Author Topic: SSPX Communique after meeting of all Superiors (Read 25289 times)

MaterDominici · « **Reply #85 on:** July 07, 2016, 04:32:21 PM »

If the district superiors were against Bp Fellay, the priests would be able to freely speak their minds without being threatened and reassigned. As it is now, warning the faithful of the dangers of a deal with Rome is not something the priests are allowed to do... see Fr. Roy's letter for proof.

I think there might have been specific details that inclined them away from Rome's offer, but I don't believe the superiors are altogether against the idea.

Raphaela · « **Reply #86 on:** July 07, 2016, 06:16:24 PM »

Quote from: Graham

Quote from: snowball
Fr. Girouard's email mentions a Rothschild donation, but was it not
the Gutmanns who donated ? Here is a link to the story:
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-rothschild-gutmann-money-behind.html

He is probably inferring that the Gutmann donation was ultimately a Rothschild directive.

What nonsense. Mrs Gutmann was from a convert family and a supporter of Archbishop Lefebvre from the early days of the Society. Nothing to do with the Rothschilds.

BluePanel · « **Reply #87 on:** July 09, 2016, 06:26:17 PM »

Did +Williamson comment on this?

Mark 79 · « **Reply #88 on:** July 09, 2016, 07:30:30 PM »

Quote from: Raphaela

Quote from: Graham
Quote from: snowball
Fr. Girouard's email mentions a Rothschild donation, but was it not
the Gutmanns who donated ? Here is a link to the story:
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-rothschild-gutmann-money-behind.html

He is probably inferring that the Gutmann donation was ultimately a Rothschild directive.

What nonsense. Mrs Gutmann was from a convert family and a supporter of Archbishop Lefebvre from the early days of the Society. Nothing to do with the Rothschilds.

The Rothschild-Gutmann Money Behind the SSPX Kosher Imperative
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-rothschild-gutmann-money-behind.html

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #89 on:** July 09, 2016, 09:18:24 PM »

Quote from: mw2016

Quote from: Neil Obstat
Quote

But Fellay, like the hated Herod Antipas, to whom Our Lord referred as "that vixen," using a play on words that alluded to Herod's ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, is not one to give up easily his ambitions to become a Newchurch prelate, which he has harbored since at least the year 2000

"At least the year 2000" is an understatement. I heard him in person in 1995 say that the advent of regularization is like a "luscious plum" to him, and only later did I realize he may have been unintentionally describing the forbidden fruit of the Garden of Eden.

Meaning he wants to eat it, but he knows that eating it will result in death??

I saw him standing there and cupping his hands with his fingers pointing upwards as he slowly and deliberately said "luscious plum." What kind of imagery is that supposed to evoke in the listener if not what I'm referring to? When Eve took the forbidden fruit was she primarily thinking about the DEATH aspect, or was she swooning over the temptation being proffered, something otherwise unobtainable -- for her it was knowledge and "to be like God," but for +Fellay, the attraction is Ordinary Jurisdiction.