Much of his abuse was committed "on the road" with children. Apparently that is the abuse that was reported to the priests, so.... again... after the reports of abuse he did away from "the church and summer camp" and after reports of his self-cricuмcision, why was he allowed around children at the church and summer camp?
The reasonable interpretation consistent with BOTH the SSPX statement and the statements of "several" who reported the abuse is: "We ignored the reports because the reported abuse didn't happen at the church or summer camp. We also thought it was just fine to put parish children with a nut who attempted to circuмcise himself at the seminary."