Author Topic: SSPX Camp Counselor Arrested for Raping Boys in Post Falls ID (Read 52642 times)

Matthew · « **Reply #10 on:** October 27, 2015, 08:09:43 PM »

I pointed out some things in the story now.

It really does look like a hit piece on the SSPX. And no, not the neo-SSPX that we all oppose for changing their orientation towards Modernist Rome, Vatican II, etc. -- the SSPX that many of us supported for years.

If the SSPX were being attacked for modernism, compromising, etc. I'd join in. But that's not what they're being attacked for here.

This is a subtle hit piece, calculated to give you an erroneous impression about the SSPX and the priests mentioned in particular.

Maybe they got on someone's "crap list" for not going along with the program, and now their reputations are being sullied using a common tactic of the Freemasons? Nothing would surprise me.

I'm only guessing about that, but what I *do* know for sure is that we have to be careful what we give credence to, and we have to always USE OUR BRAINS. The truth never hurt anyone.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #11 on:** October 27, 2015, 08:55:48 PM »

I think you're being a little too nice -- not sarcasm, I do mean just a little.

If STAS gets rid of someone for the reason mentioned, they should probably alert the priests of the district as the chance of him attending an SSPX Mass would be fairly high.

Also, if the priests were given any bit of information that suggested illegal behavior, they should have passed that on to the authorities. Even if you can manage to keep the possible offender away from the children of your congregation, he's going to look elsewhere. If you have enough suspicion to tell him he can't assist with the camp, you probably have enough that you should be filing a report.

Cantarella · « **Reply #12 on:** October 27, 2015, 09:05:34 PM »

Quote

The detective learned that Sloniker had attended St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary, also part of the Society of St. Pius X, in Winona, Minnesota. Vassal said in an Oct. 2 interview with police that the seminary in 2005 deemed Sloniker to be mentally unstable after he tried to circuмcise himself. He was removed from the seminary program.

How it is that a man is expelled from the SSPX Seminary over mental instability and then he becomes a SSPX Youth Camp Counselor? Don't they run background checks of some sort to try to prevent this?

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #13 on:** October 27, 2015, 09:17:02 PM »

Quote from: Cantarella

How it is that a man is expelled from the SSPX Seminary over mental instability and then he becomes a SSPX Youth Camp Counselor? Don't they run background checks of some sort to try to prevent this?

It's almost as crazy as putting an apostate in charge of a seminary.

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #14 on:** October 27, 2015, 09:30:56 PM »

Quote from: Cantarella

Quote
The detective learned that Sloniker had attended St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary, also part of the Society of St. Pius X, in Winona, Minnesota. Vassal said in an Oct. 2 interview with police that the seminary in 2005 deemed Sloniker to be mentally unstable after he tried to circuмcise himself. He was removed from the seminary program.

How it is that a man is expelled from the SSPX Seminary over mental instability and then he becomes a SSPX Youth Camp Counselor? Don't they run background checks of some sort to try to prevent this?

I don't think that kind of thing would show up on a person's record. Background checks generally look for criminal records, and I doubt this guy was arrested for attempting self-mutilation. If he didn't have any arrests due to mental illness episodes, then his background check would come up clean. If someone is just seeing a psychiatrist or taking medication, that wouldn't show up.

However, word of mouth spreads pretty quickly in traddy circles. No doubt there were whispers, which may have been dismissed by those in charge as idle gossip.