Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: M and Liz on June 28, 2018, 09:12:55 PM

Title: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: M and Liz on June 28, 2018, 09:12:55 PM
SSPX Deathwish
By
Sean Johnson
6/28/18
 
“What is important is that there no longer be rejection in their hearts…gradually, we must expect further steps…like concelebration.”
-Fr. Georges Cottier, after his triumph over Campos
 
 
Introduction:
On June 27, diocesan priest and retired US Navy chaplain, Fr. Kevin Cusick, announced the following on Twitter:
BREAKING: For the first time a SSPX priest joins annual @MilArchUSA (https://twitter.com/MilArchUSA) discernment retreat for prospective active duty military chaplains. (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_edn1)
Yes, you got that right: An SSPX priest (with the apparent consent of his superiors!) is off to a 5-day retreat to consider a conciliar vocation in the US military chaplaincy.
Let that sink in a bit.
Doesn’t sound right?
There must be some mistake?
No, there is no mistake.
The Military Archdiocese of the United States has its own website, and on it you will find this announcement:
Priests attending the June 25-29 retreat are from the dioceses of Burlington, VT; Winona-Rochester, MN; and Marquette, MI; and the Legionnaires of Christ, the Congregation of Jesus and Mary, the Society of St. Pius X, and the Congregation of the Missions.[ii] (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_edn2)
In case you wondered just what, precisely, might take place at such a retreat, the US Military Archdiocese was kind enough to give some interesting details:
Staying at the Theological College in Northeast Washington, the priests will gather daily for prayer and the Eucharist…The highlight of the gathering will come on Thursday in the Pentagon Memorial Chapel at the 9/11 crash site, where the priests will concelebrate Mass.[iii] (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_edn3)
Feeling a bit faint?
Still hanging onto the hope of some explanation which will make it all better?
You had better sit down.
 
Conversation with a Military Chaplain:
Shocked and appalled at the flagrant liberalism, I too held within myself the hope of some kind of satisfying explanation:
Perhaps this priest imagines himself to be able to enter the Military Archdiocese and celebrate only the traditional Latin Mass, use exclusively the other traditional sacraments, and so on and so forth.
Yes, surely he had a conversation with Archbishop Broglio,[iv] (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_edn4)and they came to some kind of understanding!  But wait, that would make this SSPX priest just an indult priest…
Not wanting to speculate any further, I called an old local acquaintance who just happens to be a military chaplain for the last 20+ years (and is also a local indult priest with friends in the US District).
Surely he is the man to ask, and indeed he was.
So I called him.
But what he had to say was not encouraging:
·        All US Catholic military chaplains are subordinate to Archbishop Broglio, while still belonging to their home dioceses or religious orders [i.e., If this priest were to decide to actually join the Military Archdiocese, effectively, the SSPX would agree to “lend” him to the Military Archdiocese, but he will continue to be a member of the SSPX.  Don’t lose sight of this critical point!];
 
·        If one is deployed on active duty [as this priest seems to be interested in doing], Archbishop Broglio’s influence over that priest will be more direct; if in the National Guard or Reserves, his home diocese or religious order will have more sway over him;
 
·        In order for an SSPX priest to join the military chaplaincy, he would be required to produce a letter from his superiors permitting it.  [This implies that if the US District is permitting this priest to consider this conciliar vocation, they are not opposed in principle to his exercising a conciliar apostolate; quite the opposite, as their explicit permission is required];
 
·        Archbishop Broglio gives an annual military chaplain vocation retreat, and this seems to be the one this SSPX priest is currently attending;
 
·        According to my acquaintance, (who, again, has been a military chaplain for decades), it is inconceivable that a priest would be admitted into the military chaplaincy, and be permitted to serve less than 1% of those identifying themselves as traditional Catholics; his commanding officers would consider him a “useless priest,” as they would be required to furnish an additional priest to serve the other 99% (which isn’t going to happen).
 
·        He says there is no precedent for any such arrangement anywhere in the US military chaplaincy, and considers it impossible, not only because of the objections of the various commanding officers, but also because of what he knows of Archbishop Broglio, who despite some conservative characteristics, is certainly not traditional (and as is explained in endnote #4, recently stated that he would “rather have no priests at all, than have traditional priests.”  Obviously, such a one would never tolerate this fantasized arrangement.
 
·        Consequently, my acquaintance stated that, if the report is true that an SSPX priest will be joining the chaplaincy, with the permission of the SSPX, he will definitely be saying the Novus Ordo on a regular basis (with any TLMs being the private exception).
 
 
Implications:
 
So let’s digest this all:
 
1)     At this moment, there is an SSPX priest participating in a conciliar retreat;
 
2)     In which he is attending a daily Novus Ordo Mass;
 
3)     Receiving Novus Ordo Communion;
 
4)     And who will be concelebrating the Novus Ordo Mass;
 
5)     With the permission of his SSPX superiors;
 
That’s appalling to any traditionalist who has not been damaged by the last 7 years of SSPX branding.
 
But it is still not the worst.
 
Have you figured it out yet?
 
