Author Topic: SSPX Communique after meeting of all Superiors (Read 25303 times)

mw2016 · « **Reply #65 on:** July 01, 2016, 11:19:21 PM »

I went to The Remnant to read Michael Matt's comments on the statement, and I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

simpletruth · « **Reply #66 on:** July 01, 2016, 11:44:30 PM »

Quote from: mw2016

Quote from: knish
is there any part of you that feels maybe -- just maybe -- the resistance was wrong about Bishop Fellay?

This may be the MOST absurd statement I've ever read here!

We are in the situation we're in PRECISELY because of Bp. Fellay's WRONG actions. His poor leadership. His bad judgment.

Bp. Fellay had a mutiny on HIS watch. He lost MANY good priests.

He has lost, and CONTINUES TO LOSE, many, many faithful.

He has taken a wrecking ball to the SSPX with his poor decisions.

Now, he makes a weak - at best! - statement that may or may not hint that the deal may or may not take place, and you think to ask if the Resistance was wrong about him??

Absurd. Utterly absurd.

Meg · « **Reply #67 on:** July 02, 2016, 06:16:20 AM »

Quote from: mw2016

I went to The Remnant to read Michael Matt's comments on the statement, and I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

I was able to post a few Resistance viewpoint posts in the comments section of that Remnant article, until the moderator told me to "give Bp. Fellay a break." Oh well. On the Vox Cantoris article on the subject, I was allowed to post a Resistance viewpoint, though. Would'da thought?

nctradcath · « **Reply #68 on:** July 02, 2016, 08:24:05 AM »

My problem with these traditional Catholic news sources" is the manifest lies that they tell in their articles. I find it incredibly irritating when they try to explain away the plain meaning of what a person said whether it be Frankie or Bishop Fellay. It is condescending and a lie that will have to be answered for in confession and penance or before Our Lord at judgement.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #69 on:** July 02, 2016, 08:36:43 PM »

We shouldn't have any difficulty understanding that Bishop Fellay has learned to accept Vatican II, because he has obviously learned how to speak in the ambivalent, vague and equivocal language of "the Council." His statement is conciliar in its style. He's actively training his followers to become acclimated to the ambiguity of "the Council" docuмents, so as to weaken their resolve to remain steadfast against its ambiguity. Once that barrier is torn down, there won't be any more "resistance" left in the SSPX.