Quote from: nctradcath

My problem with these traditional Catholic news sources" is the manifest lies that they tell in their articles. I find it incredibly irritating when they try to explain away the plain meaning of what a person said whether it be Frankie or Bishop Fellay. It is condescending and a lie that will have to be answered for in confession and penance or before Our Lord at judgement.

Condescending...  Like, maybe calling the Holy Father "Frankie"?

"Stooge"?  Charity is hard at work in this thread.

The neo-SSPX is like a hypothetical Android tablet produced by Apple.

Bernie Fellay, the Neo-SSPX's Clueless Superior Dictator Was Slapped down by His Remaining Regional and National Superiors Meeting at Econe, Switzerland, June 25-28, 2016

Fellay Was Forced to Pull back from His Expansionistic Desires And to State the Unthinkable (for Him) The Fact that All Traditional Catholics Clearly See That Francis-Bergoglio Is Teaching Errors And that Nothing Can Happen while the Marxist Bergoglio Remains Newpope

It happened once before when the Neo-SSPX's Superior-Dictator Bernie Fellay got too full of himself and his desire to join the anti-Catholic Newchurch of the New Order. When Fellay went too far to Newchurch under Benedict-Ratzinger's regime, the Neo-SSPX superiors met in northern Italy and gave Fellay a vote of no confidence, telling him in no uncertain terms that he had no authority from them to sell out the Neo-SSPX to Newchurch. They also demanded to see all the docuмents that he was secretly exchanging with Ratzinger, which Fellay had previously withheld from his own superiors and from the NSSPXers at large.

Now the remaining Neo-SSPX superiors (one-sixth of them have already abandoned him) meeting in Econe, Switzerland, June 25-28, 2016, have repeated their vote of no-confidence in Fellay. As a result, Fellay issued a brief communique that tried desperately to put favorable light on the matter. But make no mistake: the remaining Neo-SSPX Regional and National Superiors have once again slapped Fellay down.

It may be that one of the factors that contributed to this courageous action on the part of the Neo-SSPX Regional and National superiors was the addition of two new exemplary traditional Catholic bishops recently consecrated by the original SSPX's senior bishop, Richard Williamson. The loose association of traditional Catholic clergy known as the Traditional Resistance now has three traditional Catholic bishops: Williamson, Jean-Michel Faure and Dom Tomas Aquinas, O.S.B.

Fellay now has, in addition to himself, only two bishops remaining, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais and Alfonso de Galarreta.

Fellay's communique indicates that Fellay has been forced to pull back from his expansionistic desires and reaffirms that the central purpose of the Neo-SSPX is to ordain priests. Fellay was actually forced to do the unthinkable (for him): to state the obvious fact that all traditional Catholics already see, that Newpope Francis-Bergoglio is teaching errors. Fellay was even forced to abjure "canonical recognition" by the anti-Catholic Newchurch of the New Order. Fellay was also forced to abjure Francis-Bergoglio, when he stated that nothing can happen while the Marxist Bergoglio remains Newpope, because he is against Sacred Tradition. Thus, the Neo-SSPX must wait for better days, which at this rate may be very long in coming.

True Catholics, this slap-down of Fellay is quite remarkable. He is currently trying to pick up the pieces of his New Order ambitions, which have been smashed to smithereens by his own superiors. But Fellay, like the hated Herod Antipas, to whom Our Lord referred as "that vixen," using a play on words that alluded to Herod's ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, is not one to give up easily his ambitions to become a Newchurch prelate, which he has harbored since at least the year 2000. There will be much more to this story. And the TRADITIO Network, as it has done now for over twenty years, will bring you the independent coverage for which it has been noted around the world since its inception in 1994 as the "First Traditional Roman Catholic Internet Site" and as the "Independent Voice of Traditional Roman Catholicism."

Quote

But Fellay, like the hated Herod Antipas, to whom Our Lord referred as "that vixen," using a play on words that alluded to Herod's ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, is not one to give up easily his ambitions to become a Newchurch prelate, which he has harbored since at least the year 2000.

"At least the year 2000" is an understatement.  I heard him in person in 1995 say that the advent of regularization is like a "luscious plum" to him, and only later did I realize he may have been unintentionally describing the forbidden fruit of the Garden of Eden.

.

Quote from: Neil Obstat

Quote

But Fellay, like the hated Herod Antipas, to whom Our Lord referred as "that vixen," using a play on words that alluded to Herod's ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, is not one to give up easily his ambitions to become a Newchurch prelate, which he has harbored since at least the year 2000

"At least the year 2000" is an understatement.  I heard him in person in 1995 say that the advent of regularization is like a "luscious plum" to him, and only later did I realize he may have been unintentionally describing the forbidden fruit of the Garden of Eden.

Meaning he wants to eat it, but he knows that eating it will result in death??