It is this:
 
If this priest should decide to actually join the military chaplaincy, in which by all accounts he will be forced to celebrate predominantly the Novus Ordo Mass, while still remaining a member of the SSPX (albeit “loaned” out to the Military Archdiocese), and with the permission of his superiors, it will represent a new deplorable precedent in the history of the SSPX ralliement:
 
The SSPX will now have its first officially permitted bi-ritual priest.
 
And even if something should intervene to forestall this eventuality (and heaven knows it certainly won’t be the complaints of the anesthetized and boiled frogs in the pews!), there is no way to rewind the precedent already set:
 
The SSPX now allows their priests to attend conciliar retreats; to concelebrate; to actively participate in the Novus Ordo Mass,[v] (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_edn5)to receive Novus Ordo Communion.
 
But nothing has changed! 
 
We won’t compromise!
 
Rome must accept us as we are!
 
We have always been at war with Eastasia!
 
 
 
Conclusion:
 
There is still one escape hatch here for the SSPX: That this priest has determined to leave the SSPX, and consequently what is stated above all misses the target.
 
God, let it be so!
 
Please, let it be so!
 
But in that case, Fr. Cusick’s Tweet was extremely responsible, and the silence of the US District on this point would be so negligent in quashing what little scandal a branded faithful can muster, that it would certainly exonerate any “sour grapes” charges of “rash judgment.”
 
On the contrary!
 
In the old days, when high profile departures (voluntary or involuntary) from the SSPX hit the airwaves, the District sprung into action, and explained why the priest in questions’ reasonings were defective.
 
True, this priest is anonymous to most, but the Tweet made the case high profile, and if it were true that this priest was abandoning the SSPX for the conciliar Church (of which his own SSPX is now ¾ integrated into?).  Or is it that, after so much branding, the SSPX dare not publicly recount the reasons why such a course of action for this particular priest will be ruinous to his faith?
 
Come to think of it, does the SSPX even believe that anymore?



(http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_ednref1)https://twitter.com/MCITLFrAphorism/status/1012008843558178817 (https://twitter.com/MCITLFrAphorism/status/1012008843558178817)
[ii] (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_ednref2)https://archdioceseforthemilitaryservicesusa.createsend.com/campaigns/reports/viewCampaign.aspx?d=d&c=D7BF0B7039F8D419&ID=69A5447128F4E2712540EF23F30FEDED&temp=False&tx=0 (https://archdioceseforthemilitaryservicesusa.createsend.com/campaigns/reports/viewCampaign.aspx?d=d&c=D7BF0B7039F8D419&ID=69A5447128F4E2712540EF23F30FEDED&temp=False&tx=0)
[iii] (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_ednref3)Ibid.
[iv] (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_ednref4)Archbishop Broglio is the Archbishop in charge of all US Military Chaplains.  Incidentally, this is the same Archbishop Broglio who only a year ago stated that he would rather have no priests at all, then have a traditional priest!  See here: https://onepeterfive.com/military-archdiocese-better-no-priests-traditional-ones/ (https://onepeterfive.com/military-archdiocese-better-no-priests-traditional-ones/)  In other words, you can put to rest any wishful thinking about Archbishop Broglio carving out a traditional apostolate for this wayward SSPX priest.
[v] (http://file:///C:/Users/Barbara/Downloads/SSPX%20Deathwish.docx#_ednref5)Please save me the tired sophism that I defended the very same thing in Bishop Williamson: In that case, we were dealing with a distraught and only partially informed woman; in the present case, we are dealing with a priest, and one who -if we are to believe Menzingen that nothing has changed in the doctrinal formation of the SSPX seminaries- has been formed to know the evils inherent in the new Mass.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: 2Vermont on June 29, 2018, 07:43:26 AM

Also, according to the Novus Ordo Military Chaplain website, in order to qualify as a military chaplain, a priest "must have a minimum of two years of ordained ministry in a parish".  Does the Novus Ordo consider SSPX priestly ministry as ministry in a "parish"?  I didn't think so.  If not, what does that mean for this particular priest?  Would he have to go to a Novus Ordo parish first?   
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: AJNC on June 29, 2018, 07:53:54 AM
So much for all that Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi stuff.  
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Wessex on June 29, 2018, 09:08:54 AM
The SSPX within the military, battling the perversions of the day I suspect is not what is on the minds of trendy young prospective chaplains. From my experience of them, they crave the company of students and young men and the permissive climate to be found there.

But do not be surprised at what the partial-communion position of the Society is capable of accepting. Flexibility has been one of its characteristics.   
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: JPaul on June 29, 2018, 12:11:00 PM
The SSPX within the military, battling the perversions of the day I suspect is not what is on the minds of trendy young prospective chaplains. From my experience of them, they crave the company of students and young men and the permissive climate to be found there.

