How much of this would you say is on the SSPX priests?
If my eyes were open enough to see the changes, it is only because the SSPX priests I grew up with taught us about their cause, what they stood for and why. They had a missionary spirit the teach the faithful not just the pretty parts of the Faith but also about her enemies, their operations, about the Crisis, its consequences, and how all of that affects our daily lives and the decisions we make. We heard it from the pulpit, in conferences and around the dinner table. We heard about groups that made agreements and how that went. We heard about developments and/or antics in Rome. We knew our confessions and marriages were valid and why. We were taught utmost confidence in supplied jurisdiction as being part of the wisdom of the Church. The Crisis wasn't all they talked about but it was frequent enough that you'd have to be willfully disconnected not to hear it and take it to heart at some point.
They must not be doing this anymore. Or if they are, it must be a diluted, pro-agreement, Frankenstein version. We all must take a personal interest in these matters of Faith, but we don't know what we don't know and many do not do well self-taught. There has to be a lack of leadership contributing to the problem too. I was dismayed that no one seemed to bat an eye with the marriage deal (other than France, merci la France!). But maybe many priests haven't even mentioned it (who but the most liberal would boast such a thing?!) or maybe they just aren't teaching the Crisis as profoundly as they used, so no one even realizes what that deal means beyond the superficial claims. Understandably from their perspective, priests who want to remain in good standing will not promote the Resistance, but they must not even be teaching the Crisis like they used to, or they would unwittingly be promoting the Resistance.