Author Topic: SSPX invites Fr. Kilcawley Expert on Theology of The Body, from Lincoln, Diocese (Read 10166 times)

apollo · « **Reply #35 on:** September 11, 2019, 03:53:57 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on September 11, 2019, 02:03:45 PM

Private revelation means nothing. And the Catholic principle is that in matters of interpreting Scripture the Church Fathers are the standard unless proven otherwise.

.
Interpreting the Scriptures means speculating about who the unknown woman is ?
.
I don't think so.
.
And before you say it so me (as usual), I say it to you:
You are an imbecile.
.
And if you are Matthew's friend, Matthew is an imbecile also.
.
The Church fathers were wrong about Geocentrism, so they should
stay out of the business of speculation and other matters that don't
pertain to the Faith.
.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #36 on:** September 11, 2019, 04:56:34 PM »

Quote from: apollo on September 11, 2019, 03:53:57 PM

And before you say it so me (as usual), I say it to you:
You are an imbecile.
.
And if you are Matthew's friend, Matthew is an imbecile also.

I'd rather be an imbecile than an arrogant Modernist like yourself.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #37 on:** September 11, 2019, 04:59:38 PM »

Quote from: apollo on September 11, 2019, 03:49:04 PM

Anne Catherine Emmerick means nothing?
Mary of Agreda means nothing?

Correct. They mean nothing from the standpoint of deriving theological conclusions from them.

1) Nobody knows for sure if they wrote everything in the works attributed to them.

2) Even if the visions are genuine, it's difficult to separate actual private revelation from interjections from their own minds.

There's a reason the Church fell short of canonizing them. It's because the Church did not wish to implicitly endorse everything in these works.

I'll go with the consensus of the Church Fathers, and Pope St. Gregory the Great, first. Even many otherwise-Modernist sources have come to the conclusion that the woman is most likely St. Mary Magdalene.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #38 on:** September 11, 2019, 05:05:56 PM »

Quote from: apollo on September 11, 2019, 03:53:57 PM

The Church fathers were wrong about Geocentrism, so they should
stay out of the business of speculation and other matters that don't
pertain to the Faith.
.

Well, pagan sun god,

#1) they were not wrong about Geocentrism. Your self-proclaimed "slam-dunk" arguments against Geocentrism were easily debunked, and you merely demonstrated your bad will and your ignorance. One argument got debunked, so you pulled out another one ... a pattern that exposes bad will.

#2) this insulting disrespectful language used toward the Church Fathers exposes you as the impious scoundrel that you are ... "they should stay out of the business of". Who do you think you are? You're the one who needs to stay out of that business. Actual Catholics revere and respect their teachings and even their speculations.

Quo vadis Domine · « **Reply #39 on:** September 11, 2019, 09:08:21 PM »

Quote from: apollo on September 11, 2019, 03:49:04 PM

Anne Catherine Emmerick means nothing?
Mary of Agreda means nothing?
Nothing??
.
Then what do you mean?
.
Less than nothing.

You obviously have no clue about Church teaching nor the teaching Church. In the scope of things, both of these lady’s have no standing when it comes to authoritative writing.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: SSPX invites Fr. Kilcawley Expert on Theology of The Body, from Lincoln, Diocese (Read 10166 times)

apollo

Re: SSPX invites Fr. Kilcawley Expert on Theology of The Body, from Lincoln, Diocese

Ladislaus

Re: SSPX invites Fr. Kilcawley Expert on Theology of The Body, from Lincoln, Diocese

Ladislaus

Re: SSPX invites Fr. Kilcawley Expert on Theology of The Body, from Lincoln, Diocese

Ladislaus

Re: SSPX invites Fr. Kilcawley Expert on Theology of The Body, from Lincoln, Diocese

Quo vadis Domine

Re: SSPX invites Fr. Kilcawley Expert on Theology of The Body, from Lincoln, Diocese