But do not be surprised at what the partial-communion position of the Society is capable of accepting. Flexibility has been one of its characteristics.  
This come as no surprise. The attitude of granting the conciliar church and the new order service legitimacy has been with the society since the beginning.  They swings between going along and resistance have over time grown much narrower and what remains of the original principles have softened.  Its too bad that so many Catholics have fallen asleep lulled by the every so often, updates on the Society's relations with Rome, a process that continues through Bishop Williamson's critical updates on the Society's relations with Rome. Same song, different verse. Honestly, how can you criticize this situation, when you are telling people they can nourish their faith at the Novus Ordo or the indult?.   Flexibility is actually weakness of principle and purpose.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Incredulous on June 29, 2018, 03:59:38 PM

Dear faithful... who will you believe?


Sean Johnson:

"The SSPX will now have its first officially permitted bi-ritual priest."


Fr. Niklaus Pfluger,
Speaking of the SSPX Resistance:
(http://fsspx.org/sites/sspx/files/styles/colorbox-big/public/pfluger.jpg?itok=VEM_aMew)

"Bold lies... quick to judge, groundless claims... con tricks, speaking contrary to justice and truth...
lost the spirit of our Founder"
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Incredulous on June 29, 2018, 04:05:57 PM
(http://sspx.org/sites/sspx/files/styles/colorbox-big/public/fr-wegner-christmas-message460b.jpg?itok=2HpiOkNx)
          "Tee hee... you American faithful are such dummkopfs!"
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: King Wenceslas on June 29, 2018, 05:40:03 PM

Stick a fork in SSPX and FSSP they are done, through, finished. They will all become conciliarists over time. Get out while you can! On to the catacombs.

This is all showing how truly great a man the Archbishop was.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Last Tradhican on June 30, 2018, 06:44:31 AM

 
Implications:
 

 
1)     At this moment, there is an SSPX priest participating in a conciliar retreat;
 
2)     In which he is attending a daily Novus Ordo Mass;
 
3)     Receiving Novus Ordo Communion;
 
4)     And who will be concelebrating the Novus Ordo Mass;
 
5)     With the permission of his SSPX superiors;





Very telling. The bar of my amazement at the SSPX's transformation in the Fraternity of St. Peter has been eclipsed again.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: songbird on June 30, 2018, 07:03:16 PM
Your Goose is cooked.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 01, 2018, 06:03:44 AM
The SSPX within the military, battling the perversions of the day I suspect is not what is on the minds of trendy young prospective chaplains. From my experience of them, they crave the company of students and young men and the permissive climate to be found there.

But do not be surprised at what the partial-communion position of the Society is capable of accepting. Flexibility has been one of its characteristics.  
Hey Wessex what IS your experience with military Chaplains?  
I’ve spent and am spending over 20 years in the military.  Not once, not once, have I met a chaplain as you described above.  Regardless of denomination, they have all been kind compassionate and even COURAGEOUS in the field of battle.  Some even risking their very lives to bring comfort and solice to those suffering both physically and spiritually.  If you feel “from your experience” that they seriously crave the company of young men what have you done to address this issue?  Who did you report this too?  What was your proof?
Every chaplain I’ve ever met have been true American Heroes who put themselves in harms way, even gunfire and frontline action, to pray with the wounded and ask for God’s grace.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 01, 2018, 06:15:18 AM
Last week I had to take two trains, two hours each way to get to the closest Latin Mass that I could find...and this was in northern ITALY of all places.  How wonderful would it be to have the True Mass right there on base?  

The Military NEEDS to have the Traditional Mass restored to it’s chapels. The chaplaincy makes exceptions for all denominations and all flavors of religion.  Let us pray that they allow this priest to enter the Chaplains Corps without compromising the Traditional Catholic faith.  Our men and woman in uniform DESPERATELY need it! 
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: TomGubbinsKimmage on July 01, 2018, 07:15:54 AM
Last week I had to take two trains, two hours each way to get to the closest Latin Mass that I could find...and this was in northern ITALY of all places.  How wonderful would it be to have the True Mass right there on base? 

The Military NEEDS to have the Traditional Mass restored to it’s chapels. The chaplaincy makes exceptions for all denominations and all flavors of religion.  Let us pray that they allow this priest to enter the Chaplains Corps without compromising the Traditional Catholic faith.  Our men and woman in uniform DESPERATELY need it!

Yes but not with the conciliar Church. They can register as a different group. "Traditional Catholic" or something like that.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: TomGubbinsKimmage on July 01, 2018, 07:17:56 AM
How does M and Liz know this is Sean Johnsons article?

It does not say it on the webpage.

Are you Mrs Johnson M an Liz?
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: M and Liz on July 01, 2018, 11:46:08 AM
Seriously? 

And truthfully I answer:
NO, I AM NOT MRS. JOHNSON.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: poche on July 02, 2018, 02:20:52 AM
The SSPX will now have its first officially permitted bi-ritual priest.
 We don't know that that is what the result would be. It could also be that there will be more opportunities for the military families to experience the TLM in circuмstances where it would ordinarily not be available. 
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Incredulous on July 02, 2018, 06:30:35 AM

Poche,

Your supposition means:

To have access to bring the 1962 hybrid mass to the military, the SSPX will officially accept the bastard mass.

