Author Topic: SSPX District notice concerning Ignis Ardens (Read 50004 times)

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #20 on:** May 01, 2011, 05:55:05 PM »

Quote from: TKGS

I suppose it's only a matter of time before CathInfo is anathematised by the Society.

It will just be yet another WRONG move by those in authority, or who pretend to have authority, whether in the Vatican, political circles or Traddieland.

The remedy is to quit screwing around and be honest and transparent. Instead, when they get caught doing something wrong or questionable, they try to turn the tables and suppress all discussion of their own stupidity/wickedness. IMO, the VAST majority of those who now occupy positions of power or pseudo-power will be utterly humiliated, if not literally destroyed, during the coming Chastisement. Almost to a man, they have failed to grasp the most rudimentary elements of the worldwide, ongoing lesson...

I'd love to see it work out differently, but things are not looking too good at the moment...

herbert · « **Reply #21 on:** May 01, 2011, 05:55:36 PM »

Quote from: Nemmersdorf

Another lucrative source of income from the SSPX: "We shall take you to Court!"

See the famous comedy, Les Plaideurs, the Litigants, by Jean Racine:

Monsieur Perrin Dandin….
Il nous veut tous juger les uns après les autres.
Il marmotte toujours certaines patenôtres
Où je ne comprends rien. Il veut, bon gré, mal gré,
Ne se coucher qu'en robe et qu'en bonnet carré.
Il fit couper la tête à son coq, de colère,
Pour l'avoir éveillé plus tard qu'à l'ordinaire ;
Il disait qu'un plaideur dont l'affaire allait mal
Avait graissé la patte à ce pauvre animal.

Mr. Perrin-Dandin… he wants to Judge us all one after the other. He is always muttering some nonsense that I don't understand. He wishes, at any cost, to sleep in his judge’s hat and robe. He had his rooster's head cut off, out of anger, for waking him up later than usual. He said that a litigant whose case (Bp W?) was looking dark had bribed the poor animal.

NEXT VICTIM? !!! :judge:

the last joke i posted was dirty (sorry!)

this one is clean, and TRUE!

Rooster 'owned' 68kg cocaine
From correspondents in Managua
April 23, 2004

A DEFENSE attorney whose client is facing cocaine charges has argued that the narcotics were actually in the possession of the suspect's rooster and two hens.

Prosecutors dismissed the claim as “absurd and impertinent.”

Police found 67.3kg of cocaine and a revolver hidden in a cage housing a fighting rooster and two hens in the parking lot of a cockfighting den controlled by Francisco Armando Rivera.

Rivera was arrested and charged with cocaine possession, but his lawyer, Manuel Urbina, said his client was never in possession of the narcotics.

“The drugs were in the possession of a rooster and two hens and the law is very clear that whoever is in possession of the drugs is the one who should be accused,” Urbina said.

Rivera has remained in prison while Judge Martha Lorena Martinez weighs the case against him. Urbina said that the prosecution must prove that the drugs actually belonged to his client.

“I'm going to order an inspection of this rooster and the two hens,” Rivera said.

In comments to reporters later, Attorney General Julio Centeno called the defense's case “an absurd joke.”

“I'm not going to comment further because we all know the only ones who can posses things are human beings,” he said.

The Associated Press

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #22 on:** May 01, 2011, 05:58:18 PM »

Quote from: herbert

the last joke i posted was dirty (sorry!)

It was vulgar, not dirty. There is a difference. Don't sweat it.

herbert · « **Reply #23 on:** May 01, 2011, 06:00:13 PM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

Quote from: herbert
the last joke i posted was dirty (sorry!)

It was vulgar, not dirty. There is a difference. Don't sweat it.

muchos gracias! :)

Nemmersdorf · « **Reply #24 on:** May 01, 2011, 06:02:17 PM »

Re:Posting from Hollingsworth:

"Clare posts a notice from a British SSPX District newsletter. Then she immediately locks the thread. Very good, Clare! I'll try to re-open it, but am not expecting much success."

"Fr. Morgan writes in part the following:
Whilst this file (Krahgate), which apparently originated elsewhere, was recently removed at the initiative of the Ignis Ardens moderator, the damage caused will be much more difficult to repair given the public nature of the internet and the propensity for calumny and detraction to spread.

In this regard Bishop Fellay does not exclude having recourse to judicial process, and this should serve a warning to those who think they can commit public slander via the internet with impunity.

Father Paul Morgan. "

Edited!
Another lucrative source of income FOR the SSPX: "We shall take you to Court!"

See the famous comedy, Les Plaideurs, the Litigants, by Jean Racine:

Monsieur Perrin Dandin….
Il nous veut tous juger les uns après les autres.
Il marmotte toujours certaines patenôtres
Où je ne comprends rien. Il veut, bon gré, mal gré,
Ne se coucher qu'en robe et qu'en bonnet carré.
Il fit couper la tête à son coq, de colère,
Pour l'avoir éveillé plus tard qu'à l'ordinaire ;
Il disait qu'un plaideur dont l'affaire allait mal
Avait graissé la patte à ce pauvre animal.

Mr. Perrin-Dandin… he wants to Judge us all one after the other. He is always muttering some nonsense that I don't understand. He wishes, at any cost, to sleep in his judge’s hat and robe. He had his rooster's head cut off, out of anger, for waking him up later than usual. He said that a litigant whose case (Bp W?) was looking dark had bribed the poor animal.

NEXT VICTIM? !!! :judge: