Re the red text above, exactly what I was about to ask. Thanks for stating it clearly.
Would be interesting to post the unattributed quotes on the wall near the coffee and donuts, and then ask how many adults after Mass could name the actual author...

Good thought...
ESR wanted to sell a 3 part series of all the Sermons and talks of + Lefebvre, in French of course.
They announced that these would be on sale:
Unofficial...plain fishy!
https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-en-francais/valeurs-traditionnelles/msg1011709/#msg1011709Excerpt:
2011 AD. "...press release from EDITIONS SAINT-REMI
On March 23 we announced the publication of the Sermons of Mgr Lefebvre from 1971 to 1991. On March 29 at 5:30 p.m., without any prior warning, we received a summary summons for March 31, before the Paris court by the association Fraternité Sacerdotale Saint-Pie-X, to try to prohibit us from publishing the said Sermons. We await the judgment's deliberation next Wednesday.
We had the initiative to publish the 219 Sermons of Archbishop Lefebvre in their entirety on the occasion of March 25, 2011 for the 20th anniversary of his call to God, with the intention not only of honoring his memory, but also of delivering to the faithful, priests, younger generations, historians and researchers an objective docuмent, without cutting or censorship, which reveals the exact thoughts of the prelate, his evolution, his retractions and his claims over the past 20 years. We also wanted to propagate excellent sermons for the greater good of souls.
Therefore we naturally turned to the brother and sister of Mgr Lefebvre to talk to them about this project and we immediately obtained their warm written approval. Never in 20 years has the SSPX taken the trouble to publicize these sermons. Also, taking into account the fact that the few that FSSPX has published so far were, for some of them, amputated embarrassing passages, not to mention those that she refused to disseminate because they expressed positions opposite to those defended today by the SSPX of Mgr Fellay, we did not have to discuss [...faire part...] this with those who, publicly, betray Mgr Lefebvre's fight on two points:
- The abandonment of the denunciation of the conciliar church as being “a Masonic lodge” (see Mgr Lefebvre).
- The abandonment of the doctrinal question relating to the theological impossibility of a heretic being legitimately the Pope. Listen to Mgr Lefebvre himself on these two points (in 1976) (hurry up before this extract is deleted by an action of the SSPX!) (Deleted)
And in 1986 at the Easter sermon, to say: “What conclusion will we have to draw, perhaps in a few months, in the face of these repeated acts of communication to false cults? I don't know. I wonder. But it is possible that we are obliged to believe that this pope is not pope. Because it seems at first sight - I do not yet want to say it in a solemn and formal way - but it seems at first sight - that it is impossible for a pope to be a heretic publicly and formally. Our Lord promised him (Peter's successor) to be with him, to keep his faith, to keep him in the faith. How can the one to whom Our Lord promised to keep him in the faith definitively and without being able to wander in the faith, be at the same time publicly heretic and almost apostatized? This is a problem that concerns all of you, not just me. »
The publication of Mgr Lefebvre's sermons earned us a vast movement of sympathy from many faithful, hence the rage of the SSPX, which hastened to put pressure on the brother and sister of Mgr Lefebvre..."
_____________________
SSPX also brought Fr P. Schoonbroot to court...he died in a car accident. R.I.P. + There are posts re. this on CI.
Plus, the official seminarian>priest in charge of all recordings , wrote a certificate declaring that +L wanted the sermons, conferences etc to be made available for the faithful etc. I have a screen shot of that but I'm afraid of being sh*t