Your lack of discernment is legendary :facepalm:
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: cathman7 on July 02, 2018, 09:21:05 AM
Here is a clarification from Archbishop Broglio in a message sent to Sean Johnson: 

Dear Mr. Johnson,
 
Father Cannon referred your message to me.
 
First of all, your characterization of my statement about priests of the two societies in communion with the Holy See and chaplaincy is simply incorrect.
My statement was that priests in the military must be able to be all things to all people and consequently must be able and willing to celebrate the Mass according to the Third Edition of the Roman Missal.
 
Secondly, without violating the confidentiality that a priest can expect from any diocese, I can make the following statements:
 
I missed the detail that the press released contained the names of the dioceses or religious communities of the participants.  Normally that information would not be published.  I regret my error.
 
It is unclear to me why you need the clarifications you requested.
 
Finally, the priest in question desires full communion with the Catholic Church.  I have helped many men and some families on that journey and I do not intend to stop now.
 
Thank you for your interest.
 
Sincerely in Christ,
+Timothy Broglio
 
The Most Reverend Timothy P. Broglio
Archbishop for the Military Services, USA
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: JPaul on July 02, 2018, 11:04:38 AM
The SSPX is a part of the conciliar apparatus now. This is a wasted thread. Can you tell us something that we don't already  know?
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: poche on July 02, 2018, 11:00:19 PM
Here is a clarification from Archbishop Broglio in a message sent to Sean Johnson:

Dear Mr. Johnson,
 
Father Cannon referred your message to me.
 
First of all, your characterization of my statement about priests of the two societies in communion with the Holy See and chaplaincy is simply incorrect.
My statement was that priests in the military must be able to be all things to all people and consequently must be able and willing to celebrate the Mass according to the Third Edition of the Roman Missal.
 
Secondly, without violating the confidentiality that a priest can expect from any diocese, I can make the following statements:
 
I missed the detail that the press released contained the names of the dioceses or religious communities of the participants.  Normally that information would not be published.  I regret my error.
 
It is unclear to me why you need the clarifications you requested.
 
Finally, the priest in question desires full communion with the Catholic Church.  I have helped many men and some families on that journey and I do not intend to stop now.
 
Thank you for your interest.
 
Sincerely in Christ,
+Timothy Broglio
 
The Most Reverend Timothy P. Broglio
Archbishop for the Military Services, USA
Could it be that this priest is leaving the SSPX?
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Wessex on July 03, 2018, 07:34:42 AM
Hey Wessex what IS your experience with military Chaplains?  
I’ve spent and am spending over 20 years in the military.  Not once, not once, have I met a chaplain as you described above.  Regardless of denomination, they have all been kind compassionate and even COURAGEOUS in the field of battle.  Some even risking their very lives to bring comfort and solice to those suffering both physically and spiritually.  If you feel “from your experience” that they seriously crave the company of young men what have you done to address this issue?  Who did you report this too?  What was your proof?
Every chaplain I’ve ever met have been true American Heroes who put themselves in harms way, even gunfire and frontline action, to pray with the wounded and ask for God’s grace.
Not so much the military but have ceased to be shocked at what passes for chaplains in UK universities. Going into these institutions would be a horror story for any follower of the true creed and with them adopting all the legalised gender perversions I cannot see any active traditionalist priest ever wanting or being allowed a place there. Which leads us to wonder about the type that would.
 
Your Hollywood version of men and chaplains under fire makes for good PR and political kudos. I know there is a school that believes warfare is good for its own sake because it can bring out the best in humans in extreme situations ..... but I think I would be asking too many questions for my own good. I am not happy with justifications like "saving the free world" or "preserving liberty" when the opposite seems to be the case. "God is on our side" was once a battle cry ..... but this wild assumption needs updating to have an equally dramatic psychological effect.  

Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Wessex on July 03, 2018, 07:41:53 AM
Last week I had to take two trains, two hours each way to get to the closest Latin Mass that I could find...and this was in northern ITALY of all places.  How wonderful would it be to have the True Mass right there on base?  

The Military NEEDS to have the Traditional Mass restored to it’s chapels. The chaplaincy makes exceptions for all denominations and all flavors of religion.  Let us pray that they allow this priest to enter the Chaplains Corps without compromising the Traditional Catholic faith.  Our men and woman in uniform DESPERATELY need it!
Would the "women in uniform" be wearing trousers to Mass?
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 03, 2018, 07:43:28 AM
Wessex, you owe an apology to all Military Chaplains that you recently besmirched.  By your very tongue you pretended to have knowledge of these Officers when in fact you had and have none.  Shame on you.  No “Hollywood Version” in my description, just cold hard facts!  True Heroes!  

