Was the SSPX teaching us wrongly for 40 years?  Was our worship defective all along?  Were we misled?  Are those few of us who still honor the old ways such an unbearable sign of contradiction that we must be snuffed out?  Is our example dangerous to preserving the status quo by serving as a reminder of the practice which once prevailed (in the same way the Winona seminary was)?

Is it possible that you tend to consider people have worse intentions than they do, and that there is some big conspiracy?

I'm not surprised Fr. Beck wanted the faithful to sing. The Beck family used to sell tapes of them singing. 

Fr. Le Roux may not have thought to learn local tradition, and would most likely prefer the traditions of his country instead, and by teaching the seminarians, they would then teach those traditions at the chapels they serve thinking that is how it's supposed to be done.

I admit it is frustrating. I'm confused now on what the faithful and servers should do because there has been so many changes over the years, and now there's a large family that likes serving the new seminary way, and leading hymns during mass, which breaks the peaceful silence. I think they are somewhat friendly to the NOM, but I've never known if hymns during Mass is normal for TLM. I think we used to only ever sing before and after.

As for noisy priests, Fr Post comes to mind, as well as a couple of others, who seem unable to properly whisper or they just don't care to. Any other Fr. Le Roux formed priest I can remember says the mass very quietly, even impossible to make out 90% of what they say if standing right next to them, though their "Dominus vobiscuм" and such is probably louder than it needs to be.

I would really like some videos and PDF copies of book sources showing/telling how low and high Mass were served and attended by the faithful, so I would have leverage to hold firm to what our traditions are.

There is no problem, though, with changing traditions for the better as long as it doesn't go against Church laws and Tradition. Fr. Le Roux likes to be practical, so it would not be surprising if he made a practical change, though some of what is practical is quite subjective and equally as good as other ways of doing things.

Fr. Le Roux may not have thought to learn local tradition, and would most likely prefer the traditions of his country instead, and by teaching the seminarians, they would then teach those traditions at the chapels they serve thinking that is how it's supposed to be done.

This is exactly the problem.

A missionary has to understand that he is on someone else's country.  You can't just get there and impose your own culture on people.

What is next? Is he going to make his sermons in French?

This is exactly the problem.

A missionary has to understand that he is on someone else's country.  You can't just get there and impose your own culture on people.

What is next? Is he going to make his sermons in French?

I hear sermons in French.   Oh, that’s because the Mass is in Quebec!  

French people, by and large, are snobs and think their way is the only way.  Europeans especially look down on American customs, both religious and non.

To be fair, while they are not snobs (at least not in the main), Americans think exactly the same way --- "our way is the only way".  They regard "foreign countries" as not worthy of learning anything about, and any travel they do to these countries is more along the lines of treating them either as holiday resorts or glorified theme parks.

I am neither, and I can tell you that Americans do have a somewhat bad name, but nothing beats the French.

I travelled once to Europe not so long ago. I was glad when I met Americans, because they were polite.

There was a funny incident in the flight from Florence to Paris, when a French woman noticed that we did not speak French (me and my wife). She looked genuined puzzled, like she simply could not understand how someone who didn't speak any French could go to Paris. Fortunately, we were there only for a flight connection.

I am neither, and I can tell you that Americans do have a somewhat bad name, but nothing beats the French.

I travelled once to Europe not so long ago. I was glad when I met Americans, because they were polite.

There was a funny incident in the flight from Florence to Paris, when a French woman noticed that we did not speak French (me and my wife). She looked genuined puzzled, like she simply could not understand how someone who didn't speak any French could go to Paris. Fortunately, we were there only for a flight connection.

I have visited French-speaking countries four times (France proper, St-Martin twice, and Quebec), and while I am a long way from being fluent in French (two years in college), I was able to conduct simple everyday transactions in French, and it was very much appreciated.  I only got stuck once, at a patisserie in Paris, when I ordered a croque-monsieur (delicieux!), the young lady at the counter asked me, in French, if I wanted it microwaved, and seeing my puzzlement, she whispered in English "microwave?".

They're not rude, they are just the same as Americans would be if the situation were reversed, if you can speak French, they appreciate it, just as an American service worker would prefer that foreigners use English if they can.