Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Nevertheless, by prudence and given that a suspicion of crime remains, the judge felt it necessary to restrict the future ministry of Fr. Frédéric Abbet with the following measures, issued by decree on June 6, 2006 and communicated to the interested party on July 27, 2006.
Bishop Fellay,It is now 10 days since I've written you and still have yet to receive a response. Is this the sort of "transparency" the public can expect from the SSPX?Fr. Benoît Wailliez, former prior of Brussels chapel[color][size][font]I've learned from speaking with the victims' families that Fr. Abbet roams free in Switzerland and appears never to have served his time in prison.I understand the SSPX has since expelled Fr. Abbet from the Society.Will the Society help the [victim's] family locate the current whereabouts of Fr. Abbet? As you are in Switzerland and have many connections, surely you can easily track him down and perform this act of aid to the victims.Critics say you are above all most culpable in the abuse of these young victims, because it is you who violated the ban by placing Fr. Abbet in a priory with direct access to boys, knowing very well it would be impossible to supervise his every move.Are you willing to admit responsibility, issue a public apology to the victims and resign for what some say is your criminal negligence?[/font][/size][/color]
Does it trouble your conscience that boys were harmed by Fr. Philippe Peignot, whose ban you also lifted and whom you allowed to be around boys and lead scout camps?
Why did you transfer Fr. Pierre Duverger to the United States after his sex scandal in France involving another woman?Why did you fail to notify the police as soon as you learned of the rapes committed by Fr. Christophe Roisnel? Failure to report is a violation of French law, as you well know.Will the SSPX publish a list of all credibly accused clergy, current or past, in an act of transparency?We know of many other priests involved in sex scandals whom you transferred to another assignment. Do you think it's correct to be transferring and reassigning accused sɛҳuąƖ predators to new locations, where they often go on to abuse again? Is this the accepted modus operandi of the SSPX?
They don’t need to respond to Opus judei’s Agent, “Church Militant”
They don’t need to respond to Opus judei’s Agent, “Church Militant”Besides, the SSPX cannot prepare it’s defense until the “repressed memory” stooges are brought forth to testify against them.It will take some time for Jєωιѕн lawyers and psychiatrist to prepare their testimonies