Now go repent for your slander...shame...shame...shame!  You should be embarrassed!
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 03, 2018, 07:46:43 AM
Would the "women in uniform" be wearing trousers to Mass?
Shame on you!  Your lack of charity is repulsive.  Self righteousness is appalling.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: poche on July 03, 2018, 10:39:58 PM
Would the "women in uniform" be wearing trousers to Mass?
At least they are coming to mass. If they are on duty and they use their break time to go to mass then they are offering a sacrifice. We realize that that is not what is preferred but sometimes we all have to make little sacrifices to save our souls.      
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: St Ignatius on July 03, 2018, 11:20:34 PM
Shame on you!  Your lack of charity is repulsive.  Self righteousness is appalling.
A Nation that calls on It's woman to defend it's self, is not a Nation worthy of defence!
Before you go jumping my case like you did Wessex's, I do come from a military background. I probably would have persude a military career if it weren't for the perversion of "woman" being allowed to enter the military, and many other reasons as well... it was the primary reason for my father leaving it back in the 50's. What a perversion! 
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 05:20:17 AM
A Nation that calls on It's woman to defend it's self, is not a Nation worthy of defence!
Before you go jumping my case like you did Wessex's, I do come from a military background. I probably would have persude a military career if it weren't for the perversion of "woman" being allowed to enter the military, and many other reasons as well... it was the primary reason for my father leaving it back in the 50's. What a perversion!
The U.S. has NEVER “called on woman to defend itself”.  NEVER.  They were never included in any mandatory draft, not even during Vietnam. Thank goodness Patriotic woman have volunteered to serve in the military since the founding of this Nation.
Lessons learned from Vietnam was that the best military is a volunteer military.  There has not been a draft since.

St. Joan of Arc...PRAY FOR US!
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 05:31:16 AM
So Iggy, I’m a bit confused, what IS your military background?  First you say you have a military background and then you say you chose not to pursue a military career because patriotic woman volunteer to put their life on the line and step in harms way to defend the life and liberty of all Americans.  
What branch of the Armed Forces did you serve in?
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: JPaul on July 04, 2018, 09:19:50 AM
Not so much the military but have ceased to be shocked at what passes for chaplains in UK universities. Going into these institutions would be a horror story for any follower of the true creed and with them adopting all the legalised gender perversions I cannot see any active traditionalist priest ever wanting or being allowed a place there. Which leads us to wonder about the type that would.
  
Your Hollywood version of men and chaplains under fire makes for good PR and political kudos. I know there is a school that believes warfare is good for its own sake because it can bring out the best in humans in extreme situations ..... but I think I would be asking too many questions for my own good. I am not happy with justifications like "saving the free world" or "preserving liberty" when the opposite seems to be the case. "God is on our side" was once a battle cry ..... but this wild assumption needs updating to have an equally dramatic psychological effect.  
What in fact the U.S. military's function is, that it serves as the military enforcement arm of the regime, the foot soldiers of international capitol. It has nothing to do with defense of this country. They are a large factor in the spreading of the Luciferian agenda throughout the world.  True the soldiers who are used as fodder for the regime need spiritual resources but there can be much more sound counsel, advice, and true sacraments found apart from the military at present. The worship of the military in our society is proof that God has been supplanted by what has become a force of international mercenaries.  That the SSPX has chosen to join the conciliar church and service this organization is futher proof of their lack of principle.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 10:09:02 AM
What in fact the U.S. military's function is, that it serves as the military enforcement arm of the regime, the foot soldiers of international capitol. It has nothing to do with defense of this country. They are a large factor in the spreading of the Luciferian agenda throughout the world.  True the soldiers who are used as fodder for the regime need spiritual resources but there can be much more sound counsel, advice, and true sacraments found apart from the military at present. The worship of the military in our society is proof that God has been supplanted by what has become a force of international mercenaries.  That the SSPX has chosen to join the conciliar church and service this organization is futher proof of their lack of principle.
Nicely said by someone who has no clue...!!!  Some comments don’t deserve a reply...pearls on swine!
You love your freedom to practice your religion as you see fit and then condemn those who put their lives on the line...some even sacrificing it...providing you that freedom!
Idiot!
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: St Ignatius on July 04, 2018, 10:37:47 AM
Nicely said by someone who has no clue...!!!  Some comments don’t deserve a reply...pearls on swine!
You love your freedom to practice your religion as you see fit and then condemn those who put their lives on the line...some even sacrificing it...providing you that freedom!
Idiot!
Hah!  You providing us our "freedom?" What a joke! Who was protecting the freedom of those 2- 3 million souls in the Middle East who lost their lives?  How many of those that lost their lives, threatend my "freedom?" A big fat ZERO! 

I think it's time to review the real purpose of the "War on Terror..." should at least call it as it is, War of Terror.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 10:54:05 AM
Hah!  You providing us our "freedom?" What a joke! Who was protecting the freedom of those 2- 3 million souls in the Middle East who lost their lives?  How many of those that lost their lives, threatend my "freedom?" A big fat ZERO!

