We have been speaking about the "ALL POINTS BULLETIN" and to that point, has the SSPX made any comment on this issue we have spent so much time discussing?
Yes, and a disappointing comment it is:
http://icc.id.sspx.org/en/faithfulTo me, this is the most troubling statement: "To date, the Society of St. Pius X has not been advised of any report of criminal activity at the church or on the summer camps."
Why the qualifier "...at the church or on the summer camps."? The statement reeks of mental reservation.
According to news reports, "several" people state that they reported Sloniker to the priests, yet the priests continued to allow Sloniker access to children. Whether or not Sloniker's crimes were "at the church or on the summer camps" or elsewhere, the priests had a duty to protect the children.
I would normally be suspicious of the news reports, but the tightly crafted statement reeking of mental reservation turns my suspicions back upon the priests for serious malfeasance.
Even the recognition that Sloniker tried to "circuмcise" (castrate?) himself at the seminary should have alerted the priests to keep Sloniker away from children. I wonder about the "circuмcise" description. It is far more common for pedophiles to attempt to castrate themselves thinking that eliminating their male hormones will eliminate their evil temptations, than to simply circuмcise themselves. Either way, why didn't the priests protect the children?
Has the SSPX learned nothing from the heinous Novus Ordo crimes and enablers? Why are those priests still around children?