profession of THE VERY FOUDATIONAL ERROR THAT CAUSED THIS CRISIS IN THE FIRST PLACE.

sigh

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope
« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2026, 10:37:09 PM »
haha - every thread gradually turns into a debate on feeneyism.

Well, until the dunderheaded morons realize that the new soteriology led to the new ecclesiology, which in turn lay at the root of all the Vatican II errors, from subsistence ecclesiology, to ecuмenism, to the notion of "separated brethren" ... and then also to subjectivizec criterria for salvation, where as long as you THINK (even erroneously) that you serve God, that subjective good will and sincerity can be salvific.  It's a stinking pile of manure that 95% of Tradtards of knee deep in, since they've been conditioned in Pavlovian fashion to foam at the mouth with the very mention of EENS, declaring Father Feeney to be a greater heresiarch than Bergoglio.

It's extremely pathetic, and it's why Tradism is whithering away ...

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2026, 10:46:05 PM »
I mean ... it's so simple that a child can figure it out, and you don't need 6 years in Trad seminary.

MAJOR:  No Salvation Outside the Church.  [Dogma -- defined multiple times]
MINOR:  Heretics, schismatics, Jews, Muslims, pagans CAN be saved somehow. [held by most Trads]
CONCLUSION:  Heretics, schismatics, Jews, Muslims, pagans can be IN the Church somehow.

Conclusion is unavoidable for those who adhere to the Minor, short of denying Catholic dogma.

So, then ... what is this Church that can include not only actual Catholics who are members of the Church and visibly belong to it, and yet can also include and have within various heretics, schismatics, Jews, Muslims, pagans, etc. ... who are visibly separated from the Church?  Why it's the Church which SUBSISTS in the Catholic Church (as the visible core) but which is not co-extensive with her visible boundaries.  So, then truly, these folks ARE our "separated brethren", brethren (formally) because they are in the same Church with us, whether they know it or not, and are therefore infused with the supernatural life of the Holy Trinity, but separated (materially), visibly, since they have various doctrinal differences and fall short of that fullness of truth that actual Catholics have.

Then, since we please God and save our souls by following even erroneous consciences, then, since we have a right to please God and to save our souls, then we have right to follow our (even erroneous) consciences.  In fact, if we attempt to impede people from following said consciences, we imperil their salvation and can cause them to displease God ... which of course borders upon blasphemy.  And yet ... here we have most Tradtards buying into it hook, line, and sinker, essentially embracing the same doctrinal errors as Vatican II, but merely holding on to their smells and bells.