I think it's time to review the real purpose of the "War on Terror..." should at least call it as it is, War of Terror.
Ha!  There’s some good Lizard People videos on Youtube for you to believe in too.  I think there’s a few that’ll show where Elvis is living also!  Ha Ha Ha!  Oh stop, you’re making my side hurt!  Thanks for the laugh!  You’re the best!
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: JPaul on July 04, 2018, 11:50:02 AM
Nicely said by someone who has no clue...!!!  Some comments don’t deserve a reply...pearls on swine!
You love your freedom to practice your religion as you see fit and then condemn those who put their lives on the line...some even sacrificing it...providing you that freedom!
Idiot!
Of course I have a clue. The whole picture in fact. What I have said is born out by facts, hard realities.  It is you who do not see, you are one of the unfortunates who internalized the flag waving narrative that the regime has fed you. The only freedom that I have is that which the regime grants to me and when it is expedient, that will be gone as well, the military does not provide that freedom. To be clear, those who serve in the lower ranks of the military serve believing that they are keeping us safe, but they are merely pawns of the elite
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 12:09:02 PM
Of course I have a clue. The whole picture in fact. What I have said is born out by facts, hard realities.  It is you who do not see, you are one of the unfortunates who internalized the flag waving narrative that the regime has fed you. The only freedom that I have is that which the regime grants to me and when it is expedient, that will be gone as well, the military does not provide that freedom. To be clear, those who serve in the lower ranks of the military serve believing that they are keeping us safe, but they are merely pawns of the elite
Ha. Silly Man!  Enjoy your bunker as you stay hunched away waiting for the Three Days of Darkness!
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: St Ignatius on July 04, 2018, 01:03:27 PM
Ha. Silly Man!  Enjoy your bunker as you stay hunched away waiting for the Three Days of Darkness!

Yep... this was almost a reality if you would have accepted this wretch as YOUR new C & C!

(https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse2.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.wbhFTWO36stYGltdxgqvwgHaGW%26pid%3D15.1&f=1)
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: JPaul on July 04, 2018, 01:10:56 PM
Ha. Silly Man!  Enjoy your bunker as you stay hunched away waiting for the Three Days of Darkness!
:facepalm:
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Last Tradhican on July 04, 2018, 02:28:18 PM
Quote

 Hey Wessex what IS your experience with military Chaplains?  
 I’ve spent and am spending over 20 years in the military.  Not once, not once, have I met a chaplain as you described above.  Regardless of denomination, they have all been kind compassionate and even COURAGEOUS in the field of battle.  Some even risking their very lives to bring comfort and solice to those suffering both physically and spiritually.  If you feel “from your experience” that they seriously crave the company of young men what have you done to address this issue?  Who did you report this too?  What was your proof?
 Every chaplain I’ve ever met have been true American Heroes who put themselves in harms way, even gunfire and frontline action, to pray with the wounded and ask for God’s grace.


OK, above is a gentle with 20 years of real world experience in the military, telling it how he experienced it himself, from 1998 to present.


Quote

 Last week I had to take two trains, two hours each way to get to the closest Latin Mass that I could find...and this was in northern ITALY of all places.  How wonderful would it be to have the True Mass right there on base?  
 
 The Military NEEDS to have the Traditional Mass restored to it’s chapels. The chaplaincy makes exceptions for all denominations and all flavors of religion.  Let us pray that they allow this priest to enter the Chaplains Corps without compromising the Traditional Catholic faith.  Our men and woman in uniform DESPERATELY need it!


Here is another posting, sounds good also, except at the end he adds a new politically correct expression “Our men and woman in uniform DESPERATELY need it!” , instead of saying our fighting men or men in uniform, as it was always said throughout history.




Quote

 The U.S. has NEVER “called on woman to defend itself”.  NEVER.  They were never included in any mandatory draft, not even during Vietnam. Thank goodness Patriotic woman have volunteered to serve in the military since the founding of this Nation.
 Lessons learned from Vietnam was that the best military is a volunteer military.  There has not been a draft since.  St. Joan of Arc...PRAY FOR US!


Here the gentleman begins to defend the practice of having women fight in the military side by side with men and even commanding the troops. The gentleman also makes the analogy that todays fighting women in the military have the same roles as the women had since the Revolutionary War.  He also implicitly gives his opinion that we lost in Vietnam because it was a drafted Army, that had we had better quality soldiers (like today’s volunteer fighting women), we would have won the Vietnam War. He even asks Joan Of Arc to pray for us.

To me, all the credibility accuмulated by this gentleman in his initial posting, has withered away to nothing. So much so, that I came here to post my observations.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 02:34:12 PM

OK, above is a gentle with 20 years of real world experience in the military, telling it how he experienced it himself, from 1998 to present.



Here is another posting, sounds good also, except at the end he adds a new politically correct expression “Our men and woman in uniform DESPERATELY need it!” , instead of saying our fighting men or men in uniform, as it was always said throughout history.





Here the gentleman begins to defend the practice of having women fight in the military side by side with men and even commanding the troops. The gentleman also makes the analogy that todays fighting women in the military have the same roles as the women had since the Revolutionary War.  He also implicitly gives his opinion that we lost in Vietnam because it was a drafted Army, that had we had better quality soldiers (like today’s volunteer fighting women), we would have won the Vietnam War.

To me, all the credibility accuмulated by this gentleman in his initial posting, has withered away to nothing. So, much so that I came here to post my observations.
St Joan of Arc...Pray for us!
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Last Tradhican on July 04, 2018, 02:35:00 PM
The men drafted into WWII included doctors, engineers, scientists, professors, carpenters, plumbers, welders, all professionals of the highest caliber, all men who would not normally volunteer to join the military. The forced draft is precisely what made our military personal superior to todays soldiers.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: LaramieHirsch on July 04, 2018, 02:44:50 PM
Quote
"SSPX Deathwish (https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/sspx-deathwish/msg617743/#msg617743)"...



