Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: SSPX hinting they will "Consecrate"  (Read 33471 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX hinting they will "Consecrate"
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2026, 07:29:54 PM »
Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora on January 15, 2026, 06:24:19 PM
I understand. However, the SSPX members who know better, should see this as a blessing in disguise. No good could come from a deal with Rome specially with a Prelature which would be compromised. If the leadership doesn't take decisive action soon, they could join one of the "Resistance" bishops and work with them.Just a thought.
It will be very hard for the leadership to go back against Rome because of the implications. Of approving the indult, of approving the new invalid rites, of needing Rome's permission for marriage casting doubt on those who got married before the agreement, of those who received Huonders invalid oils... And so much more.
Logged

Offline LeDeg

Re: SSPX hinting they will "Consecrate"
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2026, 07:33:00 PM »
Quote from: AnthonyPadua on January 15, 2026, 07:29:54 PM
It will be very hard for the leadership to go back against Rome because of the implications. Of approving the indult, of approving the new invalid rites, of needing Rome's permission for marriage casting doubt on those who got married before the agreement, of those who received Huonders invalid oils... And so much more.
Agreed. They don't have the excuses nor the stones to do it. 
Logged

Offline Minnesota

Re: SSPX hinting they will "Consecrate"
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2026, 08:02:52 PM »
Hinting? LOL. If they have yet to consecrate when they're left with 2 bishops, they never will. Their reticence will be their downfall. 
Logged

Offline Infirmus

Re: SSPX hinting they will "Consecrate"
« Reply #18 on: January 16, 2026, 05:42:55 AM »
Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora on January 12, 2026, 08:07:14 PM
I came across this article today:

https://infovaticana.com/en/2026/01/08/the-fsspx-does-not-rule-out-new-episcopal-consecrations-even-without-a-pontifical-mandate/

But when +Williamson consecrated +Faure, they said this:

Are the SSPX members putting pressure on the leadership? Or is the SSPX trying to put pressure on the Vatican? If they are serious about considering consecrating bishops without a pontifical mandate, they should apologize to the "resistance" and all the bishops consecrated by + Williamson. But they won't consecrate because they would loose all the conservatives they have gained from their compromise.
Pressure on the Vatican? They are working together, Fr Pagliriani only mentions no mandate consecration to give a false hope to the hardliners in the SSPX. Those who think that there are talks with Rome are nowhere near understanding what is going on. Rome dictates to the SSPX, period. Every move is a calculated move by Rome.
Logged

Offline Infirmus

Re: SSPX hinting they will "Consecrate"
« Reply #19 on: January 16, 2026, 05:57:09 AM »
Quote from: LakeEnjoyer on January 15, 2026, 09:19:48 AM

Was the consecration of Bishop Rangel (RIP) in 1991 a "last resort"?
My theory it was a calculated move to create a Pied Piper to lead Brazil to Rome. And they did go to Rome.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
« previous next »