[Translation of Fr. Stephen Frey's entire article banning the use of the so-called "vax;" Original German-language article attached below]
Father Stefan Frey, FSSPX
District Superior of Austria
April 2021, p.6-9
Hardly any problem is currently burdening Christians and righteous people in general more than the question of the moral and medical value of the mass-CÖVÌD vaccination, whose operators and proponents pursue the declared aim to "ναccιnαte the whole of humanity" and do not shy away from direct or indirect coercion. If we look to Pope Francis or high-ranking prelates such as Archbishop Lackner, the president of the Austrian Bishops' Conference, we Catholics would have an ethical obligation to be ναccιnαted.
On the other hand, there are countless experts in all kinds of fields who warn very strongly against vaccination. Who should we believe? How can the individual in his or her specific situation make a wise, ethically justifiable decision?
Without being able to identify myself as a medical specialist, the task of pointing out the moral implications of vaccination and giving the faithful as clear an orientation as possible is incumbent upon us priests. In order to shed sufficient light on this complex question, we have worked closely with physicians, who, for their part, devoted weeks of intensive research. It should be noted at the outset: Most physicians are hardly informed about the more detailed interrelationships in the research and development of ναccιnєs and other drugs. Too much of what the pharmaceutical industry [does] is done in the darkness of secrecy and cover-up. It apparently takes the scandals to shed some light into the gruesome business of these people, such as the one a few years ago about organ trafficking by Planned Parenthood, the world's largest abortion provider. The group trafficked organs of aborted children to pharmaceutical companies on a massive scale. In order to make a moral evaluation of the CÖVÌD vaccination, at least the following problem areas must be illuminated problem areas must be illuminated:The origin of the ναccιnєs:
It is known that the research and development of current ναccιnєs have used embryonic cell lines derived from abortions allegedly performed decades in the past. This fact may not be too alarming. But if one knows about the more detailed background, namely that for the utilization of the developed organs of an embryo, the small child is taken alive out of the mother's womb, "slaughtered" alive and "disemboweled", so that the still living organs can be [harvested], and that this has systematically happened countless times and continues to happen, then the thing looks different. These facts, published several times in the past, could be dismissed as baseless allegations by cօռspιʀαcʏ theorists. Therefore it was necessary to substantiate this information by irrefutable evidence and proofs. Dr. Eva Maria Hobiger deserves the credit for having done this work, which is documented in the following article. Anyone who is ναccιnαted must be aware that she - willingly or forced - is co-financing and supporting the despicable maƈhınątions of an unscrupulous pharmaceutical industry and supports [it].The risk assessment:
More and more reports are coming in of serious side effects and already numerous deaths after receiving the CÖVÌD ναccιnє. How dangerous are these vaccinations? No one can answer this question. Permanent damage, possibly even even hereditary, cannot be ruled out. No one knows whether mass vaccination will not lead to a humanitarian catastrophe of global catastrophe. Dr. NormanZeelan a renowned specialist in this field and investigator in Germany, points out these dangers:
"It is indisputable that even the development and testing of an actual vaccination takes about 10 to 20 years. This time span can only be shortened, if one is in possession of a time machine ... There has never been a vaccination whose development and long-term observation [took] less than 4 to 5 years and did not end in a catastrophe. There should be billions of young, healthy people to a human experimentation with incalculable consequences, whereby it has not yet been [known] precisely what the benefit for themselves and others should consist at all."
Is it permissible to endanger one's own health and perhaps those of one's offspring to such serious risks- with no real discernible benefit? Doesn't the healthy human sensibility vehemently oppose this?Proportionality:
A year ago, we were confronted with the horror of a severe pandemic, comparable with the Spanish flu, which killed 50 to 100 million people in Europe. In the meantime, the [sic] long since given the all-clear. The figures from the Federal statistics for the year 2020 do not show mortality that exceeds that of previous years, but the disease is dangerous: the disease - like any average flu epidemic - is almost exclusively dangerous for the over-80 age group. How can such justify such serious measures and and risks to which the population is continuously exposed?In whose service is the vaccination?
Unfortunately, the evidence is mounting that the global vaccination campaign is in the service of a political agenda to bring humanity a nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, a socialist-style dictatorship that will take away privacy and freedom, but bring "equality and justice," "peace," and "security," as all dictatorships have said. Are we allowed to simply submit to such inhuman, anti-Christian ideas without without offering resistance?Conclusion and outlook:
If the four problem areas mentioned above also need to be to be deepened, I think we cannot avoid warning against the moral dubiousness of the current CÖVÌD vaccination and to urgently warn against undergoing the vaccination. I know that many are under severe vaccination pressures.
But it is always permissible to appeal to one's conscience and try to delay until one of the announced ναccιnєs are offered, which are based on based on proven conventional development methods and are are morally safe.
God's providence allows us to live in these difficult times. The all-knowing and all-good One knows what he may expect of us. In extraordinary trials, He offers us extraordinary graces so that we may prove ourselves. He wants us to live completely in union with our most gracious Savior and the mysteries of His Passion and Resurrection. May He grant you all perseverance, courage to resist and to suffer, but also with the unshakable joy of His holy Resurrection.
If the Most Blessed Virgin at Fatima predicted the worldwide spread of lҽϝƚιsƚ ideology, she also foretold Her final victory over them. Let us ask Mary for her guidance, for light and strength. In this spirit I wish you a blessed Holy Week and a joyful and grace-filled Easter.
-Fr. Stefan Frey