...Yeah, their withdrawl from Tulsa was really something.  You can read about it on The Hirsch Files, provided you're registered with me.  

http://thehirschfiles.blogspot.com/2017/09/wheres-tulsas-fr-stan-rother-sspx-packs.html
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Cantarella on July 04, 2018, 03:51:59 PM
Here the gentleman begins to defend the practice of having women fight in the military side by side with men and even commanding the troops. The gentleman also makes the analogy that todays fighting women in the military have the same roles as the women had since the Revolutionary War.  He also implicitly gives his opinion that we lost in Vietnam because it was a drafted Army, that had we had better quality soldiers (like today’s volunteer fighting women), we would have won the Vietnam War. He even asks Joan Of Arc to pray for us.

Women do not belong in combat.

Pope St. Pius X explicitly condemns "women in war or parliament" as a cause of "the desperation and ruin of society":

Quote
After creating man, God created woman and determined her mission, namely, that of being man’s companion, helpmeet and consolation…It is a mistake, therefore, to maintain that woman’s rights are the same as man’s. Women in war or parliament are outside their proper sphere and their position. There would be the desperation and ruin of society. Woman, created as man’s companion, must so remain under the power of love and affection, but always under his power. How mistaken, therefore, is that misguided feminism which seeks to correct God’s work. It is like a mechanic trying to correct the signs and movements of the universe. Scripture, and especially the three epistles of St. Paul, emphasizes woman’s dependence on man, her love and assistance, but not her slavery to him. Woman’s duties, however, are not confined within the household’s walls. She has a great social mission, a place in every charitable cause; work to perform on behalf of the sick the suffering and the criminal; the protection of women and children. In this great and common action women should unite and should strive to secure the means necessary to exercise the apostolic injunction of social charity.


Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: St Ignatius on July 04, 2018, 03:53:05 PM
To me, all the credibility accuмulated by this gentleman in his initial posting, has withered away to nothing. So much so, that I came here to post my observations.
I believe that your "observations" are accurate and justified...
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 03:58:46 PM
Not since the history of man has a war been fought that did not include woman.

Nowhere, not once did I say woman should be in combat roles.  Your assumptions speak for themselves.

You also greatly depart from the topic of Military Chaplains.  Feel free to start a new thread regarding woman in combat.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: St Ignatius on July 04, 2018, 04:01:57 PM
I'm not going to knock Ekim for desiring a good traditional Catholic chaplain, but, how could a Catholic priest deal with this type of phenomenon?

(https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP._pBX-6wVFv-D_sDe8HJNvAHaE8%26pid%3D15.1&f=1)

It would seem that this tolerance of perversion in the US military, is irreconcilable with Catholic Church teachings...
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Cantarella on July 04, 2018, 04:20:00 PM
I'm not going to knock Ekim for desiring a good traditional Catholic chaplain, but, how could a Catholic priest deal with this type of phenomenon?

(https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP._pBX-6wVFv-D_sDe8HJNvAHaE8%26pid%3D15.1&f=1)

It would seem that this tolerance of perversion in the US military, is irreconcilable with Catholic Church teachings...

Sadly, the attitude displayed by this woman in the picture is not far from the typical liberal woman one sees in the streets of America today.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 04:42:06 PM
I'm not going to knock Ekim for desiring a good traditional Catholic chaplain, but, how could a Catholic priest deal with this type of phenomenon?

(https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP._pBX-6wVFv-D_sDe8HJNvAHaE8%26pid%3D15.1&f=1)

It would seem that this tolerance of perversion in the US military, is irreconcilable with Catholic Church teachings...
That’s dumb...didn’t you’re momma ever teach you not to believe everything you see on the internet?
Woman are here to stay.  They are CEO’s, CFO’s, Doctor’s, lawyers, and yes, even Military Officers.  Get over it.  I guess in your Catholic Bunkers all woman curtsy as they bring you your slippers and pipe.
If you or anyone you love are ever in an emergency and a female paramedic shows up who was trained in the military please be sure to send her away.  Or, if your ever rushed to the ER and the female surgeon says “We have to operate on your loved one now”, be sure to tell them “No thank you.  I prefer to wait for a man”.

This thread has gone way off topic.  I wish you gentlemen well in your bunkers.  I hope when the shit hits the fan, what ever flavor of shit it may be, that only men come to save you and the people you love.  But of course a kind and fair maiden is close behind to blot the sweat from your brow and offer you a glass of sweet tea!  

