Author Topic: SSPX District notice concerning Ignis Ardens (Read 50064 times)

John Grace · « **on:** May 01, 2011, 10:40:16 AM »

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=7195

Quote

From the latest GB district newsletter:

QUOTE
IGNIS ARDENS

The Ignis Ardens website states that 'it is a Taditionalist Catholic forum with a pro-SSPX bias... but that 'this forum's support for SSPX is not to be taken as evidence of the SSPX's support for this forum.'

The latter part of this statement is certainly true with regard to Ignis Ardens' involvement to date in a campaign which undermines the authority of the Society's General House.

I refer to the section entitled 'Krahgate,' which, under the cover of anonymity, raises serious allegations against Menzingen's lawyer, Maximilian Krah, and, by extension, against the Superior General himself.

Whilst this file, which apparently originated elsewhere, was recently removed at the initiative of the Ignis Ardens moderator, the damage caused will be much more difficult to repair given the public nature of the internet and the propensity for calumny and detraction to spread.

In this regard Bishop Fellay does not exclude having recourse to judicial process, and this should serve a warning to those who think they can commit public slander via the internet with impunity.

Father Paul Morgan.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #1 on:** May 01, 2011, 10:47:47 AM »

:applause:

s2srea · « **Reply #2 on:** May 01, 2011, 10:52:23 AM »

sorry- i'm not up to date with this issue- anyone care to expand? Thanks in advance...

Telesphorus · « **Reply #3 on:** May 01, 2011, 10:58:37 AM »

I am curious how is it considered slander to say that someone who attends Jєωιѕн fundraisers is used by Bishop Fellay to represent the Society in the Williamson case, or slander to reveal that someone who publicly remarks that he is a fan of Madonna, 007, and the skin flick 9 1/2 weeks is on the board of SSPX girls schools.

These are simply facts. They are simply the truth, and the truth will set the SSPX free.

Certainly in a legal sense, there is no possible way this can be called slander or libel.

These are simply facts, and the any scandal or detraction that occurs because of the revelation of these facts is not a sin because the welfare and mission of the society depends on its leaders being held accountable for their actions.

Caminus · « **Reply #4 on:** May 01, 2011, 11:33:07 AM »

I can't find this statement on the GB website, can you provide a link?