Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: SSPX continues downward slide  (Read 2049 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31168
  • Reputation: +27088/-494
  • Gender: Male
SSPX continues downward slide
« on: April 19, 2015, 10:55:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • For those who seldom venture into the Anonymous subforum, I'd like to draw attention to a post that is relevant to this SSPX Resistance subforum:

    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Formerly-unchanged-SSPX-chapel-changed-today
    Logged
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3473
    • Reputation: +1816/-233
    • Gender: Female
    SSPX continues downward slide
    « Reply #1 on: April 20, 2015, 01:11:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I have noticed an absence of sermons on the problems with the NO in the last 3 or 4 years.  Before that we used to get a fair number, not all the time, but enough to remind folks why they should stay away from it.

    I was at the Dickinson, TX chapel yesterday and the priest did say something along the lines that the Pope and NO are wolves in sheep's clothing, not "good" shepherds.
    Logged

    Offline veribus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 26
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX continues downward slide
    « Reply #2 on: May 04, 2015, 10:29:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Matthew and Marlelar,

    I'm not part of the SSPX Resistance, so I'm not sure what their stand is on the NO and the new Vatican II sacraments. Is it their position that the new Vatican II sacraments are invalid, or do they believe in their validity?

    I know that the mainline SSPX stand has shifted over the years, from originally resisting the new sacraments to now endorsing them, while still maintaining a preference for the Vatican II era Latin Mass (but never the pre-Vatican II Traditional Latin Mass). To me, that makes zero sense.
    Logged

    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX continues downward slide
    « Reply #3 on: May 04, 2015, 11:34:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Marlelar
    I have noticed an absence of sermons on the problems with the NO in the last 3 or 4 years.  Before that we used to get a fair number, not all the time, but enough to remind folks why they should stay away from it.

    I was at the Dickinson, TX chapel yesterday and the priest did say something along the lines that the Pope and NO are wolves in sheep's clothing, not "good" shepherds.


    I'm sure the Neo-SSPX spies will issue a report promptly.
    Logged
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline GGMoreno

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 53
    • Reputation: +59/-0
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX continues downward slide
    « Reply #4 on: May 04, 2015, 12:02:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I have a question about sung Masses which never occurred to me--do any of you know why SSPX chapels shy away from even missa cantatas?
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »