Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17]

Author Topic: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers  (Read 6899 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Venantius0518

Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #80 on: May 21, 2020, 11:05:39 PM »
Quote from: Sam Smith on May 21, 2020, 09:52:38 PM
Fr. Marshall Roberts' Facebook page shows he is in Portales, NM.
He is, and he is under the direction of Fr. Pfeiffer in KY, serving Fr. Pfeiffer's followers in Portales. 
Logged

Offline Eliza10

Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #81 on: June 02, 2020, 12:27:30 PM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on May 17, 2020, 02:41:38 PM
So far there's enough evidence that the following need to be called out, and the most egregious would be one

Bishop Bernard Fellay.

Bishops Fellay, we demand a public explanation for why you re-assigned the pederasts into positions where they could harm children.
Ladislaus, I don't think there is any plausible explanation. I am sure he can employ experts to make him look as good as possible. What sort of explanation would satisfy you? There isn't any worthwhile explanation. What he did tells us who he really is. He can never be trusted. 
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #82 on: June 02, 2020, 12:42:50 PM »
Quote from: Eliza10 on June 02, 2020, 12:27:30 PM
Ladislaus, I don't think there is any plausible explanation. I am sure he can employ experts to make him look as good as possible. What sort of explanation would satisfy you? There isn't any worthwhile explanation. What he did tells us who he really is. He can never be trusted.

Right, at this moment I am incapable of imagining a satisfactory explanation for what he did.  At least, though, if he could make a convincing case that he did not know, one could write it off as merely gross incompetence.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #83 on: June 02, 2020, 12:44:49 PM »
Quote from: Venantius0518 on May 20, 2020, 08:46:52 PM
Fr. Roberts was sent packing from Christ the King seminary for propositioning a seminarian.  He applied to the sspx.  Christ the King informed the SSPX of the issue.  The SSPX accepted Roberts as a seminarian and later ordained him.  All this while b. Williamson was in charge.

A LOT of people made b. Williamson aware of Fr. Abraham.

In past history religious hierarchy did not wait for civil authorities.  They are took immediate action and such priests were sent to monasteries, never to be heard from again.

I have heard that ICK informed the SSPX but never saw any evidence for it.  Is this established fact?  Then-seminarian Roberts' explanation for having been tossed from ICK was that he was considered too Traditional, but I often chided him for his Modernist tendencies.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17]
« previous next »