Author Topic: SSPX Bishops letters are genuin!! -SSPX General House Communiqu (Read 2732 times)

Lucca Back · « **on:** May 12, 2012, 04:55:52 AM »

5-11-2012

An exchange of private letters between the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X and the three other bishops was circulated on the Internet on May 9, 2012. This behavior is reprehensible. The person who breached the confidentiality of this internal correspondence committed a serious sin.

....

Menzingen, May 11, 2012

http://sspx.org/theological_commission/general_house_communique_5-11-2012.htm

Lucca Back · « **Reply #1 on:** May 12, 2012, 05:01:08 AM »

Quote from: Lucca Back

5-11-2012

An exchange of private letters between the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X and the three other bishops was circulated on the Internet on May 9, 2012. This behavior is reprehensible. The person who breached the confidentiality of this internal correspondence committed a serious sin.

....

Menzingen, May 11, 2012

http://sspx.org/theological_commission/general_house_communique_5-11-2012.htm

We're forming our laity urgently!- These letters were very decisive for us.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #2 on:** May 12, 2012, 07:16:17 AM »

Quote from: Lucca Back

5-11-2012

An exchange of private letters between the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X and the three other bishops was circulated on the Internet on May 9, 2012. This behavior is reprehensible. The person who breached the confidentiality of this internal correspondence committed a serious sin.

....

Menzingen, May 11, 2012

http://sspx.org/theological_commission/general_house_communique_5-11-2012.htm

I presume the behavior you find reprehensible is bishop Fellay's?

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #3 on:** May 12, 2012, 07:21:01 AM »

Quote from: Seraphim

Quote from: Lucca Back
5-11-2012

An exchange of private letters between the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X and the three other bishops was circulated on the Internet on May 9, 2012. This behavior is reprehensible. The person who breached the confidentiality of this internal correspondence committed a serious sin.

....

Menzingen, May 11, 2012

http://sspx.org/theological_commission/general_house_communique_5-11-2012.htm

I presume the behavior you find reprehensible is bishop Fellay's?

Never mind.

I did not notice it is bishop fellay saying the leaker's behavior is reprehensible.

Hopefully it will allow the laity to rally around the fight for doctrine.

And snuff the sellout with Rome.

I sense this possibility is really what has Bishop Fellay's dander up.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #4 on:** May 12, 2012, 08:49:24 AM »

Quote from: Seraphim

I sense this possibility is really what has Bishop Fellay's dander up.

The problem isn't even anymore the question of an official or unofficial deal.

The problem is Bishop Fellay's tyrannical grip on the SSPX, and his determined effort to shift the SSPX into the conciliar orbit.

The solution to the problem is to break that grip, to unequivocally and unashamedly repeat the old rhetoric of Archbishop Lefebvre. To free the priests to preach authentic Tradition.

Once his power is broken, once the priests are unafraid, gradually a parallel leadership can be given the real authority. Then the effort to take back control over the money and finances can begin, and finally the effort to root out masonic infiltrators can commence in earnest.

JPaul · « **Reply #5 on:** May 12, 2012, 08:56:39 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: Seraphim
I sense this possibility is really what has Bishop Fellay's dander up.

The problem isn't even anymore the question of an official or unofficial deal.

The problem is Bishop Fellay's tyrannical grip on the SSPX, and his determined effort to shift the SSPX into the conciliar orbit.

The solution to the problem is to break that grip, to unequivocally and unashamedly repeat the old rhetoric of Archbishop Lefebvre. To free the priests to preach authentic Tradition.

Once his power is broken, once the priests are unafraid, gradually a parallel leadership can be given the real authority. Then the effort to take back control over the money and finances can begin, and finally the effort to root out masonic infiltrators can commence in earnest.

I think that we will find that all the exits have been barred and there is no escape. No one will have access to the resources to mount a defense or rollback.
And yet, all of those resources will be at hand for Bishop Fellay, Mr. Krah, and thier cohort to devastate their adversaries. Thier will also include a very sympathetic Jєωιѕн media who will try to bury the Catholics.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #6 on:** May 12, 2012, 08:59:17 AM »

Quote from: J.Paul

I think that we will find that all the exits have been barred and there is no escape. No one will have access to the resources to mount a defense or rollback.

It's just a matter of enough priests realizing that false obedience to the cult-like grip of Bishop Fellay is not the purpose of their priestly vocation.

JPaul · « **Reply #7 on:** May 12, 2012, 11:22:46 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: J.Paul
I think that we will find that all the exits have been barred and there is no escape. No one will have access to the resources to mount a defense or rollback.

It's just a matter of enough priests realizing that false obedience to the cult-like grip of Bishop Fellay is not the purpose of their priestly vocation.

I agree Tele. I was only saying that I'm sure that +Fellay/Krah have all finances and assets under their sole legal control. It will cost a great deal of money to regain those in court.

eddiearent · « **Reply #8 on:** May 12, 2012, 01:43:16 PM »

If things were done more in the open than there probably would have been no leaks needed. I remember Bishop Tissier coming here for Confirmations shortly after the "doctinal preamble" was made known public and the bishop basically called it unacceptable because it ignored the discussions between Rome and the SSPX. Flash forward about 7 months later and it's totally the opposite. It's very strange. Rome continues its crash coarse into error. They are the ones that need a true profession of faith. Not the priests and bishops of the SSPX.