I'm trying to sort this out. :confused1: ggreg, I agree. The modernists write badly, but intentionally. They write that way in hopes that the man in the pew will think that they are brilliant; therefore, won't bother to decipher what they are actually saying. :read-paper: It's oftentimes heresy, of course. Unfortunately, what they don't realize is that the average Catholic has been so dumbed down that they don't recognize heresy when they read it, and probably wouldn't care if they do.
Also, thank goodness for the "eleison comments," because that is clearly stated and pure truth. The expulsions, whether they be Fathers Hewko, Pfeiffer, Cardozo, or even +Tissier are because they do speak clearly with the truth,
which threatens the neo-sspx/opus fellay "truth." The original SSPX spoke the truth fearlessly, but now it's not just new Rome that they have to watch out for, but their own leaders. :heretic: All this silly bickering :argue: about what this thread is about--the effectiveness of the SSPX-- is irrelevant because the old SSPX is basically kaput. They need to rebuild. Which brings one back to ggreg's wonderful example about seeds. Pray God that they will have the courage and strength to do it.