Author Topic: SSPX District notice concerning Ignis Ardens (Read 50354 times)

John Grace · « **Reply #45 on:** May 22, 2011, 11:50:12 AM »

Whilst the note mentions calumny, I am of the understanding the reference to calumny is in reference to the internet in general. At no time in the note did it state the material in 'The Complete Krah File' is false. Bishop Fellay may not being liked questioned or answering questions but certainly can't use the term calumny.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #46 on:** May 22, 2011, 07:08:22 PM »

Use of the 'calumny charge' is but a scare tactic meant to silence those who have reasonable concerns and questions. BF knows darn well he'd be nailed to the wall if he actually had to prove it in a court of law. IMO, a court is the LAST place he'd want to be, as it would provide an 'uncontrollable' platform for those he means to silence.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #47 on:** May 22, 2011, 07:13:39 PM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

Use of the 'calumny charge' is but a scare tactic meant to silence those who have reasonable concerns and questions. BF knows darn well he'd be nailed to the wall if he actually had to prove it in a court of law. IMO, a court is the LAST place he'd want to be, as it would provide an 'uncontrollable' platform for those he means to silence.

In England it's different.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #48 on:** May 22, 2011, 07:18:53 PM »

Could you be less specific?

John Grace · « **Reply #49 on:** May 23, 2011, 10:31:56 AM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

Use of the 'calumny charge' is but a scare tactic meant to silence those who have reasonable concerns and questions. BF knows darn well he'd be nailed to the wall if he actually had to prove it in a court of law. IMO, a court is the LAST place he'd want to be, as it would provide an 'uncontrollable' platform for those he means to silence.

Exactly. Well said,gladius_veritatis