Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX invites Fr. Kilcawley Expert on Theology of The Body, from Lincoln, Diocese  (Read 10190 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
.
Not Mary Magdalene !!!
.

That's the Modernist position.  Even Kilcawley thinks it's probably St. Mary Magdalene.  Church Fathers traditionally held this woman to have been Mary Magdalene.

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
Here is a sample of Kilcawley.  Is this Catholic or Protestant?  I can't tell which.
.

Made it to 16 seconds - definitely protestant.


Instead of co-Ed immodest Theology of body sex education maybe they should teach basic catechism.   It seems many young people don’t know the faith and if they do they don’t live it.  

First of all, Catholics don’t have sex.  They make love. 

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Here is a sample of Kilcawley.  Is this Catholic or Protestant?  I can't tell which.
.

Well, he quotes Francis and John Paul II a lot ... so, Protestant.   :laugh1:

Actually, there's a lot of decent content there mixed in with the bad.  Why can't a Traditional priest distill this and re-present it through a Traditional Catholic lense?

That's the Modernist position.  Even Kilcawley thinks it's probably St. Mary Magdalene.  Church Fathers traditionally held this woman to have been Mary Magdalene.
.
It's NOT Mary Magdalene.  Private revelation says it's NOT.
.
The Bible does not say who it is.  What's modernist about
having it be another woman ?
.
Why does every adulterous woman in the Bible have to be
Mary Magdalene ? 
.
Church fathers can be wrong on matters not pertaining to the Faith.
.