Ahhh...Haaa...Haaa...I crack me up!
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: St Ignatius on July 04, 2018, 04:56:26 PM
That’s dumb...didn’t you’re momma ever teach you not to believe everything you see on the internet?
Nope.... but I had a papa who taught me how to discern... looks like you'll be happy with a "Bi- Ritual" priest, coming to a barrak near you.  I'm saddened by your clouded mind, surely after 20+ years in the military,  (as a Trad Catholic?) I would have assumed you would have a better sense about you...
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 05:19:05 PM
Until you walk in another mans shoes you shouldn’t pretend to know what temptations, sufferings, or sacrifices they endure.  Father Feelgood in the Bermuda shorts and T-shirt may just make it to heaven before Father Feelingbetter in the cassock and beretta.  Heck, he may, just may, make it there before you and I.  If we’re lucky to make it there at all.  

So before you throw stones at “Biritual” Priests, or any priests for that matter...unless of course they are blatant heretics...I suggest you simply pray for them.

And, oh ya...nothing good ever comes from assuming...just sayin’. LOL!

Mary Help if Christians...Pray for us.
St. Joan of Arc...Pray for us.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Cantarella on July 04, 2018, 07:35:05 PM
Study (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/study-confirms-women-dont-belong-in-combat/2015/09/13/1a1ec49e-58b6-11e5-9f54-1ea23f6e02f3_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6e5cc17a9f8c) confirms women do not belong in combat.

(As if this was not common sense)
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 04, 2018, 07:54:21 PM
Who said they did?
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: JPaul on July 04, 2018, 10:03:17 PM
Study (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/study-confirms-women-dont-belong-in-combat/2015/09/13/1a1ec49e-58b6-11e5-9f54-1ea23f6e02f3_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6e5cc17a9f8c) confirms women do not belong in combat.

(As if this was not common sense)
Catholic morality teaches the same thing just as it teaches that a Catholic soldier cannot obey an unjust or an illegal order. How many are there that follow this? Since the U.S. and other militaries have adopted the doctrine of total warfare, this has become a grave concern, as morality and ethics are no longer restraining considerations.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 05, 2018, 06:35:57 AM
Hey Last Trad,  when did I ever say ANY of this.....?

QUOTE:
“Here the gentleman begins to defend the practice of having women fight in the military side by side with men and even commanding the troops. The gentleman also makes the analogy that todays fighting women in the military have the same roles as the women had since the Revolutionary War.  He also implicitly gives his opinion that we lost in Vietnam because it was a drafted Army, that had we had better quality soldiers (like today’s volunteer fighting women), we would have won the Vietnam War.”

You should not assume.

Not once did I say woman should fight side by side with men or command troops, nor did I imply such nonsense.

I never said or implied that woman have the same roles in war today as they did during the Revolutionary War or even in ancient Carthage.  I simply said woman have been involved in war, (some quite heroically, I might add) since the beginning of time.  

I never said, or even hinted, that the war in Vietnam was lost because of a drafted militia, or that we would win that war today.  

Your assumptions and fertile imagination has drawn conclusions that do not exist.

Shame on you!
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: TxTrad on July 05, 2018, 07:09:27 AM
I thought CDF was banned?
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Incredulous on July 05, 2018, 07:28:12 AM
Who said they did?

The article states our government ignores the poor combat performance data and insist on keeping the Marines feminized.

Is it not another part of the ʝʊdɛօ-masonic conspiracy to undermine our country... or what?

Note: I'd like to see the Marines actual female performance data.

Scores:

1. Hitting the beach from vessel transport for land invasions: 10% effective.

2. Carrying 120lbs of gear over two miles of rugged terrain: 20%.

3. Automatic Rifle Shooting accuracy under enemy fire: 5%

Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Ekim on July 05, 2018, 08:03:47 AM
The article states our government ignores the poor combat performance data and insist on keeping the Marines feminized.

Is it not another part of the ʝʊdɛօ-masonic conspiracy to undermine our country... or what?

Note: I'd like to see the Marines actual female performance data.

Scores:

1. Hitting the beach from vessel transport for land invasions: 10% effective.

2. Carrying 120lbs of gear over two miles of rugged terrain: 20%.

3. Automatic Rifle Shooting accuracy under enemy fire: 5%
My apologies.  I did not realize the comment was directed at the article itself but rather the banter of the thread.
I agree, woman DO NOT...and NEVER SHOULD...be involved in direct combat roles.  
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: TxTrad on July 05, 2018, 10:32:44 AM
The article states our government ignores the poor combat performance data and insist on keeping the Marines feminized.

Is it not another part of the ʝʊdɛօ-masonic conspiracy to undermine our country... or what?

Note: I'd like to see the Marines actual female performance data.

Scores:

1. Hitting the beach from vessel transport for land invasions: 10% effective.

2. Carrying 120lbs of gear over two miles of rugged terrain: 20%.

3. Automatic Rifle Shooting accuracy under enemy fire: 5%
.
Why would you expect anything different?
Women are not meant for such and to show the "performance data" of them is to encourage lesbians to enter the military.
.
Women don't belong in the military and it has nothing to do with "performance data".  It has to do with the fact God made men and women different for a reason.  Rather than fight against it, we should embrace it.
Title: Re: SSPX Deathwish
Post by: Incredulous on July 05, 2018, 12:07:42 PM
The female Marine performance data is detailed evidence that "Equality, Liberty & Fraternity" are a ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic lie.