I don’t find Fr. Paul Robinson dangerous.  If he were right, I’d agree with him.  He’s just wrong.  

Best not to say that name out loud.

NOT Celier BUT EMMANUEL DU CHALARD!

Communiqué from the General House of the Society of Saint Pius X concerning the Nov. 22, 2018 meeting between Cardinal Ladaria and Fr. Pagliarani.

On Thursday, November 22, 2018, Fr. David Pagliarani, Superior General of the Society of Saint Pius X, traveled to Rome at the invitation of Cardinal Luis Ladaria Ferrer, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. He was accompanied by Fr. Emmanuel du Chalard. Cardinal Ladaria was assisted by Archbishop Guido Pozzo, Secretary of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei.

The meeting took place in the offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Its purpose was to allow Cardinal Ladaria and Fr. Pagliarani to meet for the first time and together to take stock of the relations between the Holy See and the Society of Saint Pius X since the election of its new Superior General last July.

During the meeting with the Roman authorities, it was recalled that the fundamental problem is actually doctrinal, and neither the Society nor Rome can escape this fact. Because of this irreducible doctrinal divergence, for the past seven years no attempt to compose a draft of a doctrinal statement acceptable to both parties has succeeded. This is why the doctrinal question remains absolutely essential.

The Holy See says the same when it solemnly declares that no canonical status can be established for the Society until after the signing of a doctrinal docuмent.

Therefore, everything impels the Society to resume theological discussions with the awareness that the Good Lord does not necessarily ask the Society to convince its interlocutors, but rather to bear unconditional witness to the faith in the sight of the Church.

The future of the Society is in the hands of Providence and the Most Blessed Virgin Mary, as is demonstrated by its whole history, from the Society's foundation to this day.

The members of the Society want nothing else but to serve the Church and to cooperate effectively in her regeneration, to the point of giving their lives for her triumph if necessary. But they can choose neither the manner, nor the terms, nor the moment of what belongs to God alone.

Menzingen, November 23, 2018

I don’t find Fr. Paul Robinson dangerous.  If he were right, I’d agree with him.  He’s just wrong. 

Since he’s a priest, his being wrong makes him dangerous, as he’s in a position to influence others.  Being a “Traditional” priest makes him even more dangerous.  “Look, even a Traditional priest believes …”. I have a long history in Jesuit schools, and I have seen nothing destroy the faith of young people more quickly and more thoroughly than the doubts they instilled about the historicity and veracity of Sacred Scripture.  Modernism has its roots there.  Once any part of Scripture is called into doubt, all of it is up for grabs.

I would consider Fr. Robinson 'dangerous' given his position teaching at the school.  He is capable of influencing the minds of these young people.  We homeschool, but my oldest told me, per friends at the school, that Fr Robinson holds debates on the subject.  I don't know how much sway he has over some of the older students, but the younger ones are certainly more impressionable.  If the parents are not knowledgeable they will not be able to speak on the subject themselves.

Protestants make movies about such teachers, who push evolution on the kids, mock creation before their faces, blaspheme God on the regular, etc.

I could envision a Father Paul Robinson deriding some child in school for being a "Biblicist".  In fact, his term is derisive of many Traditional Catholics who happen to hold that the Sacred Scriptures are authored by the Holy Spirit and are the inerrant Word of God, and that, as the Pontifical Biblical Commission he loves to (falsely) appeal to ruled, to be considered historical unless it's otherwise obvious and interpreted in a non-historical way by unanimous Patristic teaching.  So, count me as a proud "Biblicist".  No Church Father believed Genesis to be an allegory, except arguably Origen (who was condemned for a fair number of heresies).

And let us not forget how he threw Traditional Catholics who were opposed to the jab under the bus by refusing to sign their objection papers.

Between what this man must say in sermons and what he must teach in schools, he's incredibly dangerous and walking among Traditional circles like a wrecking ball.

What do you mean, Sean?

Even Traditio will not touch him. His black acolyte is another character approaching similar status

Seraphina, If you do a search for Robinson you will find 17 pages with 30 entries per page, many of them dedicated to the modernism and heresy taught by Fr Robinson (with the blessing of the SSPX hierarchy). I don't how you can have missed it. He targets all ages and I even heard he has charge of the NO priests studying to transition to Tradition.

The other American Fr Themman, along with Robinson brought an end to the SSPX Australia seminary thus throwing prospective Asian and African vocations onto uncertain paths. Themman, rewarded with the superiorship of Australia is seen in his Rip Van Winkle soutane even when awake.