Author Topic: SSPX Bishops letters are genuin!! -SSPX General House Communiqu (Read 8754 times)

Lucca Back · « **on:** May 12, 2012, 04:55:52 AM »

5-11-2012

An exchange of private letters between the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X and the three other bishops was circulated on the Internet on May 9, 2012. This behavior is reprehensible. The person who breached the confidentiality of this internal correspondence committed a serious sin.

....

Menzingen, May 11, 2012

http://sspx.org/theological_commission/general_house_communique_5-11-2012.htm

Lucca Back · « **Reply #1 on:** May 12, 2012, 05:01:08 AM »

Quote from: Lucca Back

5-11-2012

An exchange of private letters between the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X and the three other bishops was circulated on the Internet on May 9, 2012. This behavior is reprehensible. The person who breached the confidentiality of this internal correspondence committed a serious sin.

....

Menzingen, May 11, 2012

http://sspx.org/theological_commission/general_house_communique_5-11-2012.htm

We're forming our laity urgently!- These letters were very decisive for us.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #2 on:** May 12, 2012, 07:16:17 AM »

Quote from: Lucca Back

5-11-2012

An exchange of private letters between the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X and the three other bishops was circulated on the Internet on May 9, 2012. This behavior is reprehensible. The person who breached the confidentiality of this internal correspondence committed a serious sin.

....

Menzingen, May 11, 2012

http://sspx.org/theological_commission/general_house_communique_5-11-2012.htm

I presume the behavior you find reprehensible is bishop Fellay's?

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #3 on:** May 12, 2012, 07:21:01 AM »

Quote from: Seraphim

Quote from: Lucca Back
5-11-2012

An exchange of private letters between the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X and the three other bishops was circulated on the Internet on May 9, 2012. This behavior is reprehensible. The person who breached the confidentiality of this internal correspondence committed a serious sin.

....

Menzingen, May 11, 2012

http://sspx.org/theological_commission/general_house_communique_5-11-2012.htm

I presume the behavior you find reprehensible is bishop Fellay's?

Never mind.

I did not notice it is bishop fellay saying the leaker's behavior is reprehensible.

Hopefully it will allow the laity to rally around the fight for doctrine.

And snuff the sellout with Rome.

I sense this possibility is really what has Bishop Fellay's dander up.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #4 on:** May 12, 2012, 08:49:24 AM »

Quote from: Seraphim

I sense this possibility is really what has Bishop Fellay's dander up.

The problem isn't even anymore the question of an official or unofficial deal.

The problem is Bishop Fellay's tyrannical grip on the SSPX, and his determined effort to shift the SSPX into the conciliar orbit.

The solution to the problem is to break that grip, to unequivocally and unashamedly repeat the old rhetoric of Archbishop Lefebvre. To free the priests to preach authentic Tradition.

Once his power is broken, once the priests are unafraid, gradually a parallel leadership can be given the real authority. Then the effort to take back control over the money and finances can begin, and finally the effort to root out masonic infiltrators can commence in earnest.