Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers  (Read 6896 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #75 on: May 20, 2020, 06:17:25 PM »
I'm surprised given that it is mention in almost every article about Fr. Urrutigioty and comes right from then Fr. Morello's letter.
Fr. Morello does not elaborate in the letter. I do not know about the Calderon's because I did not need to know more, once I classify someone as urine (meado)  I don't bother studying the matter further. I was just curious because you mentioned the Calderons. There are so many stories of saints and good Catholics in the history of the Church that I will never get to all of them in my lifetime, so I do not waste time on trash stories like Urritigoity.

Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #76 on: May 20, 2020, 08:41:39 PM »
It is 25 years of meeting the different traveling SSPX priests, figure just 10 new priests a year that I met and you have 250 priest. I was the one that would pickup the three bishops at the airport (never met Bp. Galaraga),  and Superior Generals, and priests. I was not the normal parishioner that just goes to mass on Sundays and leaves after mass, not knowing anyone. I had dinner with them and talked to them like one would a friend. And I am not the type that idolizes people because they have a position or money, for I have had both too. When I talk to people I do not refrain from talking about any decent subject, for I am not afraid of anyone but God.

Now, you need to seriously apologize for your slanderous detraction where you said they were fαɢɢօts.


You confuse your own way to handle and talk about these things with mine. I didn't call any specific SSPX priest effeminate or a fαɢɢօt. You said that you know them personally and have spotted so many or so few of them. I rejected to even mention any information about any possible such personal witness of mine. I just gave an estimate, a guess about numbers, based on survey results, other publicly known facts, and common sense, not on my personal experience with individual priests. Others in this thread did the same. It's not slanderous detraction to give a guess about such numbers. You seem to be somehow emotionally disturbed about the news.



Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #77 on: May 20, 2020, 08:46:52 PM »
Fr. Roberts was independent and had been for a while. In fact, how many here are aware that Fr. Roberts was posting on ex-Trad forums such Angelqueen and Ignis Ardens for many years? If I recall correctly he was even confronted online by the moderators on AQ and they accepted his explanation and gave him the benefit of the doubt. He has fooled a lot of people because he was allowed to rehabilitate himself and built up something of what you might call, social proof.

The SSPX would also be at fault for negligence as they never made Bishop Williamson aware of the situation. Anyway, Fr. Abraham was pulled from the Resistance circuit in Ireland once the information about him was known. Keep in mind, the state looked into his case and could not bring charges against him. That's a problem the summum ius types are going to run into, what if the civil authorities don't find anything or get it wrong?
Fr. Roberts was sent packing from Christ the King seminary for propositioning a seminarian.  He applied to the sspx.  Christ the King informed the SSPX of the issue.  The SSPX accepted Roberts as a seminarian and later ordained him.  All this while b. Williamson was in charge.

A LOT of people made b. Williamson aware of Fr. Abraham.

In past history religious hierarchy did not wait for civil authorities.  They are took immediate action and such priests were sent to monasteries, never to be heard from again.

Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #78 on: May 21, 2020, 09:00:59 PM »

Re: SSPX And Infiltration Of Sex Abusers
« Reply #79 on: May 21, 2020, 09:52:38 PM »
Fr. Roberts was independent and had been for a while. In fact, how many here are aware that Fr. Roberts was posting on ex-Trad forums such Angelqueen and Ignis Ardens for many years? If I recall correctly he was even confronted online by the moderators on AQ and they accepted his explanation and gave him the benefit of the doubt. He has fooled a lot of people because he was allowed to rehabilitate himself and built up something of what you might call, social proof.

Fr. Marshall Roberts' Facebook page shows he is in Portales, NM.